Skip to main content
Log in

Financial returns, price determinants, and genre effects in American art investment

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past studies on art investment, generally have found that returns are low and risk is high. In this study we find that the return to art investment is more in line with traditional investments and thus the cost for consumption associated with art seems fairly small. Employing a large sample of paintings by 66 American artists sold at auction between 1971–1992, average returns are found to be over 9 per cent and 3 per cent in nominal and real terms, respectively. The model employs a log linear price regression estimated by pooled cross section and time series data, and allows rates of return as well as hedonic values for various painting and auction attributes to be estimated. These include size, media, age of execution, authenticity of the work, and auction month and house. In addition, rates of return are differentiated by artist, time period of investment, price range and genre of the painting. The findings indicate significant sensitivity of rates of return to these data stratifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnello, R. J. (1994) “Price Determinants and Investment Returns for Art: Evidence from Paintings Auctions”. Working Paper No. 94-3, University of Delaware.

  • Anderson, R. C. (1974) “Paintings as an Investment”. Economic Inquiry 3: 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1990) “A Survey of the World Art Market”. The Economist Dec. 22: 3–15.

  • Ashenfelter, O. (1989) “How Auctions Work for Wine and Art”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashenfelter, O. and Genesove, D. (1992) “Testing for Price Anomolies in Real Estate Auctions”. American Economic Review 82(3): 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1986) “Unnatural Value: or Art as Floating Crap Game”. American Economic Review 76(2): 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buelens, N. and Ginsburgh, V. (1993) “Revisiting Baumol’s ‘Art as Floating Crap’”. European Economic Review 37: 1351–1371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanel, O., Gérard-Varet, L. A., and Ginsburgh, V. (1996) “The Relevance of Hedonic Price Indices: the Case of Paintings”. Journal of Cultural Economics 20(1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currier, W. T. (1991) Currier’s Price Guide to American Artists (1645-1945) at Auction. Currier Publications, Brokton, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Barre, M., Docclo, S., and Ginsburgh, V. (1994) “Returns of Impressionist, Modern, and Contemporary European Painters, 1962–1991”. Annales d’ Économie et de Statistique 35: 143–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. and Pommerehne, W. W. (1988) “Is Art Such a Good Investment?”. The Public Interest 91: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. and Pommerehne, W. W. (1989) “Art Investment: An Empirical Inquiry”. Southern Economic Journal 56(2): 396–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V. and Jeanfils, P. (1995) “Long-Term Comovements in International Markets for Paintings”. European Economic Review 38: 538–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. N. (1993) “Accounting for Taste: Art and the Financial Markets Over Three Centuries”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1370–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grampp, W. D. (1989) Pricing the Priceless: Art, Artists and Economics. Basic Books, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbersen, R. and Palmquist, R. (1980) “Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semi-Logarithmic Equations”. American Economic Review 70(3): 474–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hislop, R. (ed.) (1971–1992) The Annual Art Sales Index. Art Sales Index LTD, Surrey, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson R. G. and Sinquefield, R. A. (1995) Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation, 1995 Yearbook. In Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe, 1996, Corporate Finance, 4th edition, pp. 231–232.

  • Krasker, W. S. (1979) “The Rate of Return for Storing Wines”. Journal of Political Economy 87(6): 1363–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesando, J. E. (1993) “Art as an Investment: The Market for Modern Prints”. American Economic Review 83(5): 1075–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louargand, M. A. and McDaniel, J. R. (1991) “Price Efficiency in the Art Market”. Journal of Cultural Economics 15(2): 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, E. (1971) International Auction Records. Vol. 5, Mayer and Archer Fields, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitlinger, G. (1961) The Economics of Taste: The Rise and Fall of the Picture Market, 1760–1960. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitlinger, G. (1970) The Economics of Taste: The Art Market in the 60s. Barrie and Jenkins Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. P. (1977) “The Monetary Appreciation of Paintings”, Journal of Political Economy 85(5): 1021–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellman, M. D. (1986) The American Art Analog. Chelsea House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agnello, R.J., Pierce, R.K. Financial returns, price determinants, and genre effects in American art investment. J Cult Econ 20, 359–383 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-0383-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-005-0383-0

Key words

Navigation