Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Enhancing spider families and spider webs in Indian rice fields for conservation biological control, considering local and landscape management

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spiders are omnipresent, occurring in almost all terrestrial habitats. They are generalist predators and important for conservation biocontrol in agricultural fields, helping to reduce pesticide applications. In this study, we examined how spider families and spider web types in rice fields are related to local and landscape management. Samples were taken in differently managed rice fields adjoining either homegarden polycultures or banana monocultures. Furthermore, landscape structure, prey abundance, herb richness and cover were taken into account. The results showed that prey availability explained most of the variation in spiders and their web’s abundance, indicating that spiders in the rice fields can potentially contribute to pest control. Adjacent habitat had no effect on the spider populations, but maintaining fallow fields in the surrounding landscape seems to be a useful measure to promote Erigoninae in rice fields. There was no evidence that local management practices such as fertiliser and pesticide use had an impact on spider families, which appeared to be due to the low level of these inputs. Spider web sampling can complement spider sampling as it detects spiders hidden at the base of the rice tillers, which are likely to be missed by sweep netting. Additionally, tetragnathid webs are easy to observe and thus can be used as an indication for farmers not to spray pesticides as spiders are potentially controlling the pest species. Interviews with farmers made clear that many farmers in the study area showed their interest in management methods that promote biological pest control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano T, Kusumoto Y, Okamura H, Baba YG, Hamasaki K, Tanaka K, Yamamoto S (2011) A macro-scale perspective on within-farm management: how climate and topography alter the effect of farming practices. Ecol Lett 14:1263–1272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arida GS, Heong KL (1994) Sampling spiders during the rice fallow period. Int Rice Res Notes 19:20

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour RA, Rypstra AL (1998) The influence of habitat structure on spider denisty in a no-till soybean agroecosystem. J Arachnol 26:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambaradeniya C, Edirisinghe JP, deSilva DN, Gunatilleke CVS, Ranawana KB, Wijekoon S (2004) Biodiversity associated with an irrigated rice agro-ecosystem in Sri Lanka. Biodivers Conserv 13:1715–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrion AT, Litsinger JA (1995) Riceland spiders of South and Southeast Asia. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrion AT, Villareal SS, Catindig J, Cai D, Yuan QH, Heong KL (2012) The spider fauna in the rice agricultural landscape of Hainan Island, China: composition, abundnace and feeding structure. Asian Life Sci 21:625–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc R Soc B 273:1715–1727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Butt A, Xaaceph M (2015) Functional Response of Oxyopes javanus (Araneidae: Oxyopidae) to Sogatella furcifera (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) in Laboratory and Mesocosm. Pak J Zool 47:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough Y, Kruess A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2005) Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales. J Biogeogr 32:2007–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entling W, Schmidt MH, Bacher S, Brandl R, Nentwig W (2007) Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EOL (2014) Encyclopedia of Life. http://eol.org/. Accessed 15 Sep 2014

  • Foelix RF (2011) Biology of spiders, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • George J, Krishnaprasad P (2006) Agrarian distress and farmers’ suicide in the tribal Distric of Wayanad. Social Sci 34:70–85

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI (2013) Facts and Figures of Agriculture in Kerala. Department of Agriculture, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. http://www.keralaagriculture.gov.in/pdf/fact_figures_25062014.pdf. Accessed 16 Sep 2014

  • Gollan J, Smith H, Bulbert M, Donnelly A, Wilkie L (2010) Using spider web types as a substitute for assessing web-building spider biodiversity and the success of habitat restoration. Biodivers Conserv 19:3141–3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Kerala (2008) Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008

  • Harwood JD, Sunderland KD, Symondson W (2001) Living where the food is: web location by linyphiid spiders in relation to prey availability in winter wheat. J Appl Ecol 38:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan FG, Crisol E (2013) Hybrid rice and insect herbivores in Asia. Entomol Exp Appl 148: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jocqué R, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS (2007) Spider families of the world, 2nd edn. Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale; ARC-PPRI, Tervuren

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven LGE (1981) Pests of crops in Indonesia. P. T. Ichtiar Baru - Van Hoeve, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiritani K, Kawahara S, Sasaba T, Nakasuji F (1972) Quantitative evaluation of predation by spiders on the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler, by a sight-count method. Res Popul Ecol 13:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar NA, Gopi G, Prajeesh P (2010) Genetic erosion and degradation of ecosystem services of wetland rice fields: a case study from Western Ghats, India. In: Lockie S, Carpenter D (eds) Agriculture, biodiversity and markets. Earthscan, London, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF (2010) Habitat destruction: death by a thousand cuts. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 73–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Kim ST, Jung JK, Lee J-H (2014) A comparison of spider communities in Bt and non-Bt rice fields. Environ Entomol 43: 819–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemessa D, Hambäck PA, Hylander K (2015) The effect of local and landscape level land-use composition on predatory arthropods in a tropical agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecol 30:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y-G, Zhang G-R, Zhang W-Q, Hu Y, Zhang J (2013) Biological control of rice insect pests in China. Biol Control 67:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Heong KL (2009) Effects if nigtrogen-enriched rice plants on ecological fitness of planthoppers. In: Heong KL, Hardy B (eds) Planthoppers: new threats to the sustainability of intensive rice production systems in Asia. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, pp 247–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Zhu P, Gurr GM, Zheng X, Chen G, Heong KL (2015) Rice pest management by ecological engineering: a pioneering attemt in China. In: Heong KL, Cheng J, Escalada MM (eds) Rice planthoppers: ecology, management, socio economics and policy. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 163–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney D, Drummond FA, Alford R (2003) Spider predation in aroecosystems: Can spiders effectively control pest populations? Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maine, Orono

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoj EM (2012) Lifeline for Wayanad’s traditional rice varieties. The Hindu, August 27. http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-kerala/article3826145.ece#.UDsRyyGDRx0.email. Accessed 23 May 2015

  • Marc P, Canard A, Ysnel F (1999) Spiders (Araneae) useful for pest limitation and bioindication. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:229–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matson PA (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy F, Murphy JA (2000) An introduction to the spiders of South East Asia. With notes on all the genera. Malaysian Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Benz G (1987) Spiders in natural pest control: a review. J Appl Enthomol 103:321–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Sterling WL, Dean DA (1994a) Insectivorous activities of spiders in United States field crops. J Appl Entomol 118:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyffeler M, Sterling WL, Dean DA (1994b) How spiders make a living. Environ Entomol 23:1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey S, Byerlee D, Dawe D, Dobermann A, Mohanty S, Rozelle S, Hardy B (eds) (2010) Rice in the global economy. Strategic research and policy issues for food security. International Rice Research Institute, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Proszynski J (2003) Salticidae (Aranae) of the World. http://salticidae.org/salticid/diagnost/title-pg.htm. Accessed 18 May 2015

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reissig WH, Heinrichs EA, Litsinger JA, Moody K, Fiedler L, Mew TW, Barrion AT (1986) Illustrated guide to integrated pest management in rice in tropical Asia. International Rice Research Institute, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Bishop L (1990) Prey control by an assemblage of generalist predators: spiders in garden test systems. Ecology 71:1441–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert SE, Lawrence K (1997) Test for predation effects of single versus multiple species of generalist predators: spiders and their insect prey. Entomol Exp Appl 84:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhoshkumar A, Ichikawa K (2010) Homegardens: sustainable land use systems in Wayanad, Kerala, India. In: Bélair C, Ichikawa K, Wong BYL, Mulongoy KJ (eds) Sustainable use of biological diversity in socio-ecological production landscapes. Background to the ‘Satoyama Initiative for the benefit og biodiversity and human well-being’. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, pp 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasidharan N (2011) Flowering plants of Kerala. 2nd edn. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MH, Tscharntke T (2005) Landscape context of sheetweb spider (Araneae: Linyohiidae) abundance in cereal fields. J Biogeogr 32:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MH, Thies C, Nentwig W, Tscharntke T (2008) Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 35:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenly KG, Cohen JE, Heong KL, Litsinger JA, Barrion AT, Arida GS (2010) Fallowing did not disrupt invertebrate fauna in Philippine low-pesticide irrigated rice fields. J Appl Ecol 47:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian PA, Peter KV (eds) (2009) Spiders of India. Universities Press, Hyderabad

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian PA, Mathew MJ, PathummalBeevi S, Joseph J, Biju CR (2005) The spider fauna of irrigated rice ecosystem in central Kerala, India across different elevational ranges. J Arachnol 33:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settle WH, Ariawan H, Astuti ET, Cahyana W, Hakim AL, Hindayana D et al (1996) Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alternative prey. Ecology 77:1975–1988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-depentent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenchly K, Clough Y, Buchori D, Tscharntke T (2011) Spider web guilds in cacao agroforestry—comparing tree, plot and landscape-scale management. Divers Distrib 17:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenchly K, Clough Y, Tscharntke T (2012) Spider species richness in cocoa agroforestry systems, comparing vertical strata, local management and distance to forest. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland K, Samu F (2000) Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: a review. Entomol Exp Appl 95:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir HM, Butt A (2009) Predatory potential of three hunting spiders inhabiting the rice ecosystems. J Pest Sci 82:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahir HM, Butt A, Sherawat SM (2009) Foraging strategies and diet composition of two orb web spiders in rice ecosystems. J Arachnol 37:357–362

  • Takada MB, Yoshioka A, Takagi S, Iwabuchi S, Washitani I (2012) Multiple spatial scale factors affecting mirid bug abundance and damage level in organic rice paddies. Biol Control 60:169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada MB, Kobayashi T, Yoshioka A, Takagi S, Washitani I (2013) Facilitation of ground-dwelling wolf spider predation on mirid bugs by horizontal webs built by Tetragnatha spiders in organic paddy fields. J Arachnol 41:31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Plant List (2013) Version 1.1. http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed 30 Sep 2014

  • Tikader BK (1987) Handbook of Indian spiders. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D’Antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz G, Halaj J, Cady AB (1999) Guild structure of spiders in major crops. J Arachnol 27:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI (2012) mvabund—an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:471–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright S, Eddelbuettel D, Warton D (2016) mvabund: statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. R package version 3.11.9. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=mvabund

  • World Spider Catalog (2014) World Spider Catalog, Version 15.5. http://wsc.nmbe.ch. Accessed 15 Sep 2014

  • Zhao Z, Sandhu HS, Gao F, He D (2015) Shifts in natural enemy assemblages resulting from landscape simplification account for biocontrol loss in wheat fields. Ecol Res 30:493–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerberg B, Desrochers A, Hochachka WM, Fink D, Koenig WD, Dickinson JL (2012) A persistent, but misdirected concern when collecting and analyzing ecological data. J Wildl Manag 76:1072–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the cooperation of 15 farmers of Wayanad: Achappan Palookkappu, Bharathan Kalluvayal, Gopalan Kalluvayal, Gopalan Chempakappatta, Hareendran Cherukkattoor, Jhon Paliyana, Manoj Paliyana, Mathai Paliyana, Radhakrishnan Paliyana, Rajan Paliyana, Raman Palliyara, Sudheesh Karingari, Sunil Karingari, Vijayan Thamarachira and Yamuna Paliyana. We are grateful to Parameshwaran Prajeesh who conducted the plant survey. We would like to thank Sabitha, Mathews, Kamarudheen, and Prashoob for field assistance, Dr. Sunil Jose for assistance with spider identification and Bastian Niemeyer who digitised the land-use maps. We duely acknowledge the support provided by the BioDIVA project and colleagues and the M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation. We thank Stephan Rudolph, Arne Schulze and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This study was conducted whithin the BioDIVA research group, funded by FONA—Social-Ecological Research, BMBF (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Naturgeschichte - Zoologie, Friedensplatz 1, 64283, Darmstadt, Germany

    Lydia Betz

  2. Agroecology, Department of Crop Science, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

    Lydia Betz & Teja Tscharntke

Authors
  1. Lydia Betz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teja Tscharntke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lydia Betz.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Betz, L., Tscharntke, T. Enhancing spider families and spider webs in Indian rice fields for conservation biological control, considering local and landscape management. J Insect Conserv 21, 495–508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9990-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-9990-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation