Skip to main content
Log in

Attention Training in Autism as a Potential Approach to Improving Academic Performance: A School-Based Pilot Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of an attention intervention program (Computerized Progressive Attentional Training; CPAT) in improving academic performance of children with ASD. Fifteen 6–10 year olds with ASD attending a mainstream and a special school were assigned to an experimental (CPAT; n = 8) and active control (computer games; n = 7) group. Children were assessed pre- and post-intervention on measures of behavioural symptoms, cognitive skills and academic performance. The intervention was conducted in school twice a week for 8 weeks. Children in the CPAT group showed cognitive and academic improvements over and above the active control group, while children in both groups showed improvements in behaviour. Results suggest that attention training is a feasible approach to improving academic performance in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aman, M. G., Novotny, S., Samango-Sprouse, C., Lecavalier, L., Leonard, E., Gadow, K. D., … Chez, M. (2004). Outcome measures for clinical drug trials in autism. CNS Spectrums, 9(1), 36–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th edn). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antshel, K. M., Zhang-James, Y., Wagner, K., Ledesma, A., & Faraone, S. V. (2016). An update on the comorbidity of ASD and ADHD: A focus on clinical management. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 16(3), 279–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bebko, J. M., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. E. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroup results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 19–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte, M. K., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003a). Functional anatomy of impaired selective attention and compensatory processing in autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 651–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte, M. K., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003b). Anatomic dissociation of selective and suppressive processes in visual attention. NeuroImage, 19(1), 180–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardini, S., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Smith, T. J., & Avramides, K. (2012). Building autonomous social partners for autistic children. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 46–52. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Webster, R. (2009). The effect of support staff on pupil engagement and individual attention. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 661–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosseler, A., & Massaro, D. W. (2003). Development and evaluation of a computer-animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33(6), 653–672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children’s mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. A. (1994). Selective attention deficits in persons with autism: Preliminary evidence of an inefficient attentional lens. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(3), 535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, S. L., & Mayes, S. D. (2005). Processing speed in children with clinical disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, R. P. (1990). Intelligence and reading ability in grades 2–12. Intelligence, 1, 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabani, E., & Hommel, B. (2014). Visuospatial processing in children with autism: No evidence for (training-resistant) abnormalities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(9), 2230–2243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, C., Kohls, G., Troiani, V., Brodkin, E. S., & Schultz, R. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 231–239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, H. M., & Lin, Y. H. (2007). Mathematical ability of students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism a review of literature. Autism: The International jouRnal of Research and Practice, 11(6), 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, Y. L., Gau, S. F., Shang, C. Y., Chiu, Y. N., Tsai, W. C., & Wu, Y. Y. (2015). Visual memory and sustained attention impairment in youths with autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Medicine, 45(11), 2263–2273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, Y. L., Gau, S. S. F., Chiu, Y. N., Tsai, W. C., Shang, C. Y., & Wu, Y. Y. (2014). Impaired sustained attention, focused attention, and vigilance in youths with autistic disorder and Asperger’s disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(7), 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chlebowski, C., Green, J. A., Barton, M. L., & Fein, D. (2010). Using the childhood autism rating scale to diagnose autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 787–799.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielski, K. T., Courchesne, E., & Elmasian, R. (1990). Effects of focused selective attention tasks on event-related potentials in autistic and normal individuals. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75(3), 207–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S. M., Kiely, P. M., Crewther, D. P., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. G. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G., Munson, J., Estes, A., Osterling, J., McPartland, J., Toth, K., & Abbott, R. (2002). Neurocognitive function and joint attention ability in young children with autism spectrum disorder versus developmental delay. Child Development, 73(2), 345–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. C., & Ho, H. H. (2004). The very early identification of autism: Outcome to age 41/2–5. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(4), 367–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsabbagh, M., Volein, A., Holmboe, K., Tucker, L., Csibra, G., Baron-Cohen, S., & Johnson, M. H. (2009). Visual orienting in the early broader autism phenotype: Disengagement and facilitation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 637–642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, E., Baines, S., Allerton, L., & Welch, V. (2010). Health inequalities and people with learning disabilities in the UK: 2010. Durham: Improving Health & Lives: Learning Disabilities Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, L. C., Thiessen, E. D., Godwin, K. E., Dickerson, J. P., & Fisher, A. V. (2015). Endogenously and exogenously driven selective sustained attention: Contributions to learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 138, 126–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, A., Rivera, V., Bryan, M., Cali, P., & Dawson, G. (2011). Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(8), 1044–1052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, L. G., & Belleville, S. (2012). Training of attentional control in mild cognitive impairment with executive deficits: Results from a double-blind randomised controlled study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(6), 809–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B., Boles, M. B., Goodwyn, F. D., & Flores, M. M. (2014). Efficacy of handheld electronic visual supports to enhance vocabulary in children with ASD. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, H. M., Corbett, B., & Solomon, M. (2009). The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 74–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, H. M., Luman, M., & Van Meel, C. S. (2008). What’s in a game: The effect of social motivation on interference control in boys with ADHD and autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(8), 848–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, O., Ashwin, E., Granader, Y., McClintock, S., Day, K., Leggett, V., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2010). Enhancing emotion recognition in children with autism spectrum conditions: An intervention using animated vehicles with real emotional faces. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(3), 269–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, O., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Systemizing empathy: Teaching adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism to recognize complex emotions using interactive multimedia. Development and Psychopathology, 18(2), 591–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Booth, R., Charlton, R., & Hughes, C. (2006). Executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examining profiles across domains and ages. Brain and Cognition, 61(1), 25–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetzroni, O. E., & Shalem, U. (2005). From logos to orthographic symbols: A multilevel fading computer program for teaching nonverbal children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(4), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. L. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, C. L., Cumpata, K., Klohr, C., Gaetke, S., Artner, A., Johnson, H., & Dobbs, S. (2014). Effects of exergaming on executive function and motor skills in children with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(1), 57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 59(1), 12.

  • Kasari, C., & Smith, T. (2013). Interventions in schools for children with autism spectrum disorder: Methods and recommendations. Autism, 17, 254–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keehn, B., Müller, R. A., & Townsend, J. (2013). Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(2), 164–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, D., Webster, A., & Ridley, G. (2016). How well are children with autism spectrum disorder doing academically at school? An overview of the literature. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 20(3), 276–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L., Anthony, L. G., Naiman, D. Q., Cannon, L., Wills, M. C., Luong-Tran, C., … Wallace, G. L. (2014). Randomized controlled effectiveness trial of executive function intervention for children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 55(4), 374–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, K. A., MacSween, J., Vander Wekken, S., & Gruppuso, V. (2010). Investigating the efficacy of an attention training programme in children with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 13(6), 413–422.

  • Kinnealey, M., Pfeiffer, B., Miller, J., Roan, C., Shoener, R., & Ellner, M. L. (2012). Effect of classroom modification on attention and engagement of students with autism or dyspraxia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(5), 511–519.

  • Knight, V., McKissick, B. R., & Saunders, A. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(11), 2628–2648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., & Bryson, S. (2004). Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1115–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luna, B., Doll, S. K., Hegedus, S. J., Minshew, N. J., & Sweeney, J. A. (2007). Maturation of executive function in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 61(4), 474–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, W., & Lai, M. C. (2016). Annual research review: The role of the environment in the developmental psychopathology of autism spectrum condition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 271–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., Rinehart, N., Wilding, J., & Cornish, K. (2013). The role of attention in the academic attainment of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(9), 2147–2158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., Rinehart, N. J., Wilding, J., & Cornish, K. (2015). Attention and basic literacy and numeracy in children with autism spectrum disorder: A one-year follow-up study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2007). Learning, attention, writing, and processing speed in typical children and children with ADHD, autism, anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder. Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 469–493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, P. (1995). Joint attention and social emotional approach behaviour in children with autism. Development and Psychopathology, 7(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. M., Christakou, A., Daly, E. M., Ecker, C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K. (2014). Abnormal functional activation and maturation of fronto-striato-temporal and cerebellar regions during sustained attention in autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(10), 1107–1116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., Clarke, P., Wright, B., & Williams, C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 36(7), 911–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2011). Reward reduces conflict by enhancing attentional control and biasing visual cortical processing. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 23(11), 3419–3432.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, S., Charman, T., Faulkner, R., Ragan, J., Wallace, S., & Wittemeyer, K. (2013). Commentary–bridging the research and practice gap in autism: The importance of creating research partnerships with schools. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 17(3), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(1), 51–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, R. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(4), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, A., Condillac, R. A., Freeman, N. L., Dunn-Geier, J., & Belair, J. (2005). Multi-site study of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) in five clinical groups of young children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(5), 625–634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plaisted, K., Swetteham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local processing in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 733–742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). Influencing brain networks: Implications for education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 99–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiner, D. L., Murray, D. W., Skinner, A. T., & Malone, P. S. (2010). A randomized trial of two promising computer-based interventions for students with attention difficulties. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 38(1), 131–142.

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2008). Raven’s Educational: Coloured Progressive Matrices and Crichton Vocabulary Scale Manual. London: NCS Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Section 2: Coloured Progressive Matrices (with US Norms) Manual for the Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B. J., Brereton, A. V., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2002). A neurobehavioral examination of individuals with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder using a fronto-striatal model of dysfunction. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(2), 164–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sampanis, D. S., Mevorach, C., Shalev, L., Mohammed, S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Reducing cognitive deficits after stroke through computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT): A pilot study. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation—International, 2(7), 1058

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., Johnson, K. A., Garavan, H., Gill, M., & Gallagher, L. (2008). A review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging research in autistic spectrum disorders: Attention, inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E. C., Reichler, R., & Renner, B. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E. C., Reichler, R. J., DeVellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 91–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalev, L., Tsal, Y., & Mevorach, C. (2007). Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: Effective direct intervention for children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 13(4), 382–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(8), 921–929.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P., & Shalev, L. (2013). The role of sustained attention and display medium in reading comprehension among adolescents with ADHD and without it. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 431–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C., & Bavelier, D. (2012). The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S30-S48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tachimori, H., Osada, H., & Kurita, H. (2003). Childhood autism rating scale-Tokyo version for screening pervasive developmental disorders. Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 57, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. A. (1980). Feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsal, Y., Shalev, L., & Mevorach, C. (2005). The diversity of attention deficits in ADHD the prevalence of four cognitive factors in ADHD versus controls. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(2), 142–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verte, S., Geurts, H. M., Roeyers, H., Oosterlaan, J., & Sergeant, J. A. (2006). Executive functioning in children with an autism spectrum disorder: Can we differentiate within the spectrum? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(3), 351–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vries, M., Prins, P. J., Schmand, B. A., & Geurts, H. M. (2015). Working memory and cognitive flexibility-training for children with an autism spectrum disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(5), 566–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, S. V., & Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2014). The uses of cognitive training technologies in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders. Autism: The International Journal Of Research and Practice, 18(8), 851–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wass, S. V., Scerif, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2012). Training attentional control and working memory: Is younger, better? Developmental Review, 32(4), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitby, P. J. S., & Mancil, G. R. (2009). Academic achievement profiles of children with high functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: A review of the literature. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44(4), 551–560.

  • Yerys, B. E., Hepburn, S. L., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Executive function in preschoolers with autism: Evidence consistent with a secondary deficit. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(6), 1068–1079.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S., Rogers, T., Roberts, W., Brian, J., & Szatmari, P. (2005). Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 23(2), 143–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the research assistants Anjli Pattni, Marianna Ruiz and Polly Brayfield for their hard work assisting the conduction of the intervention and assessments. Mayra Muller Spaniol was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; BEX: 2903/13-0).

Funding

This work was conducted during a scholarship supported by the International Cooperation Program CAPES at the University of Birmingham. Financed by CAPES—Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education within the Ministry of Education of Brazil, BEX: 2903/13-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MMS was the principal researcher, participated in the study design, coordination, performed the measurements, performed the statistical analysis, interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; LS conceived of the study, participated in the design and interpretation of the data; LK participated in the design and coordination of the study; CM conceived of the study, participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayra Muller Spaniol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Interview with Teachers

Preamble

Talk about:

  • Project—aimed at improving basic attentional processes involved in school activities

  • Academic assessment (content they are seeing in class—maths, reading, writing and copying)

  • CARS

  • Preferences for break activities

Pre interview

  • What do you think are their difficulties regarding academic, social, attentional and personal domains?

  • What are your expectations from the training?

Post interview

  • How are they doing academically, socially, personally now?

  • How is their attention in the classroom?

  • Any other comments about the project?

Appendix 2

Quotes from the interviews:

CPAT

“CH11 and CH14 improved in maths, one level up since the beginning of the project” (ST). “CH11 is better at doing tasks, it is easier to get him to work on tasks, and attention has improved” (TA1). “He pays attention to details a lot more” (TA2). “CH14. shows improvement in work boxes, she used to flip, but now seems more attentive and more interested in doing the tasks.” (TA1).

“CH16. still shows some disruptive behaviours, not as much after the project. Making progress in maths, better concentration but still needs some prompting sometimes. Can do more now on his own” (ST). “CH16 has improved; it’s easier to get him to focus in activities” (TA1).

“CH12 has improved concentration and attention skills, he used to get distracted. Maths improved, numbers, English improved, he is progressing really well” (ST). “He is aware of his own behaviour, and is showing better listening skills now” (TA2).

“CH3 is more confident and independent… He does things by himself now. CH3 is showing progress in numeracy, improved focus and concentration but still has good and bad days” (MT1).

“CH1 shows greater academic achievement; more likely to go and talk to people; more focus and attention to the task. More independent and confident, can do tasks on her own and asks questions, better communication and social interactions” (MT2).

“CH5 is concentrating in tasks a bit more, for longer. CH5 is making academic progress; he can concentrate in tasks in class for longer, before it used to be 2 min” (MT3).

“CH6 made some academic progress, just not as much as one could possibly hope for. He’s not quite there yet, so inconsistent, some days are better than others. Lower levels of learning, numbers need to keep going back to adding, taking away, and number recognition. Talks to himself more. Has many social interactions, but always on his terms”. (MT1).

Control

“CH8 is more participative in class, still shows difficulties in doing tasks independently and needs prompting. He is progressing academically in maths but not so much in literacy” (MT3).

“CH4 understands pure maths but has difficulties with shapes and meaning of words and mathematical problems. He is more confident and independent. Shows more stereotyped behaviours, has problems concentrating and still needs prompting to do tasks” (MT1).

“CH9 still needs prompting to pay attention…Same academic performance” (ST). “Attention slips a bit” (TA1). “He gained a lot of confidence, good computer skills, important for life: learning to interact with the computer” (TA2).

“CH10 and CH15 have always been good” (TA1). “CH10 shows good behaviour, progressing in maths, English, good concentration” (ST). “CH15’s behaviour got worse, he is expressing more, communicating more (started to hit). Can concentrate in maths, English not so much, depends on the task needs prompting. Keeps good academic progress not major jump” (ST).

“CH13 improved behaviour in activities, completely different during activities” (TA1). “He can sit and work through tasks but not major progress academically” (ST).

Across Groups

Interestingly, there was a direct comparison between two boys, one from the CPAT and one from the control group, who were from the same classroom, according to MT3: “CH5 is concentrating in tasks a bit more, for longer….CH5 (CPAT) is more focused than CH8 (control). CH8 gets more distracted, still needs prompting and has difficulties in doing tasks independently. CH5 is making academic progress, he can concentrate in tasks in class for longer, before it used to be 2 min”. In particular, TA2 mentioned that all children were showing “smiles on their faces: children have been very enthusiastic to participate” (TA2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spaniol, M.M., Shalev, L., Kossyvaki, L. et al. Attention Training in Autism as a Potential Approach to Improving Academic Performance: A School-Based Pilot Study. J Autism Dev Disord 48, 592–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3371-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3371-2

Keywords

Navigation