Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2/2013

01.05.2013

A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment

verfasst von: Carol B. Brandt, Katherine Cennamo, Sarah Douglas, Mitzi Vernon, Margarita McGrath, Yolanda Reimer

Erschienen in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this article we describe a holistic, ecological framework that takes into account the surface structures and pedagogical approaches in the studio and how these elements are connected to the construction of design knowledge: epistemology. In our development of this framework, we came to understand how disciplinary underpinnings and academic culture shape the ways that studio is enacted. Using practice theory, we illustrate our framework with two examples—one in Industrial Design and another in Human Computer Interaction—that demonstrate the ways in which the studio can act as a bridge between academic and professional communities. We came to see the studio as a unique practice community that connects academic and professional contexts. We argue that successful implementation of studio-based learning involves an awareness of disciplinary canons, ontological approaches to knowledge, and the academic constraints on studio-based approaches to learning.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Ankiewicz, P., & De Swardt, E. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 117–141.CrossRef Ankiewicz, P., & De Swardt, E. (2006). Some implications of the philosophy of technology for science, technology and society (STS) studies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 117–141.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Johassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Johassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Barab, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowledge from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3–13.CrossRef Barab, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowledge from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.CrossRef Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bayer, H. (1975). Bauhaus 1919–1928. New York: Museum of Modern Art. Bayer, H. (1975). Bauhaus 1919–1928. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4–5), 311–356.CrossRef Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4–5), 311–356.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 61–70.CrossRef Boylan, M. (2010). Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 61–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brocato, K. (2009). Studio based learning: Proposing, critiquing, iterating our way to person-centeredness for better classroom management. Theory into Practice, 48, 138–146.CrossRef Brocato, K. (2009). Studio based learning: Proposing, critiquing, iterating our way to person-centeredness for better classroom management. Theory into Practice, 48, 138–146.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRef Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Carvalho, J., & Dong, A. (2009). Legitimating design: A sociology of knowledge account of the field. Design Studies, 30, 483–502.CrossRef Carvalho, J., & Dong, A. (2009). Legitimating design: A sociology of knowledge account of the field. Design Studies, 30, 483–502.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992a). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604.CrossRef Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992a). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992b). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of the mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33.CrossRef Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992b). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of the mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Davies, T., & Elmer, R. (2001). Learning in design and technology: The impact of social and cultural influences on modeling. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 163–180.CrossRef Davies, T., & Elmer, R. (2001). Learning in design and technology: The impact of social and cultural influences on modeling. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 163–180.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.CrossRef Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274.CrossRef Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer, G. (2005). From reflective practitioners to reflective communities. Proceedings of the HCI International Conference (HCII), Las Vegas, July 22–27. Fischer, G. (2005). From reflective practitioners to reflective communities. Proceedings of the HCI International Conference (HCII), Las Vegas, July 22–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottfried, A. C., Sweeder, R. D., Bartolin, J. M., Hessler, J. A., Reynolds, B. P., Stewart, I. C., et al. (2007). Design and implementation of a studio-based general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(2), 265–270.CrossRef Gottfried, A. C., Sweeder, R. D., Bartolin, J. M., Hessler, J. A., Reynolds, B. P., Stewart, I. C., et al. (2007). Design and implementation of a studio-based general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(2), 265–270.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it? In C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, & M. Chorost (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools (pp. 19–35). NY: Routledge. Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it? In C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, & M. Chorost (Eds.), Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools (pp. 19–35). NY: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lave, J. (1997). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In D. Kirshner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 17–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 49(3), 146–154.CrossRef LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 49(3), 146–154.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (Eds.). (1997). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, a subsidiary of Sage Publications. LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (Eds.). (1997). Designing and conducting ethnographic research. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, a subsidiary of Sage Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee, C. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279.CrossRef Lee, C. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in education research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Reimer, Y. J., & Douglas, S. A. (2003). Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education Journal, 13(3), 191–205. Reimer, Y. J., & Douglas, S. A. (2003). Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education Journal, 13(3), 191–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.CrossRef Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications. Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. London: RIBA Publications.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zurück zum Zitat Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156.CrossRef Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Senge, P. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday. Senge, P. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, D. W. (2003). Portrait of the Oxford design studio: An ethnography of design pedagogy. (WCER Working Paper No. 2003-11). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Shaffer, D. W. (2003). Portrait of the Oxford design studio: An ethnography of design pedagogy. (WCER Working Paper No. 2003-11). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Studio mathematics: The epistemology and practice of design pedagogy as a model for mathematics learning (WCER Working Paper Series No. 2005-3). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Shaffer, D. W. (2005). Studio mathematics: The epistemology and practice of design pedagogy as a model for mathematics learning (WCER Working Paper Series No. 2005-3). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, D. W. (2007). Learning in design. In R. A. Lesh, J. J. Kaput, & E. Hamilton (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 99–126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Shaffer, D. W. (2007). Learning in design. In R. A. Lesh, J. J. Kaput, & E. Hamilton (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 99–126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–471.CrossRef Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–471.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment
verfasst von
Carol B. Brandt
Katherine Cennamo
Sarah Douglas
Mitzi Vernon
Margarita McGrath
Yolanda Reimer
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9181-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

    Premium Partner