Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graphene oxide and titanium: synergistic effects on the biomineralization ability of osteoblast cultures

  • Engineering and Nano-engineering Approaches for Medical Devices
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) has attracted remarkable attention in recent years due to properties such as extremely large surface area, biocompatibility, biostability, and easy chemical functionalization. Osteoblasts underlie the deposition of hydroxyapatite crystals in the bone protein matrix during biomineralization; hydroxyapatite deposition involves extracellular matrix vesicles that are rich in alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Here, we have investigated how GO affects osteoblast viability, ALP activity, and mineralized matrix formation in osteoblast cultures in three different phases of cell growth, in the presence and in the absence of titanium (Ti). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman spectra, and energy dispersive spectroscopy aided GO characterization. The presence of GO increased the viability of osteoblast cells grown on a plastic surface. However, osteoblast viability on Ti discs was lower in the presence than in the absence of GO. ALP activity emerged at 14 days for the cell culture incubated with GO. The total protein concentration also increased at 21 days on both the Ti discs and plastic surface. Osteoblasts grown on Ti discs had increased mineralized matrix formation in the presence of GO as compared to the cells grown in the absence of GO. SEM images of the cell cultures on plastic surfaces in the presence of GO suggested delayed mineralized matrix formation. In conclusion, applications requiring the presence of Ti, such as prostheses and implants, should benefit from the use of GO, which may increase mineralized nodule formation, stimulate biomineralization, and accelerate bone regeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S. Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci. 2011;56:1178–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dubey N, Bentini R, Cao T, Neto AHC, Rosa V. Graphene: a versatile carbon-based material for bone tissue engineering. Stem Cells Int. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/804213.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehrali M, Moghaddam E, Shirazi SFS, Baradaran S, Mehrali M, Latibari ST, Metselaar HSC, Kadri NA, Zandi K, Osman NAA. Synthesis, mechanical properties, and in vitro biocompatibility with osteoblasts of calcium silicate-reduced graphene oxide composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:3947–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shih CJ, Lin S, Sharma R, Strano MS, Blankschtein D. Understanding the pH-dependent behavior of graphene oxide aqueous solutions: a comparative experimental and molecular dynamics simulation study. Langmuir. 2012;28:235–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gu M, Liu Y, Chen T, Du F, Zhao X, Xiong C, Zhou Y. Is graphene a promising nano-material for promoting surface modification of implants or scaffold materials in bone tissue engineering? Tissue Eng Part B. 2014;20:477–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen GY, Pang DW, Hwang SM, Tuan HY, Hu YC. A graphene-based platform for induced pluripotent stem cells culture and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2012;33:418–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J, Choi KS, Kim Y, Lim KT, Seonwoo H, Park Y, Kim DH, Choung PH, Cho CS, Kim SY, Choung YH, Chung JH. Bioactive effects of graphene oxide cell culture substratum on structure and function of human adipose-derived stem cells. Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:3520–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Samavedi S, Whittington AR, Goldstein AS. Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: a review of properties and their influence on cell behavior. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:8037–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tatavarty R, Ding H, Lu G, Taylorb RJ, Bi X. Synergistic acceleration in the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by graphene oxide–calcium phosphate nanocomposites. Chem Commun. 2014;50:8484–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akhavan O, Chaderi E. Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano. 2010;4:5731–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang J, Chen Q, Xu LG, Zhang S, Feng LZ, Cheng L, Xu H, Liu Z, Peng R. Graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite as a highly effective antibacterial agent with species-specific mechanisms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:3867–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Rahighi R. Toward single-DNA electrochemical biosensing by graphene nanowalls. ACS Nano. 2012;6:2904–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang LM, Xia JG, Zhao QH, Liu LW, Zhang ZJ. Functional graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed anticancer drugs. Small. 2010;6:537–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng C, Hu W, Zhou Y, Fan C, Huang Q. Intracellular imaging with a graphene-based fluorescent probe. Small. 2010;6:1686–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson JT, Tabakman SM, Liang YY, Wang HL, Casalongue HS, Vinh D, Dai HJ. Ultrasmall reduced graphene oxide with high near-infrared absorbance for photothermal therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:6825–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akhavan O, Choobtashani M, Ghaderi E. Protein degradation and RNA efflux of viruses photocatalyzed by graphene-tungsten oxide composite under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116:9653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liao KH, Lin YS, Macosko CW, Haynes CL. Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibroblasts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2011;3:2607–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou K, Thouas GA, Bernard CC, Nisbet DR, Finkelstein DI, Li D, Forsythe JS. Method to impart electro- and biofunctionality to neural scaffolds using graphene-polyelectrolyte multilayers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4:4524–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Millán JL. The role of phosphatases in the initiation of skeletal mineralization. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93:299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu H, Cheng J, Chen F, Hou F, Bai D, Xi P, Zeng Z. Biomimetic and cell-mediated mineralization of hydroxyapatite by carrageenan functionalized graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:3132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang M, Bai L, Shang W, Xie W, Ma H, Fu Y, Fang D, Sun H, Fan L, Han M, Liub C, Yang S. Facile synthesis of water-soluble, highly fluorescent graphene quantum dots as a robust biological label for stem cells. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:7461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Akhavan A. Size-dependent genotoxicity of graphene nanoplatelets in human stem cells. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8017–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Linares J, Matesanz MC, Vila M, Feito MJ, Gonçalves G, Vallet-Regí M, Marques PA, Portolés MT. Endocytic mechanisms of graphene oxide nanosheets in osteoblasts, hepatocytes and macrophages. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:13697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hummers WS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maniatopoulos C, Sodek J, Melcher AH. Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;254:317–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Simão AMS, Beloti MM, Cezarino RM, Rosa AL, Pizauro JM, Ciancaglini P. Membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase from ectopic mineralization and rat bone marrow cell culture. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2007;146:679–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zancanela DC, et al. Defective multilayer carbon nanotubes increase alkaline phosphatase activity and bone-like nodules in osteoblast cultures. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16:1437–44. doi:10.1166/jnn.2016.10753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simão AM, Yadav MC, Narisawa S, Bolean M, Pizauro JM, Hoylaerts MF, Ciancaglini P, Millán JL. Proteoliposomes harboring alkaline phosphatase and nucleotide pyrophosphatase as matrix vesicle biomimetics. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:7598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartree EF. Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Anal Biochem. 1972;48:422–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cuong TV, Pham VH, Tran QT, Hahn SH, Chung JS, Shin EW, Kim EJ. Photoluminescence and Raman studies of graphene thin films prepared by reduction of graphene oxide. Mater Lett. 2010;64:399–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gurunathan S, Park JH, Han JW, Kim JH. Comparative assessment of the apoptotic potential of silver nanoparticles synthesized by Bacillus tequilensis and Calocybe indica in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells: targeting p53 for anticancer therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:4203–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaniyoor A, Ramaprabhu S. A Raman spectroscopic investigation of graphite oxide derived graphene. AIP Adv. 2012. doi:10.1063/1.4756995.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mao HY, Laurent S, Chen W, Akhavan O, Imani M, Ashkarran AA, Mahmoudi M. Graphene: promises, facts, opportunities, and challenges in nanomedicine. Chem Rev. 2013;113:3407–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mullick Chowdhury S, Lalwani G, Zhang K, Yang JY, Neville K, Sitharaman B. Cell specific cytotoxicity and uptake of graphene nanoribbons. Biomaterials. 2013;34:283–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gurunathan S, Han JW, Kim E, Kwon DN, Park JK, Kim JH. Enhanced green fluorescent protein-mediated synthesis of biocompatible graphene. J Nanobiotechnol. 2014;12:41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferrari AC, Basko DM. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8:235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cançado LG, Jorio A, Ferreira EHM, Stavale F, Achete CA, Capaz RB, Moutinho MVO, Lombardo A, Kulmala TS, Ferrari AC. Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 2011;11:3190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Salzmann CG, Llewellyn SA, Tobias G, Ward MA, Huh Y, Green ML. The role of carboxylated carbonaceous fragments in the functionalization and spectroscopy of a single-walled-nanotube material. Adv Mater. 2007;19:883–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kosynkin DV, Higginbotham AL, Sinitskii A, Lomeda JR, Dimiev A, Price BK, Tour JM. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature. 2009;458:872–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Paratala BS, Jacobson BD, Kanakia S, Francis LD, Sitharaman B. Physicochemical characterization, and relaxometry studies of micro-grafite oxide, graphene nanoplatelets, and nanoribbons. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferrari AC, Meyer JC, Scardaci V, Casiraghi C, Lazzeri M, Mauri F, Piscanec S, Jiang D, Novoselov KS, Roth S, Geim AK. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97:187401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Talukdar Y, Rashkow JT, Lalwani G, Kanakia S, Sitharaman B. The effects of graphene nanostructures on mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4863–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kalbacova M, Broz A, Kong J, Kalbac M. Graphene substrates promote adherence of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells. Carbon. 2010;48:4323–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kalbacova M, Broz A, Kalbac M. Influence of the fetal bovine serum proteins on the growth of human osteoblast cells on graphene. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:3001–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Elkhenany H, Amelse L, Lafont AJ, Bourdo S, Caldwell M, Neilsen N, Dervishi E, Derek O, Biris AS, Anderson D, Dhar M. Graphene supports in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of goat adult mesenchymal stem cells: potential for bone tissue engineering. Appl Toxicol. 2015;35:367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sasidharan A, Panchakarla LS, Chandran P, Menon D, Nair S, Rao CN, Koyakutty M. Differential nano-bio interactions and toxicity effects of pristine versus functionalized graphene. Nanoscale. 2011;3:2461–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Li Y, Yuan H, von dem Bussche A, Creighton M, Hurt RH, Kane AB, Gao H. Graphene microsheets enter cells through spontaneous membrane penetration at edge asperities and corner sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:12295–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhao C, Lu X, Zanden C, Kiu J. The promising application of graphene oxide as coating materials in orthopedic implants: preparation, characterization and cell behavior. Biomed Mater. 2015;10:015019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. La WG, Park S, Yoon HH, Jeong GJ, Lee TJ, Bhang SH, Han JY, Char K, Kim BS. Delivery of a therapeutic protein for bone regeneration from a substrate coated with graphene oxide. Small. 2013;9:4051–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. La WG, Jin M, Park S, Yoon HH, Jeong GJ, Bhang SH, Park H, Char K, Kim BS. Delivery of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and substance P using graphene oxide for bone regeneration. Int J Nanomed. 2014;1:107–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Química, Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-901, Brazil

    Daniela C. Zancanela, Ana Maria S. Simão, Camila G. Francisco, Amanda N. de Faria, Ana Paula Ramos, Rogéria R. Gonçalves, Elaine Y. Matsubara, José Maurício Rosolen & Pietro Ciancaglini

  2. Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14049-900, Brazil

    Amanda N. de Faria

Authors
  1. Daniela C. Zancanela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Maria S. Simão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Camila G. Francisco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amanda N. de Faria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ana Paula Ramos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rogéria R. Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Elaine Y. Matsubara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. José Maurício Rosolen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pietro Ciancaglini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela C. Zancanela.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (TIF 133 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zancanela, D.C., Simão, A.M.S., Francisco, C.G. et al. Graphene oxide and titanium: synergistic effects on the biomineralization ability of osteoblast cultures. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 27, 71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5680-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5680-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation