Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The species richness of click beetles in ancient pasture woodland benefits from a high level of sun exposure

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forests support high concentrations of species and beetles in particular are often used to evaluate forest biodiversity. Ancient pasture woodlands are facing a major decline in Europe mainly due to the abandonment of traditional management and subsequent succession. We studied click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in one of the largest central-European remnants of pasture woodland in Lány Game Park (Czech Republic) using flight interception traps placed at standing veteran trees. The gradient of sun-exposure, circumference of stem, height and vitality of tree and tree species were studied in relation to the species richness of click beetles and their ecological groups. Total species richness reached nearly one half of the recently documented fauna in the study area and species accumulations showed us that the majority of species were represented. Most species preferred solitary trees in sun-exposed habitats and avoided shaded trees in closed canopies. The same results were obtained for ecological groups, such as saproxylic and non-saproxylic species, functional groups and guilds. Our results showed that the species richness of one of the most ecologically diverse beetle families, click beetles, benefits from a high level of sun exposure. Thus, the long spatial and temporal continuity of sun-exposed veteran trees could be a good predictor for sustainable forest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander KNA (2008) Tree biology and saproxylic Coleoptera: issues of definitions and conservation language. Rev Ecol 63:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen KA, Le Duc MG, Thompson DJ (2010) Habitat and conservation of the enigmatic damselfly Ischnura pumilio. J Insect Conserv 14:689–700

    Google Scholar 

  • AOPK ČR (2010) Lánská obora. http://www.nature.cz/natura2000-design3/web_lokality.php?cast=1805&akce=karta&id=1000002673. Accessed on 26 Oct 2010

  • Baselga A (2008) Determinants of species richness, endemism and turnover in European longhorn beetles. Ecography 31:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohac J (1999) Staphylinid beetles as bioindicators. Agr Ecosyst Environ 74:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard P, Grebennikov VV, Smith ABT, Douglas H (2009) Biodiversity of Coleoptera. In: Footit RG, Adler PH (eds) Insect biodiversity: science and society. Wiley-Blackwell, UK, pp 265–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Schröder B, Assmann T (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle—A case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Ranius T, Assmann T (2008) An endangered longhorn beetle associated with old oaks and its possible role as an ecosystem engineer. Conserv Biol 22:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A (1984) Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. Accessed on 5 May 2010

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing—an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dušánek V, Mertlik J (2010) Elateridae. Click beetles of the Palearctic region. http://www.elateridae.com. Accessed on 26 Oct 2010

  • Farkač J, Král D, Škorpík M (2005) Red list of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha

  • Foit J (2010) Distribution of early-arriving saproxylic beetles on standing dead Scots pine trees. Agr For Entomol 12:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franc N, Götmark F (2008) Openness in management: hands-off vs partial cutting in conservation forests, and the response of beetles. Biol Conserv 141:2310–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg E, Kirby K, Hall J, Latham J (2007) The ancient woodland concept as a practical conservation tool in Great Britain. J Nat Conserv 15:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goßner M, Engel K, Jessel B (2008) Plant and arthropod communities in young oak stands: are they determined by site history? Biodiv Conserv 17:3165–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MH (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809–2815

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanzák J, Moucha J, Zahradník J (1973) Světem zvířat V. díl (2. část). Bezobratlí. Albatros, Praha

  • Hicks H, Blackshaw RP (2008) Differential responses of three Agriotes click beetle species to pheromone traps. Agr For Entomol 10:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill T, Lewicki P (2007) Statistics methods and applications. StatSoft, Tulsa

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister J, Mihaljevič M, Hošek J (2004) The spread of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in some European oak forests: an effect of nitrogen deposition or successional change? For Ecol Manag 203:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horák J (2011) Response of saproxylic beetles to tree species composition in a secondary urban forest area. Urb For Urb Gree 10:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horák J, Vávrová E, Chobot K (2010) Habitat preferences influencing populations, distribution and conservation of the endangered saproxylic beetle Cucujus cinnaberinus at the landscape level. Eur J Entomol 107:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Horák J, Chumanová E, Hilszczański J (2012) Saproxylic beetle thrives on the openness in management: a case study on the ecological requirements of Cucujus cinnaberinus from Central Europe. Insect Conserv Divers. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00173.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hůla P (2009) Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area. Ochr Přír 1:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelínek J (1993) Check-list of Czechoslovak insects IV (Coleoptera). Fol Heyrovsk 1:1–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson T, Hjältén J, Gibb H, Hilaszczański J, Stenlid J, Ball JP, Alnvi O, Danell K (2007) Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: implications for conservation strategies. For Ecol Manag 242:496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PJ (2002) Family Elateridae Leach, 1815. In: Arnett RH, Thomas MC, Skelley PE, Frank JH (eds) American beetles, vol 2., Polyphaga: Scarabeoidea through Curculionoidea. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 160–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasova M, Vavrova E, Cudlin P (2010) Western Carpathian mountain spruce forest after a windthrow: natural regeneration in cleared and uncleared areas. For Ecol Manag 259:1127–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B (1998) Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiv Conserv 7:749–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila L, Martikainen P, Puntilla P, Yakovlec E (1994) Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on dead birch trunks decayed by different polypore species. Ann Zool Fenn 31:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila L, Martikainen P, Punttila P (1997) Dead trees left in clearcuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodiv Conserv 6:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Komonen A (2007) Are we conserving peripheral populations? An analysis of range structure of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Finland. J Insect Conserv 11:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinov AS, Korotyaev BV, Volkovitsh MG (2009) Insect biodiversity in the Palaearctic region. In: Footit RG, Adler PH (eds) Insect biodiversity: science and society. Wiley-Blackwell, UK, pp 107–162

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Křístek J et al (2002) Ochrana lesů a přírodního prostředí. Matice Lesnická, Písek

    Google Scholar 

  • Laibner S (2000) Elateridae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Kabourek, Zlín

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbladh M, Brunet J, Hannon G, Niklason M, Eliasson P, Eriksson G, Ekstrand A (2007) Forest history as a basis for ecosystem restoration—A multidisciplinary case study in a south Swedish temperate landscape. Restor Ecol 15:284–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF, Fischer J (2008) General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 131:433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Lindelöw Å (2004) Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manag 203:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Lindelow A, Asenblad A (2005) Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodiv Conserv 14:3033–3053

    Google Scholar 

  • Löbl I, Smetana A (2007) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, vol. 4. Elateroidea, Derontoidea, Bostrichoidea, Lymexyloidea, Cleroidea and Cucujoidea. Apollo Books, Svenstrup, Denmark

  • Martikainen P, Kaila L (2004) Sampling saproxylic beetles: lessons from a 10-year monitoring study. Biol Conserv 120:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Kaila L, Punttila P (1996) Intensity of forest management and bark beetles in non-epidemic conditions: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. J Appl Entomol 120:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason WL (2007) Changes in the management of British forests between 1945 and 2000 and possible future trends. Ibis 149:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA, Schroeder M, Ekbom B, Larsson S (2007) Saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures. Divers Distrib 13:418–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertlik J (2010) A review of findings of click-beetle Agriotes gallicus Lacordaire, 1835 and jewel-beetle Anthaxia candens (Panzer, 1792), known from eastern Bohemia (Czech Republic). Elateridarium 4:33–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Moga CI, Hartel T, Öllerer K (2009) Ancient oak wood-pasture as a habitat for the endangered tree pipit Anthus trivialis. Biologia 64:1011–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Goßner M (2007) Single host trees in a closed forest canopy matrix: a highly fragmented landscape? J Appl Entomol 131:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2007) Beetles and conservation. J Insect Conserv 11:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto A, Alexander K (2010) European red list of saproxylic beetles. Publication Office of the EU, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson SG, Baranowski R (1994) Indicators of megatree continuity—Swedish distribution of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae) dependent on hollow trees. Ent Tidskr 115:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Miller SE, Baje L, Balagawi S, Basset Y, Cizek L, Craft KJ, Dem F, Drew RAI, Hulcr J, Leps J, Lewis O, Pokon R, Stewart AJA, Weiblen GD (2010) Guild-specific patterns of species richness and host specialization in plant-herbivore food webs from a tropical forest. J Anim Ecol 79:1193–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Økland B (1996) A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. Eur J Entomol 93:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol Appl 6:594–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker E, Howard JJ (2001) The biology and management of wireworms (Agriotes spp.) on potato with particular reference to the UK. Agr For Entomol 3:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Příhoda J (2008) Odhady škod po orkánu Kyrill (2007) a vichřici Emma (2008) v České Republice. Les Práce 4:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (2006) Woodlands. Collins, London

  • Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiv Conserv 12:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2002) Osmoderma eremita as an indicator of species richness of beetles in tree hollows. Biodiv Conserv 11:931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Hedin J (2001) The dispersal rate of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Oecologia 126:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Jansson N (2000) The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol Conserv 95:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rébl K (2010) Results of faunistic survey of beetles (Coleoptera) in the territory of Protected Landscape Area and Biospheric Reservation Křivoklátsko (Czech Republic). Elateridarium 4:1–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz B (2006) Fine scale distribution of pollinator explains the occurrence of the natural orchid hybrid × Orchis bergonii. Ecoscience 13:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegg K (2001) Saproxylic insect diversity of beech: limbs are richer than trunks. For Ecol Manag 149:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidl J, Bußler H (2004) Ökologische Gilden xylobionter Käfer Deutschlands. Naturschutz Landschaftsplan 36:202–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J (1994) Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Ann Zool Fenn 31:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J, Saaristo L (2000) Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol Conserv 94:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Škoudlínová A (2000) Lánská obora. Okresní úřad Rakovník a Okresní úřad Kladno

  • Spitzer L, Konvicka M, Benes J, Tropek R, Tuf IH, Tufova J (2008) Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol Conserv 141:827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (2002) Openness in management. Nature 418:834–835

    Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Ims RA (2002) The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biol Conserv 106:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Skarpaas O, Ødegaard F (2010) Hollow oaks and beetle conservation: the significance of the surroundings. Biodiv Conserv 19:837–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

  • Tolasch T, Von Vragstein M, Steidle JLM (2007) Sex pheromone of Elater ferrugineus L. (Coleoptera: Elateridae). J Chem Ecol 33:2156–2166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vera FWM (2000) Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vodka S, Konvicka M, Cizek L (2009) Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management. J Insect Conserv 13:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wermelinger B, Flückinger PF, Obrist MK, Duelli P (2007) Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. J Appl Entomol 131:104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zicha O (2010) Biological library—BioLib. http://www.biolib.cz/. Accessed on 18 Dec 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the zoologist of PLA Křivoklátsko A. Hoffmannová, and all of the forest and game managers in the Lány Game Park (LS Lány), especially J. Janda, M. Štrunc, L. Frank and Š. Stanický for their deeply kind support during our study and the permission to access the study sites. E. Chumanová helped with the statistical analyses, A. Kohutka helped in the field, Z.F. Fric had many good ideas for improving this manuscript, T. Rose reviewed the English, two anonymous reviewers provided many good suggestions and editor provided a very careful final revision of the text. This project was funded by the contract PPK-2a/24/10 of non-governmental organization Lesák, o.s. (www.lesak.eu) and a grant from the CZ Ministry of Environment MSM 6293359101 of VÚKOZ, v.v.i. (www.vukoz.cz).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Horák.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horák, J., Rébl, K. The species richness of click beetles in ancient pasture woodland benefits from a high level of sun exposure. J Insect Conserv 17, 307–318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9511-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9511-2

Keywords

Navigation