Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of a dung beetle assemblage along a reforestation gradient in Restinga forest

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scarabaeinae dung beetles are indicator insects used in the evaluation of the ecological effects caused by changes in habitat structure and ecosystem integrity resulting from environmental degradation. We compared dung beetle diversity in conserved restinga forests (coastal tropical moist broadleaf forest) and in reforested areas of various ages during the rainy and dry seasons, on the coast of Paraíba State, Brazil. A total of 3,634 individuals comprising 14 species were collected. In the reforested areas there was a gradual increase in species abundance relative to the area’s age, but in the conserved restinga the abundance of individuals was 10–20 times higher than that recorded in areas of recent reforestation. The highest species richness was found in the conserved restinga and in the oldest reforested area (16 years old) during the rainy season. During the dry season, when environmental conditions do not seem to favor adult survival, most of the species were found in the conserved restinga forest. The dung beetle community structure was related to the increases in habitat heterogeneity in the successional processes of the reforested areas. Our results suggest that reforested areas act as a source of and refuge for dung beetle species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andresen E (2003) Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography 26:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo DSD, Lacerda LD (1987) A natureza das restingas. Ciência Hoje 6:42–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Aussenac G (2000) Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Ann For Sci 57:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Louzada J, Parry L, Hernández MIM, Hawes J, Peres CA, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Gardner TA (2010) Improving the design and management of forest strips in human-dominated tropical landscapes: a field test on Amazonian dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 47:711–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierregaard RO Jr, Lovejoy TE, Kapos V, Santos AA, Hutchings RW (1992) The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments: a prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest. Bioscience 42:859–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KS Jr (1997) Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of neotropical forest: insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. J Insect Conserv 1:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambefort Y, Hanski I (1991) Dung beetle population biology. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 36–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerqueira R (1984) Comunidades animais. In: Lacerda LD, Araujo DSD, Cerqueira R, Turcq B (eds) Restingas: origem, estrutura e processos. CEUFF, Niteroi

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc B 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AJ, Holloway JD, Huijbregts H, Krikken J, Kirk-Spriggs AH, Sutton SL (2001) Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern Borneo. J Appl Ecol 38:593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis ALV, van Aarde RJ, Scholtz CH, Delport JH (2003) Convergence between dung beetle assemblages of a post-mining vegetational chronosequence and unmined dune forest. Restor Ecol 11:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carre G, Marquez JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitao PJ, Munkemuller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schroder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endres AA, Creão-Duarte AJ, Hernández MIM (2007) Riqueza e diversidade de Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) da Reserva Biológica Guaribas, Mamanguape, Paraíba, Brasil: uma comparação entre Mata Atlântica e Tabuleiro Nordestino. Rev Bras Entomol 51:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada A, Anzures AD, Coates-Estrada R (1999) Tropical rain forest fragmentation, howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and dung beetles at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Am J Primatol 48:253–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg DB (1999) Aspectos da flora e da vegetação secundária da restinga de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Insula 28:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Favila M, Halffter G (1997) Indicator groups for measuring biodiversity. Acta Zool Mex (ns) 72:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas AVL, Francini RB, Brown KS Jr (2004) Insetos como indicadores ambientais. In: Cullen L Jr, Rudran R, Valladares-Padua C (eds) Métodos de estudos em Biologia da Conservação & Manejo da Vida Silvestre. Editora UFPR & Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza, Curitiba, pp 125–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MNF, Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2008a) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Hernández MIM, Barlow J, Peres CA (2008b) Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for Neotropical dung beetles. J App Ecol 45:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Arellano L (2002) Response of dung beetle diversity to human-induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica 34:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Edmonds WD (1982) The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae): An ecological and evolutive approach. Man and the Biosphere Program, UNESCO, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Ezcurra E (1992) ¿Qué es la biodiversidad? In: Halffter G (ed) La Diversidad Biológica de Iberoamérica, vol 1., Instituto de Ecología ACXalapa, México, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Favila M (1993) The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analysing, inventorying and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rain forest and modified landscapes. Biol Inter 27:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol Mex 12(14):1–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Halffter G, Favila ME, Halffter V (1992) A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forests and derived ecosystems. Folia Entomol Mex 84:131–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski Y (1991) The dung insect community. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández MIM (2007) Besouros escarabeíneos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) da Caatinga paraibana, Brasil. Oecol Bras 11:356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández MIM, Vaz-de-Mello FZ (2009) Seasonal and spatial species richness variation of dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae s. str.) in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol 53:607–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesp PA (1991) Ecological processes and plant adaptations on coastal dunes. J Arid Environ 21:165–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howden AT, Nealis VC (1975) Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISA (2008) Almanaque Brasil Socioambiental. In: Ricardo B, Campanili M (eds) Instituto Socioambiental, Brasília

  • Janzen DH (1983) Seasonal change in abundance of large nocturnal dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) in a Costa Rican deciduous forest and adjacent horse pasture. Oikos 41:274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L, DeVries P, Walla T, Greeney H, Chao A, Ricotta C (2010) Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers Distrib 16:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein BC (1989) Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology 70:1715–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T, Williams N, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:538–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima-Verde EPA, Hernández MIM (2007) Sucessão ecológica em áreas reflorestadas de restingas: respostas da comunidade de borboletas Nymphalidae. In: Bezerra VB (org) Iniciados vol. 12, Ed. UFPB, João Pessoa, pp 13–22

  • Lovejoy TE (1988) Diverse considerations. In: Wilson E (ed) Biodiversity. National Academic Press, Washington, pp 421–427

  • Morellato LPC, Haddad CFB (2000) Introduction: the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biotropica 32:786–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector S, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Gardner TA, Peres CA, Spector S (2009) Co-declining mammals and dung beetles: an impending ecological cascade. Oikos 118:481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Blom T, Niemela J, Joensuu E, Siitonen M (1998) The fragmented Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Rosado SCS, Oliveira Filho AT, Carvalho D (2000) Correlações entre variáveis do solo e espécies Herbáceo-arbustivas de dunas em revegetação no Litoral norte da Paraíba. Cerne 6:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler PY (2005) Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 21:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JMC, Tabarelli M (2000) Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil. Nature 404:72–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector S (2006) Scarabaeine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation. Coleopt Bull 60:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc (2004) STATISTICA (data analysis software system)

  • Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1 defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uehara-Prado M, Fernandes JO, Bello AM, Machado G, Santos AJ, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Freitas AVL (2009) Selecting terrestrial arthropods as indicators of small-scale disturbance: a first approach in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 142:1220–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira L, Louzada JNC, Spector S (2008) Effects of degradation and replacement of southern Brazilian coastal sandy vegetation on the dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Biotropica 40:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vulinec K (2002) Dung beetle communities and seed dispersal in primary forest and disturbed land in Amazonia. Biotropica 34:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeppelini D, Bellini BC, Creão-Duarte AJ, Hernández MIM (2009) Collembola as bioindicators of restoration in mined sand dunes of northeastern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18:1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the project “Ecological Succession and Regeneration of Restingas: Reforestation of Dunes in Mataraca, Paraíba”, financed by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Process number 507127/2004-8), in partnership with the Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Company, which provided financial and logistical support for research development through the Federal University of Paraíba. Biology students Pedro Barreto and Valderêz da Costa received ITI/CNPq scholarships (Scientific Initiation). The Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) awarded a PRO-DOC scholarship to Malva I. M. Hernández through the Regional Graduate Program in Development and the Environment of the Federal University of Paraíba. Comments by anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript. Bianca Delfosse revised the final version of the manuscript. We would like to thank Dr. Fernando Z. Vaz-de-Mello, of the Federal University of Mato Grosso, who confirmed the identification of species.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malva I. M. Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández, M.I.M., Barreto, P.S.C.S., Costa, V.H. et al. Response of a dung beetle assemblage along a reforestation gradient in Restinga forest. J Insect Conserv 18, 539–546 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9645-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9645-5

Keywords

Navigation