Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Natal philopatry in four European species of dragonflies (Odonata: Sympetrinae) and possible implications for conservation management

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Europe, the species Sympetrum depressiusculum is classified as vulnerable with a high risk of extinction in the wild. It is a habitat specialist, the presumed main reason for its vulnerability is the destruction of its natural habitats. Other causes of its general extinction are unknown. Published information regarding dispersal rate and philopatry is not available, although these are evolutionary strategies that can play key roles in susceptibility to environmental change. We compared the rate of philopatry in S. depressiusculum and three other related, abundant but not endangered species of the same genus (S. sanguineum, S. striolatum, S. vulgatum). We collected data in a very isolated site in the Czech Republic, more than 100 km distant from another known population of the species. Using exuviae collection (total of 6,157 exuviae) and capture-mark-recapture (total of 2,188 adults marked) methods, we acquired data allowing us to compare the numbers of emerged individuals and adults returning to the maternal site. We found a difference of nearly an order of magnitude between the philopatry of S. depressiusculum and the three other species. While in S. depressiusculum philopatry was almost 100 %, in the other species it was <10 %. We suggest the high rate of philopatry can influence the vulnerability of S. depressiusculum in landscape altered by humans. Strict protection of the natal sites is very important for preserving species having this evolutionary strategy, and reintroductions and translocations should also be undertaken to reduce the extinction risk of this endangered species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RC (2009) Do dragonflies migrate across the western Indian Ocean?. J Trop Ecol 25:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahn V, O’Connor RJ, Krohn WB (2008) Dispersal leads to autocorrelation in animal distributions: a simulation model. Ecol Model 213:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohonak AJ, Jenkins DG (2003) Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Lett 6:783–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80:205–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clobert JE, Danchin ED, Dhondt AA, Nichols J (2001) Dispersal: causes, consequences and mechanisms of dispersal at the individual, Population and Community Level. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KF, Willson KH, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt TN (1999) Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22:524–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooch E, White G (2012) Program MARK: Analysis of data from marked individuals, “a gentle introduction” (11th ed.). http://www.cnr.colostate.edu/~gwhite/mark/mark.html. Accessed 14 May 2012

  • Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of odonata. Harley Books, Colchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dolný A, Bárta D, Waldhauser M, Holuša O, Hanel L (2007) The dragonflies of the Czech Republic: Ecology, Conservation and Distribution. Český svaz ochránců přírody Vlašim, Vlašim

    Google Scholar 

  • Falck J, Johansson F (2000) Patterns in size, sex ratio and time at emergence in a south Swedish population of Sympetrum sanguineum (Odonata). Aquat Insects 22:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster SE, Soluk DA (2004) Evaluating exuviae collection as a management tool for the federally endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana Williamson (Odonata: Cordulidae). Biol Conserv 118:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerken B, Sternberg K (1999) Die exuvien Europaischer libellen—the exuviae of European dragonflies. Arnika & Eisvogel, Hoxter

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2010) Ecological factors determining the density-distribution of Central European dragonflies (Odonata). Eur J Entomol 107:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2011) The effect of ecological determinants on the dispersal abilities of Central European dragonflies (Odonata). Odonatologica 40:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassall C, Thompson DJ (2012) Study design and mark recapture estimates of dispersal. J Insect Conserv 16:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkman VJ, Boudot J-P, Bernard R, Conze K-J, De Knijf G, Dyatlova E, Ferreira S, Jović M, Ott J, Riservato E, Sahlén G (2010) European red list of Dragonflies. IUCN & Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Novak J, Benes J, Fric Z, Bradley J, Keil P, Hrcek J, Chobot K, Marhoul P (2008) The last population of the Woodland Brown butterfly (Lopingaachine) in the Czech Republic: habitat use, demography and site management. J Insect Conserv 12:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkeamäki E, Suhonen J (2002) Distribution and habitat specialization of species affect local extinction in dragonfly Odonata populations. Ecography 25:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: case studies and recent advances. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias A, Olivieri I, Kisdi É (2001) Divergent evolution of dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape. Evolution 55:246–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley SJ (2006) The effects of dispersal and recruitment limitation on community structure of Odonates in artificial ponds. Ecography 29:585–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK, Dhondt AA (1989) Effects of emergence characteristics on longevity and maturation in the dragonfly Sympetrum danae (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Hydrobiologia 171:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK, Dhondt AA (1991) Characteristics of dispersal in sexually mature dragonflies. Ecol Entomol 16:449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AK, Miller PL, Siva-Jothy MT (1984) Pre-copulatory guarding and other aspects of reproductive behaviour in Sympetrum depressiusculum (Sélys) at rice fields in Southern France (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 13:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Padeffke T, Suhling F (2003) Temporal priority and intraguild predation in temporary waters: an experimental study using Namibian desert dragonflies. Ecol Entomol 28:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna [Available from http://www.R-project.org]

  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thompson DJ (2010) The dragonfly delusion: why it is essential to sample exuviae to avoid biased surveys. J Insect Conserv 14:523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Chapin IIIFS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker MH, Wall D (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt EG (2008) Sympetrum depressiusculum (Selys), a southern continental dragonfly depending on artificial habitats in Atlantic northwestern Germany (state of Northrhine-Westphalia) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Not Odonatol 7:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg K, Buchwald R (2000) Die Libellen Baden-Württembergs. Band 2: Großlibellen (Anisoptera). Verlag Eugen Ulmer Gmbh & Co, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoks R, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2012) Evolutionary ecology of Odonata: a complex life cycle perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 57:249–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suhonen J, Hilli-Lukkarinen M, Korkeamäki E, Kuitunen M, Kullas J, Penttinen J, Salmela J (2010) Local extinction of dragonfly and damselfly populations in low- and high-quality habitat patches. Conserv Biol 24:1148–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond (B) 267:139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2005) Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol 6:535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:120–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikelski M, Moskowitz D, Adelman JS, Cochran J, Wilcove DS, May ML (2006) Simple rules guide dragonfly migration. Biol Lett 2:325–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was written in connection with an Institute of Environmental Technologies project, reg. no. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0100, supported by the Research and Development for Innovations Operational Programme financed by the Structural Funds of the Europe Union. This study was funded by Grant No. SGS11/PRF/2011 from the University of Ostrava, and GA FZP No. 42110/1312/3118 from the Internal Grant Agency of Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. We would like to thank Mr. Milan Konvička from the Czech Fishing Association Příbor for helping us with fieldwork and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the earlier versions of the manuscripts. Gale A. Kirking at English Editorial Services edited the manuscript in its near-final form.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, 710 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic

    Aleš Dolný

  2. Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, 710 00, Ostrava, Czech Republic

    Hana Mižičová

  3. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic

    Filip Harabiš

Authors
  1. Aleš Dolný
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hana Mižičová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Filip Harabiš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleš Dolný.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolný, A., Mižičová, H. & Harabiš, F. Natal philopatry in four European species of dragonflies (Odonata: Sympetrinae) and possible implications for conservation management. J Insect Conserv 17, 821–829 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9564-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation