Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Prediction of Beef Quality Using Visible and NIR Spectroscopy with Large Data Samples Under Industry Conditions

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Spectroscopy Aims and scope

It is well known that the eating quality of beef has a significant influence on the repurchase behavior of consumers. There are several key factors that affect the perception of quality, including color, tenderness, juiciness, and flavor. To support consumer repurchase choices, there is a need for an objective measurement of quality that could be applied to meat prior to its sale. Objective approaches such as offered by spectral technologies may be useful, but the analytical algorithms used remain to be optimized. For visible and near infrared (VISNIR) spectroscopy, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) is a widely used technique for meat related quality modeling and prediction. In this paper, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) based machine learning approach is presented to predict beef eating quality traits. Although SVM has been successfully used in various disciplines, it has not been applied extensively to the analysis of meat quality parameters. To this end, the performance of PLSR and SVM as tools for the analysis of meat tenderness is evaluated, using a large dataset acquired under industrial conditions. The spectral dataset was collected using VISNIR spectroscopy with the wavelength ranging from 350 to 1800 nm on 234 beef M. longissimus thoracis steaks from heifers, steers, and young bulls. As the dimensionality with the VISNIR data is very high (over 1600 spectral bands), the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) technique was applied for feature extraction and data reduction. The extracted principal components (less than 100) were then used for data modeling and prediction. The prediction results showed that SVM has a greater potential to predict beef eating quality than PLSR, especially for the prediction of tenderness. The infl uence of animal gender on beef quality prediction was also investigated, and it was found that beef quality traits were predicted most accurately in beef from young bulls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. G. Osborne, In "Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry," Wiley (2006).

  2. N. Prieto, R. Roehe, P. Lavín, G. Batten, and S. Andrés, Meat Sci., 83, 175–186 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Starr, Biology: Concepts and Applications, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Workman and J. Shenk, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Agriculture, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA (2004).

  5. D. W. Sun, Hyperspectral Imaging for Food Quality Analysis and Control, Elsevier (2010).

  6. S. Andrés, A. Silva, A. Soares-Pereira, C. Martins, A. Bruno-Soares, and I. Murray, Meat Sci., 78, 217–224 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Prieto, S. Andrés, F. J. Giráldez, A. R. Mantecón, and P. Lavín, Meat Sci., 79, 692–699 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Yang, Q. Meng, L. Ren, Z. Zhou, and X. Xie, Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 30, 685 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Rosenvold, E. Micklander, P. W. Hansen, R. Burling-Claridge, M. Challies, C. Devine, and M. North, Meat Sci., 82, 379–388 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L. E. Jeremiah and D. M. Phillips, Meat Sci., 55, 493–502 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. D. Shackelford, T. L. Wheeler, and M. Koohmaraie, Meat Sci., 69, 409–415 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. King, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie, Fresh Meat Texture and Tenderness, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Park, Y. R. Chen, W. R. Hruschka, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie, J. Anim. Sci., 76, 2115–2120 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. W. Moss, A. Gorden, K. Matthews, D. Homer, and P. Hadley, Potential of NIR Spectroscopy for Prediction of Tenderness of Beef Sirloin, Southport, UK (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Ripoll, P. Alberti, B. Panea, J. L. Olleta, and C. Sanudo, Meat Sci., 80, 697–702 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. P revolnik, M. Candek-Potokar, and D. Skorjanc, Czech J. Anim. Sci., 49, 500–510 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. R. Rust, D. M. Price, J. Subbiah, G. Kranzler, G. G. Hilton, D. L. Vanoverbeke, and J. B. Morgan, J. Anim. Sci., 86, 211–219 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Rodbotten, B. H. Mevik, and K. I. Hildrum, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 9, 199–210 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. L. Liu, B. G. Lyon, W. R. Windham, C. E. Realini, T. D. D. Pringle, and S. Duckett, Meat Sci., 65, 1107–1115 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. A bdi, In "Encyclopedia of Research Methods for the Social Sciences", Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 792–795 (2003).

  21. M. Kamruzzaman, G. ElMasry, D. W. Sun, and P. Allen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 714, 57–67 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. I. Steinwart and A. Christmann, Support Vector Machines, Springer (2008).

  23. C. J. C. Burges, Geometry and Invariance in Kernel Based Methods, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. R. Craigie, PhD thesis, Massey University (2012).

  25. S. Thompson, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, York (2014).

  26. Y. Bengio, O. Delalleau, and N. Le Roux, The Curse of Dimensionality for Local Kernel Machines, Report 1258, Universite de Montreal (2005).

  27. P. Cortez, M. Portelinha, S. Rodrigues, V. Cadavez, and A. Teixeira, Neural Proces. Lett., 24, 41–51 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. C. Williams, Near-Infrared Technology in the Agricultural and Food Industries, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. Naes, T. Isakson, T. Fearn, and T. Davies, J. Chemometr., 17, 571–572 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Prieto, D. W. Ross, E. A. Navajas, G. R. Nute, R. I. Richardson, J. J. Hyslop, G. Simm, and R. Roehe, Meat Sci., 83, 96–103 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ren.

Additional information

Published in Zhurnal Prikladnoi Spektroskopii, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 141–148, January–February, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiao, T., Ren, J., Craigie, C. et al. Quantitative Prediction of Beef Quality Using Visible and NIR Spectroscopy with Large Data Samples Under Industry Conditions. J Appl Spectrosc 82, 137–144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-015-0076-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-015-0076-1

Keywords

Navigation