nach oben

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Erschienen in:

01.02.2010

Effects of cognitive styles on 2D drafting and design performance in digital media

verfasst von: Sule Tasli Pektas

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This paper investigates the interactions between design students’ cognitive styles, as measured by Riding’s Cognitive Styles Analysis, and performance in 2D drafting and design tasks in digital media. An empirical research revealed that Imager students outperformed Verbalisers in both drafting and creativity scores. Wholist–Analytic cognitive style dimension was found to be independent from drafting and design performance. The study suggests that examining the cognitive styles of students in Computer Aided Design (CAD) education deserves further attention and may facilitate for improvements in learning processes.

Vorheriger Artikel Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design

Nächster Artikel Difference in time influencing creativity performance between design and management majors

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview: Boulder.

Archer, L. B. (1984). Whatever became of design methodology. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 347–349). Chichester: Wiley.

Armstrong, S. (2000). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20, 323–339.CrossRef

Atkinson, S. (1998). Cognitive style in the context of design and technology project work. Educational Psychology, 18, 83–194.CrossRef

Atkinson, S. (2006). Factors influencing successful achievement in contrasting design and technology activities in higher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 193–213.CrossRef

Bergum, B. O. (1977). Undergraduate self perceptions of creativity and independence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 187–190.

Bilda, Z., & Demirkan, H. (2003). An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies, 24, 27–50.CrossRef

Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41–54.CrossRef

Coyne, R. (2002). Design devices: digital drawing and the pursuit of difference. Design Studies, 23, 263–286.CrossRef

Cross, N. (1985). Styles of learning, designing and computing. Design Studies, 6, 157–162.CrossRef

Cross, N. (1990). The nature and nurture of design ability. Design Studies, 11, 127–140.CrossRef

Cross, N. (1993). A history of design methodology. In M. J. De Vries, N. Cross, & D. P. Grant (Eds.), Design methodology and relationships with science. London: Kluwer.

Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25, 427–441.CrossRef

Curry, L. (1983). An organisation of learning styles and constructs. Eric Document, 235, 185.

Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design Studies, 24, 437–456.CrossRef

Finke, R. (1990). Creative imagery: discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Garcia, R. R., Santos, R. G., Quiros, J. S., & Penin, P. I. A. (2005). Present state of CAD teaching in Spanish universities. Computers and Education, 44, 201–215.CrossRef

Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27, 549–569.CrossRef

Guster, D. (1986). Cognitive style and drafting performance. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 11, 25–40.

Hamade, R. F., Artail, H. A., & Jaber, M. Y. (2007). Evaluating the learning process of mechanical CAD students. Computers and Education, 49, 640–661.CrossRef

Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Jeffries, K. K. (2007). Diagnosing the creativity of designers: individual feedback within mass higher education. Design Studies, 28, 485–497.CrossRef

Jonson, B. (2005). Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Studies, 26, 613–624.CrossRef

Kvan, T., & Yunyan, J. (2005). Students’ learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26, 19–34.CrossRef

Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: the design process demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Mark, E., Martens, B., & Oxman, R. (2003). Preliminary stages of CAAD education. Automation in Construction, 12, 661–670.CrossRef

Martinsen, O., & Kaufmann, G. (2000). The assimilator-explorer cognitive styles and their relationship to affective-motivational orientations and cognitive performances. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: vol 1 cognitive styles (pp. 3–39). Stamford: Ablex.

Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 155–166.CrossRef

Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive style: problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.

Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: an integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7, 251–268.CrossRef

Oxman, R. (2002). The thinking eye: Visual re-cognition in design emergence. Design Studies, 23, 135–164.CrossRef

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Holt, Rinehart & Winston: New York.

Pask, G. (1972). A fresh look at cognition and the individual. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 211–216.CrossRef

Pektas, S. T. (2007). A structured analysis of CAAD education. Open House International, 32(2), 46–54.

Pektas, S. T., & Erkip, F. (2006). Attitudes of design students toward computer usage in design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(1), 79–95.CrossRef

Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., & Austin, E. J. (2002). The reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Styles Analysis test. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 881–891.CrossRef

Richardson, A. (1977). Verbaliser-visualiser: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109–126.

Riding, R. (1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.

Riding, R. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17, 29–49.CrossRef

Riding, R. (2000a). Cognitive style: a review. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: vol 1 cognitive styles (pp. 315–344). Stamford: Ablex.

Riding, R. (2000b). Cognitive style: a strategic approach for advancement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), International perspectives on individual differences: vol 1 cognitive styles (pp. 365–377). Stamford: Ablex.

Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193–216.CrossRef

Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5–29.CrossRef

Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton.

Roberts, A. (2006). Cognitive styles and student progression in architectural design education. Design Studies, 27, 167–181.CrossRef

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

Schon, D. (1985). The design studio: an exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications.

Stones, C., & Cassidy, T. (2007). Comparing synthesis strategies of novice graphic designers using digital and traditional design tools. Design Studies, 28, 59–72.CrossRef

Tomes, A., Oates, C., & Armstrong, P. (1998). Talking design: Negotiating the verbal–visual translation. Design Studies, 19, 127–142.CrossRef

Tweed, C. (2001). The social context of CAAD in practice. Automation in Construction, 10, 617–629.CrossRef

Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. (1971). A manual for embedded figures test. Palo Alto: CA Consulting Psychologists Press.

Titel: Effects of cognitive styles on 2D drafting and design performance in digital media
verfasst von: Sule Tasli Pektas
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2010
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9060-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

A critical evaluation of mathematics courses in architectural education and practice

Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design

Students’ knowledge sources and knowledge sharing in the design studio—an exploratory study

Children’s developing understanding of technology

Difference in time influencing creativity performance between design and management majors

Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education

Premium Partner