Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Daughter Exclusion in Family Business Succession: A Review of the Literature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In family businesses, succession is very much biased by gender and daughters are almost always excluded as candidates. This paper provides a review of the literature on daughter succession. It finds that daughter exclusion results from an interaction of macro (societal/cultural attitudes toward women) and micro (individual and family) factors that both stereotype and discriminate against the daughter, and ensures that her capabilities and contributions in the business remain largely invisible. However, ascension to leadership and control for daughters can occur under “special circumstances” such as in the absence of male heirs or when the family business encounters a crucial transition or crisis event. Notwithstanding, daughter succession is defined by “complementarity” rather than conflict and offers potential advantages over sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelbaum, S., Audet, L., & Miller, J. (2003). Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, E., Forskey, R., & Reeve, I. (2007). Farm succession and inheritance—comparing Australian and international trends. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. (1988). Incongruent hierarchies: Daughters and younger sons as company CEOs. Family Business Review, 1(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus, R. (2004). Family business succession: Suggestions for future research. Family Business Review, 17(2), 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadieux, L., Lorrain, J., & Hugron, P. (2002). Succession in women-owned family businesses: A case study. Family Business Review, 15(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J., Chua, J., & Sharma, P. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P. (1997). Women in family business. Family Business Review, 10(4), 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curimbaba, F. (2002). The dynamics of women’s roles as family business managers. Family Business Review, 15(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, D., Hoffman, J., & Smith, A. (2004). Leader succession: Does gender matter? The Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 25(8), 678–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, J. (2008). Themes and trends of Journal of Family and Economic Issues: A review of twenty years (1988–2007). Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29, 496–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C. (1989). Understanding of father–daughter and father–son dyads in family-owned businesses. Family Business Review, 2(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C. (1992). Integrating the daughter into family business management. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 16(4), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C. (1998). Women’s pathways to participation and leadership in the family-owned firm. Family Business Review, 11(3), 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C., Dupuis, J., Richer, F., & St.-Cry, L. (1995). Factors that influence the next generation’s decision to take over the family farm. Family Business Review, 8(2), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Carli, L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M., Winter, M., Miller, N., & Paul, J. (2001). Adjustment strategies in the family business: Implications of gender and management roles. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(3), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A. (1999). The daughter also rises: How women overcome obstacles and advance in the family-owned business. San Francisco: Rudi Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galiano, A., & Vinturella, J. (1995). Implications of gender bias in the family business. Family Business Review, 8(3), 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Alvarez, E., Lopez-Sintas, J., & Gonzalvo, P. (2002). Socialization patterns of successors in first- to second-generation family businesses. Family Business Review, 15(3), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis-Donovan, J., & Moynihan-Bradt, C. (1990). The power of invisible women in the family business. Family Business Review, III(2), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C. (1988). Like father, like daughter: A new vision for family business. In J. L. Ward (Ed.), Family Business Sourcebook (pp. 518–521). Detroit: Omnigraphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffeth, R., Allen, D., & Barrett, R. (2006). Integration of family-owned business succession with turnover and life cycle models: Development of a successor retention process model. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, H., & Danes, S. (2007). Father–daughter and father–son family business management transfer comparison: Family FIRO model application. Family Business Review, 20(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, W. (1994). Succession in family business a review of the research. Family Business Review, VII(2), 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harveston, P., Davis, P., & Lyden, J. (1997). Succession planning in family business: The impact of owner gender. Family Business Review, 10(4), 373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, B., & Bukowitz, W. (1990). Women, family culture and family business. Family Business Review, 3(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ip, B., & Jacobs, G. (2006). Business succession planning: A review of the evidence. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(3), 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez, R. (2009). Research on women in family firms: Current status and future directions. Family Business Review, 22(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaslow, F. (1998). Handling transitions from mother to son in the family business: The knotty issues. Family Business Review, 11(3), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, N., & Little, H. (1997). Choosing the successor in New Zealand family farms. Family Business Review, 10(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, J. (2009). Spousal roles on motivations for entrepreneurship: A qualitative study in New Zealand. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 372–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korman, M., & Hubler, T. (1988). Odd couples in the family-owned business. In C. Aronoff & J. Ward (Eds.), Family business sourcebook: A guide for families who own businesses and the professionals who serve them (pp. 512–517). Detriot: Omnigraphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansberg, I. (1988). The Succession Conspiracy. In C. Aronoff & J. Ward (Eds.), Family business sourcebook: A guide for families who own businesses and the professionals who serve them (Vol. 1, pp. 98–119). Detroit, Michigan: Omnigraphics Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28(4), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S., Lim, G. H., & Lim, W. S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marotz-Baden, R., & Mattheis, C. (1994). Daughters-in-law and stress in two-generation farm families. Family Relations, 43(2), 132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2001). More jobs for the boys? Succession planning in SMEs. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Steier, L., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philbrick, C., & Fitzgerald, M. (2007). Women in business-owning families: A comparison of roles, responsibilities and predictors of family functionality. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 618–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pounder, J., & Coleman, M. (2002). Women—better leaders than men? In general and educational management it still “all depends”. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(3), 122–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, P., de Mik, L., Anderson, R., & Johnson, P. (1985). The family business. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, S., Simons, R., Boyd, B., & Rafferty, A. (2008). Promoting family: A contingency model of family business succession. Family Business Review, 21(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salganicoff, M. (1990). Women in family businesses: Challenges and opportunities. Family Business Review, 3(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, D. (1988). Advising the family business owner in succession planning: The daughter option. Cleveland State Law Review, 36, 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E. (1999). Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effects of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C., & Danes, S. (2001). Inclusion and control in resort family businesses: A developmental approach to conflict. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., Thomas, G., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organisational levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(2), 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1985). Women in the fishing: The roots of power between the sexes. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 27(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinidad, C., & Normore, A. (2005). Leadership and gender: A dangerous liaison? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(7), 574–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, E., Boshoff, C., & Maas, G. (2005). The influence of successor-related factors on the succession process in small and medium-sized family businesses. Family Business Review, 18(4), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, C., & Dean, M. (2005). An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession. Family Business Review, 18(4), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth profitability and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigal, D., & Ballard-Reisch, D. (1997). Merging family and firm: An integrated systems approach to process and change. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 18(1), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C. Daughter Exclusion in Family Business Succession: A Review of the Literature. J Fam Econ Iss 31, 475–484 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-010-9230-3

Keywords

Navigation