Skip to main content
Log in

The Strengths Assessment Inventory: Reliability of a New Measure of Psychosocial Strengths for Youth

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new measure, the Strengths Assessment Inventory—Youth self-report (SAI-Y), was recently developed to assess the strengths of children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 18 years. The SAI-Y differs from similar measures in that it provides a comprehensive assessment of strengths that are intrinsic to the individual as well as strengths associated with an individual’s interaction with his or her environment. Based on over 10 years of test development as well as previous research, the 120 items of the SAI-Y contribute to 11 content scales (e.g., Strengths at Home) and 12 empirical scales (e.g., Commitment to Family Values). The purpose of the current report is to describe the procedure that guided the development of the SAI-Y coupled with an initial study of the psychometric properties of the instrument. The SAI-Y was administered to 572 elementary and secondary school students of which 455 also completed the measure following a one- to two-week interval. Based on this data, the following psychometric properties were examined: internal consistency, standard error of measurement, and test–retest reliability. Overall, results indicated that the SAI-Y demonstrates acceptable to good levels of reliability and may be a valuable addition to current measures that assess aspects of positive functioning. Ongoing research projects and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beutler, L. E., Groth-Maranat, G., & Rosner, R. (2003). Introduction to the integrative assessment of adult personality. In L. E. Beutler & G. Groth-Maranat (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 1–37). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H. (2004). Behavioral and emotional rating scale (2nd ed.): A strengths-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. (1998). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strengths-based approach to assessment. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. S., Mintzer, L. L., Kisiel, C. L., & Shallcross, H. (1998). Understanding the mental health needs of children and adolescents in residential treatment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 6, 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuaide, S., & Ehrenreich, J. H. (1997). Assessing client strengths. Families in Society, 78, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (6th ed.). New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., & Ostermann, R. F. (2009). Strength-based assessment in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 488–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawana, E., & Brownlee, K. (2009). Making the possible probable: A strength-based assessment and intervention framework for clinical work with parents, children and adolescents. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 90, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawana, E., & Brownlee, K. (2010). The strengths assessment inventory—manual. Thunder Bay, ON: Centre of Excellence for Children and Adolescents with Special Needs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (Ed.). (2006). The strengths perspective in social work practice (4th ed.). Toronto: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Ritschel, L. A., Rand, K. L., & Berg, C. J. (2006). Balancing psychological assessments: Including strengths and hope in client reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 33–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, R. G., & Kilmer, R. P. (2005). Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Brownlee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brazeau, J.N., Teatero, M.L., Rawana, E.P. et al. The Strengths Assessment Inventory: Reliability of a New Measure of Psychosocial Strengths for Youth. J Child Fam Stud 21, 384–390 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9489-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9489-5

Keywords

Navigation