Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conceptualisation of technology education within the paradigm of sustainable development

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of how sustainable development might be conceptualised and used to advance technology education practice. It is argued that a conceptualisation of sustainable development based on a combination of weak anthropocentrism and value based approaches within particular social, environmental and economic contexts provides the basis for establishing education for sustainable development (ESD) through technology education. It is argued that such an approach is in accord with the general push for a paradigm shift in curriculum development to meet future social needs. Moral values are proposed to be at the centre of teaching and learning in technology education. Examples of learning activities presented in the article illustrate the position and approach. A second issue addressed in the article concerns the role of teachers in the implementation of ESD. The argument advanced in the article, that this role is critical, is supported by the results of two research projects with in-service and pre-service teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (2004). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. In W. Scott & S. Gough (Eds.), Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review (pp. 63–68). London, Routledge: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, E. M. (1968). Value systems. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Crowell Collier and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATA (Appropriate Technology Africa). (2005). Appropriate Technology Africa—Creating employment. Retrieved February 2008 from http://www.approtechafrica.com/.

  • Appropriate Technology Asia. (2007). Introduction. Retrieved February 2008 from http://www.atasia.org.uk/ata.aspx.

  • Barlex, D. (1993). The Nuffield approach to values in design and technology. Design and Technology Teaching, 26(1), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments. Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9–20. doi:10.1080/13504620120109619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breckon, A. (1998). National curriculum review in design and technology for the year 2000. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 3(2), 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, P. (2008). The sufficiency economy at the edges of capitalism. Retrieved February 2008 from http://www.sufficiencyeconomy.org/en/.

  • Campbell, W. J., McMeniman, M., & Baikaloff, N. (1992). Visions of a desirable future Australian society. New Horizons in Education, 87, 17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, C (2003). A primer on sustainable technology and development. Retrieved 25 November 2004 from http://www.sustainable.gatech.edu/resources/ISTDPrimer_1_7_02.pdf.

  • CAT (Centre for Appropriate Technology). (2007). Home page. Retrieved March 2008 from http://www.icat.org.au/.

  • Coles, R., & Norman, E. (2005). An exploration of the role values play in design decision-making. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 155–171. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8274-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datschefski, E. (2004a). Biothinking for sustainable design and business vitality—pd. Retrieved March 2007 from http://biothinking.com/pd.htm.

  • Datschefski, E. (2004b). Biothinking for sustainable design and business vitality—top40. Retrieved March 2007 from http://www.biothinking.com/top40.htm.

  • DES/WO. (1988). Summary of interim report of the National Curriculum Design and Technology working group. London: Author.

  • de Vries, M. (2005). The nature of technological knowledge: Philosophical reflections and educational consequences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 149–154. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8276-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1990). The technological bluff (trans: Bromiley, G. W.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: W.B. Eerdmans (Original work published 1987).

  • Elshof, L. (2005). Teacher’s interpretation of sustainable development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 173–186. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8277-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum for the Future. (2006). Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/aboutus/sd_page170.aspx.

  • Gatto, J. T. (1991). Dumbing us down: The hidden curriculum of compulsory education. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. (1970). New reformation: Notes of a neolithic conservative. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a rational society. (trans: Shapiro, J. J.). London: Heinemann (Original work published 1968).

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity. New German Critique, NGC, 22, 3–14. doi:10.2307/487859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., & Denniss, R. (2006). Affluenza: When too much is never enough. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heselink, F., & Goldstein, W. (2000). The role of IUCN—the World Conservation Union—in shaping education for sustainability. In K. A. Wheeler & A. P. Bijur (Eds.), Education for a sustainable future: A paradigm of hope for the 21st century (pp. 123–141). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. B., Wilson, S., & Watson, K. (2003). Learning ecology—A new approach to learning and transforming ecological consciousness: experiences from social ecology in Australia. In E. O’Sullivan & M. Taylor (Eds.), Transforming practices: Learning towards ecological consciousness. New York: Palgrave Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, I., & Conway, B. (1999). Investigating values in secondary design and technology education. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(3), 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J (2005). Education for sustainable development: A briefing paper for the Teacher Training Agency. Final draft June 2005.

  • Huckle, J., & Sterling, S (2005). Education for sustainability: An invitation to join a debate. Retrieved June 2006 from http://john.huckle.org.uk/publications_downloads.jsp.

  • IUCN, UNEP, & WWF. (1991). Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. Switzerland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (2001). Technological forms of life. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 105–120. doi:10.1177/02632760122051661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1991). Aspects of national curriculum: Design and technology. New York: NCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFay, R. (2006). An ecological critique of education. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 11(1), 35–45. doi:10.1080/13644360500503290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Conflicts of interest: An indispensable element of education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/13504620601122566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (trans: Bennington, G. & Massumi, B.). Manchester: Manchester University Press (Original work published 1979).

  • Maclean, R. (2007). Education for sustainable development: Lessons from the private sector. The keynote address for the 12th International Business Forum 2007: Business and the Millennium Development Goals: Business Engagement for Governance, Washington, 8–10 October, 2007.

  • Marashian, A. (2006). Design for life. Another magazine for men and women. Issue 10, Spring/Summer 2006, p. 136.

  • Mathews, F. (1994). The ecological self. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, S. (1997). Value judgements: Evaluating design—A Scottish perspective on a global issue. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 3(3), 259–278. doi:10.1023/A:1008825219627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J., & Carmody, M. (1996). Working within the framework of Aboriginal culture: Indigenous initiatives for sustainable development through landcare. In P. Austin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Permaculture Conference & Convergence. Designing for a sustainable future. Perth & Bridgetown, Western Australia, September 27–October 7. Retrieved June 2007 from http://www.rosneath.com.au/ipc6/ch06/morrison/index.html.

  • Oser, F. K. (1994). Moral perspectives on teaching. Review of research in education, 20, 57–127. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, W. C., Ninomiya, A., & Cogan, J. (1999). Educating world citizens: Toward multinational curriculum development. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 117–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. M. (1968). On the concept of value-commitments. Sociological Inquiry, 38, 135–159. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1968.tb00679.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2004). Sustainability: Towards systematic approach for its conceptualisation in technology education. In J. Lebeame (Ed.), Purposes and assessments within technology education. International, AEET conference, Paris, March 2004, http://membres.lycos.fr/aeet/ (English and French translation).

  • Pavlova, M. (2006a). Comparing perspectives: Comparative research in technology education. In M. de Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 19–32). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2006b). Do we value values in technology education? In H. E. Middleton & M. Pavlova (Eds.), Values in technology education. Proceedings of the 4th International Technology Education Research Conference (pp. 248–257). Brisbane: Centre for Learning Research, Griffith University.

  • Pavlova, M. (2006c). Education for sustainable development: The nature of the issue in the multicultural world. In P. Ruohotie & R. Maclean (Eds.), Communication and learning in the multicultural world (pp. 377–397). Hameenlinna: University of Tampere Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2006d). Technology education for sustainable futures. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 11(2), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlova, M. (2007). Some practical solutions for achieving the ideals of sustainability: A case study of a technology teacher education program. Paper presented at the 1st European Conference on Education for Sustainable Development. Orestiada-Soufli, Greece, 5–7 October 2007.

  • Pavlova, M. (2008). Technology and vocational education: A framework for the development of teaching approaches and resources for education for sustainable development. In J. Fien, R. Maclean & M. G. Park (Eds.), Work, learning and sustainable development: Opportunities and challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piboolsravut, P. (2004). Sufficiency economy. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 21(1), 127–134. doi:10.1355/AE21-1H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J., & Lubben, F. (in press). The social agenda of education for sustainable development within design & technology: The Case of the Sustainable Design Award. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9076-2

  • PRé Consultants. (2008a). Eco design/design for environment. Retrieved January 2008 from http://www.pre.nl/ecodesign/default.htm.

  • PRé Consultants. (2008b). Life cycle analysis. Retrieved January 2008 from http://www.pre.nl/life_cycle_assessment/default.htm.

  • Prime, G. M. (1993). Values in technology: Approaches to learning. Design and Technology Teaching, 26(1), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (2001). Education as a moral practice. Journal of Moral Education, 30(2), 101–112. doi:10.1080/03057240120061360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, K. E. (1970). Beliefs and values. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. London: Blond& Briggs Ltd. Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? The Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelehov, A. M. (Ed.). (2002). Osnovnue polozhenija startegii ustoichivogo razvitija Rossii [Main fundamentals of the strategy of sustainable development of Russia]. Retrieved 2004 from the web: http://www.duma.gov.ru/sustainable/strategy.htm.

  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education, re-visioning learning and change. Dartington: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S (2004). Linkingthinking. Crief: WWF. Retrieved May 2006 from http://www.wwf.org.uk/core/about/scotland/sc_0000001453.asp.

  • Sustainable Design Award. (2004). Sustainable design awards online. Retrieved May +2006 from www.sda-uk.org.

  • Sustainable Technology Education Project. (n.d.). Welcome to STEP. Retrieved January 2006 from www.stepin.org.

  • Tarnas, R. (1991). The passion of the western mind: Understanding the ideas that have shaped our world view. New York: Ballantibe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennenbaum, J. (2005). Eurasian infrastructure and the nöosphere. February issue: Executive Intelligence Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tungaraza, F., & Sutherland, M. (2005). Capturing the minds of a lost and lonely generation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 187–198. doi:10.1007/s10798-005-8279-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (in press). TRIZ/ASIT—Problem solving strategies for education and sustainable design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-008-9080-6

  • Ukaz (1996). Ukaz prezidenta RF “O kontseptsii perehoda Rossiskoi Federatsii k ustoichivomu razvitiyu” [The decree of the President of the Russian Federations “About the concept of moving of the Russian Federation towards sustainable development”]. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 9 April, p. 5.

  • University Leaders for a Sustainable Future. (2001). Retrieved October 2007 from http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires.html.

  • UNESCO. (2001a). Education—Key to a viable future. Retrieved October 2007 from www.unesco.org/education/esd/english/education/role.shtml.

  • UNESCO. (2001b). Beyond basic education to education for sustainable development. Retrieved October 2007 from www.unesco.org/education/esd/english/education/beyond.shtml.

  • UNESCO. (2005). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005–2014. International Implementation Scheme. Draft, January 2005. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development. CSD Theme indicator framework: Social. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isdms2001/table_4.htm, accessed 20 November 2003.

  • United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (2000). Sustainable agri-food production and consumption forum : GOOD PRACTICES—possible solutions life cycle analysis. Retrieved October 2007 from http://www.agrifood-forum.net/practices/lca.asp.

  • Vernadsky, V. I. (1945). The biosphere and the nöosphere. American Scientist, 33, 1–12. Retreived March 2008 from http://larouchepub.com/other/2005/site_packages/vernadsky/3207bios_and_noos.html.

  • Webster, K. (2004). Rethink, refuse, reduce… education for sustainability in a changing world. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, K. (2007). Hidden sources: Understanding natural systems is the key to an evolving and aspirational ESD. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 37–43. doi:10.1177/097340820700100109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment, Development (The Brundtland Commission). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Pavlova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlova, M. Conceptualisation of technology education within the paradigm of sustainable development. Int J Technol Des Educ 19, 109–132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9073-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9073-5

Keywords

Navigation