Skip to main content
Log in

Frugality, A Positive Principle to Promote Sustainable Development

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thinking and acting in favor of sustainable development is internationally recognized; it is necessary but societies and individuals are slow to adopt an appropriate behavior. International organizations such as World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology recommend to opt for frugality, a principle emphasized to avoid over-consumption and consequently the depletion of natural resources. This article thus examines the principle of frugality by proving that it is not necessarily related to consumption as it is understood since the Enlightenment: we have to take into account the Asian perspective that changes the relationship between humankind and nature, first taking into consideration the good of the whole community. I argue that frugality is not necessarily in conflict with economy but certainly challenging it as expressed by the Indian terms Jugaad or Gandhian: a way of thinking and creating new projects that lead to fruitful solutions for the majority. Therefore I intend to provide a positive definition of frugality as a way of creating new projects that lead to fruitful solutions for the majority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wang and Lin (2009).

  2. COMEST (2005).

  3. “By 2015, COMEST envisages to produce a document that combines the principles and responsibilities already stated by the Commission in 2011. (…) COMEST has already identified a number of principles of relevance for a comprehensive ethical framework in relation to climate change, such as the principles of sustainability; global justice; solidarity of life on earth; resilience; frugality; biological and cultural diversity; integrity as applied to ecosystems; and safeguarding and promoting the interests of present and future generations.” COMEST, “Briefing about the work of UNESCO’s COMEST on a general framework of ethical principles for climate change”, 4.

  4. Kipling (1906).

  5. Sangave (2006).

  6. Zslonai (2008), p. 281.

  7. Tsu (1905), p. 35.

  8. Miler (2008).

  9. Weiming (1998).

  10. René Descartes, Discourse on the Method, Tome 1, part 6.

  11. Nash (1995).

  12. Diderot (1757).

  13. Siounadan et al. (2013), p. 21.

  14. In France, Pierre Rabhi is a famous farmer and writer. Self taught man, he is born in Algeria in 1938. He starts to work in a Parisian factory. A few years later (1959) he and his wife buy a land in a poor French province. His aim is to conciliate the human history with a natural balance. Engaged in an agricultural ecology center, he gives his expertise to young French farmers, to farmers in the Sahel desert and then in several countries in Africa, Middle-east and Eastern-Europe. At the request of the U.N. he prepares in 1998 some concrete proposals for the implementation of his plan for the Agreement on action against desertification (CCD).

  15. Rabhi (2008), p. 91.

  16. Pierre Rabhi, ibid. p. 93.

  17. Rabhi (2008), p. 118.

  18. Ibid p. 98.

  19. In 2006, the Movement for Earth and Humanism (Mouvement pour la Terre et l’Humanisme) created in 2002 for the presidential election in France becomes Hummingbird Movement (Association Colibri). The movement’s choice of name comes from the favorite legend of Pierre Rabhi. This legend also inspired the founder of the Green belt movement, Wangari Maathai, Kenyan environmental and politician activist, Nobel peace prize laureate. This South American story narrates that a day a huge wildfire was devastating the primal forest. Disconcerted, the entire animals were watching the disaster happening. The hummingbird was active for its part. He was carrying few drops of water in his beak to throw them on the fire. An armadillo annoyed by this pathetic agitation told him: "are you insane, hummingbird? Do you believe that you will truly extinguish the wildfire with these drops"? And the hummingbird to answer: "I do my fair share of the work".

  20. Anzieu (1995).

  21. Griffin (1998).

  22. Gambrel and Cafaro (2010), p. 88.

  23. COMEST (2014).

  24. Pepper et al. (2009).

  25. Lastovicka et al. (1999), p. 88.

  26. Radjou et al. (2012), p. 4.

  27. Gandhi (1935).

  28. Platt (2012). http://theinstitute.ieee.org/career-and-education/career-guidance/introducing-gandhian-engineering573.

  29. Voltaire (1918).

References

  • Anzieu, D. (1995). Le moi-peau. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMEST. (2005). The precautionary principle. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • COMEST. (2014). Briefing about the work of UNESCO’s COMEST on a general framework of ethical principles for climate change. Paris, UNESCO, December 4, 2014. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002310/231082E.pdf.

  • Diderot, D. (1757). “Frugalité”, Encyclopédie, Paris, Briasson

  • Gambrel, J. C., & Cafaro, P. (2010). The virtue of simplicity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1935). Young India. Bombay, June 22 1935.

  • Griffin, J. (1998). Is frugality a virtue? If not an end in itself, frugality can lead to a better quality life (Vol. 51). Paris: UNESCO Courier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, R. (1906). The Second Jungle Book. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastovicka, J. L., et al. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miler, J. (2008). Daoism. Oxford: Oneworld publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. A. (1995). Toward the revival and reform of the subversive virtue: Frugality. The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics, 15, 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. (2012). Introducing Gandhian Engineering. The Institute, IEEE, February 2012.

  • Rabhi, P. (2008). Manifeste pour la terre et l’humanisme. Paris: Actes Sud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabhi, P. (2014). Ce que nous dit la nature. Paris: Les éditions du Relie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangave, V. A. (2006). Aspects of Jaina religion. New Delhi: Bharatiya Jnanpith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siounadan, N., Hébel, P., & Colin, J. (2013). Va-t-on vers une frugalité choisie? Paris, CREDOC, no. 302.

  • Tsu, L. (1905). The sayings of Lao Tsu (Lionel Giles, trad.). New York: E. P. Dutton.

  • Voltaire. (1918). Candide (p. 918). New York: Boni and Liveright Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., & Lin, X. (2009). Migration of Chinese consumption values: Traditions, modernization and cultural renaissance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiming, T. (1998). Beyond the enlightenment mentality. In M. E. Tucker & J. Berthrong (Eds.), Confucianism and ecology: The interrelation of heaven, earth, and humans. Cambridge: Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zslonai, L. (2008). Buddhist economic strategy. In Frugality: Rebalancing material and spiritual values in economic life (p. 281). Oxford: Peter Lang Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Roiland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roiland, D. Frugality, A Positive Principle to Promote Sustainable Development. J Agric Environ Ethics 29, 571–585 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9619-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9619-6

Keywords

Navigation