Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Latent Structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taxometric analyses were used to assess the latent structure of depressive symptoms as measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. Participants were 3,395 college students enrolled in Introductory Psychology classes at a mid-size university. Analyses included data simulation strategies to assure that the data was appropriate for interpreting skewed indicators and small putative taxa. Four indicators (depressed mood, positive affect, somatic, and interpersonal symptoms) were derived from principal components analysis. Taxometric analyses indicated that distributions of the four CES-D factor based indicators were dimensional. Results are consistent with a continuity model of the latent structure of questionnaire measures of depressive symptoms in this young adult population, of which approximately 15% scored above the clinical cut-point for the CES-D scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrosini, P. J., Bennett, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Haslam, N. (2002). Taxonicity of adolescent melancholia: a categorical or dimensional construct? Journal of Psychiatric Research, 36, 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, S. R. H., & Amir, N. (2003). Is depression taxonic, dimensional, or both? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 228–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchaine, T. P. (2003). Taxometrics and developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 501–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, L., Berman, C. S., & Kasi, S. (1986). Depressive symptoms in relation to physical health and functioning in the elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124, 372–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J. (1998). Contributions of psychoanalysis to the understanding and treatment of depression. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, 723–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, R. W., Maljanian, P., & Goethe, J. (2003). Screening for depression in clinical practice: reliability and validity of a five-item subset of the CES-depression. Perceptual and Motor skills, 97(3), 855–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brantley, P. J., Mehan, D. J., & Thomas, J. L. (2000). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings (pp. 391–421). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, W. E., Blazer, D. G., George, L., & Tse, C. K. (1990). Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiological survey. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 2524–2528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. K., Sha, T., & Bagley, C. (1998). Validating an American scale in Hong Kong: The Center for epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 169–186.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fechner-Bates, S., Coyne, J. C., & Schwenk, T. L. (1994). The relationship of self-reported distress to depressive disorders and other psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 550–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flett, G. L., Vrendenburg, K., & Krames, L. (1997). The continuity of depression in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 395–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1995). Symptoms versus a diagnosis of depression: differences in psychosocial functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 90–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, B. L., Fraley, R. C., Lahey, C., Benjamin, B., & Waldman, I. D. (2005). Is depression best viewed as a continuum or discrete category? A taxometric analysis of childhood and adolescent depression in a population-based sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harringsma, R., Engels, G. I., & Beckman, A. T. (2004). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(6), 558–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (1999). Categorical versus dimensional models of mental disorders: new taxometric evidence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 696–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., & Ernst, D. (2002). Essentialist beliefs about mental disorders. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 628–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N., Kim, H., Cleland, C., Steer, R. A., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Testing the threshold model of melancholia. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Hyman, S. E. (2007). Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? Nature Review: Neuroscience, 8, 725–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, L. L., Rapaport, M. H., Pauulus, M., & Brown, J. L. (1994). Subsyndromal symptomatic depression: a new mood disorder? Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 55 (Supplement), 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., & Paulus, M. P. (1997). The role and clinical significance of sub-syndromal depressive symptoms (SSD) in unipolar major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 5–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendell, R., & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kendler, K. S., & Gardner, C. O. (1998). Boundaries of major depression: an evaluation of DSM-IV criteria. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 172–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Zhao, S., Blazer, D. G., & Swartz, M. (1997). Prevalence, correlates, and course of minor depression and major depression in the national comorbidity survey. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 19–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1994). Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports, 74, 1059–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1996). Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports, 78, 1091–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1991). Life stressors, social resources, and the treatment of depression. In J. Becker & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of depression (pp. 187–214). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G., Roussos, J., & Austin, M. P. (1998). Disordered personality style: higher rates in non-melancholic compared to melancholic depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 47, 131–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Journal of Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. E., & Vernon, S. W. (1983). The center for epidemiological studies depression scale: its use in a community sample. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 41–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J. (2004a). Taxometric programs documentation, R language [Computer Manual]. http://www2.etown.edu/psychology/Documents/TaxProgDocR.PDF.

  • Ruscio, J. (2004b). Taxometric programs in R [Computer language]. http://www2.etown.edu/psychology/Documents/TaxProgR.txt

  • Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2000). Informing the continuity controversy: a taxometric analysis of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 473–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2004). A non-techical introduction to the taxometric method. Understanding Statistics, 3, 151–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A. M., & Keane, T. M. (2004). Using taxometric analysis to distinguish a small latent taxon from a latent dimension with positively skewed indicators: the case of involuntary defeat syndrome. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 145–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santor, D. A., & Coyne, J. C. (2001). Evaluating the continuity of symptomatology between depressed and non-depressed individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 216–225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santor, D. A., Zuroff, D. C., Ramsay, J. O., Cervantes, P., & Palacios, J. (1995). Examining scale discriminability in the BDI and CES-D as a function of depressive severity. Psychological Assessment, 7, 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorius, N. (2009). Disability and mental illness are different entities and should be assessed separately. World Psychiatry, 8, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Kotov, R., & Joiner, T. E., Jr. (2004). Taxometrics: Toward a new diagnostic scheme for psychopathology. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, A. B. (2006). Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires: Beck, CES-D, Hamilton, and Zung. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 123–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shean, G., & Baldwin, G. (2008). Sensitivity and specificity of depression questionnaires in a college-age sample. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169, 281–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A., Haaga, D. A., & Arnow, B. A. (2001). Is clinical depression distinct from subthreshold depressive symptoms: a review of the continuity issue in depression research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 498–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winokur, G. (1997). All roads lead to depression: clinically homogenous, etiologically heterogenous. Journal of Affective Disorders, 45, 97–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M., Coryell, W., & Pfohl, B. (1986). Melancholic subtyping: a qualitative or quantitative distinction? American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 98–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Shean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shean, G.D., Baldwin, G. The Latent Structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 34, 502–509 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9296-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9296-3

Keywords

Navigation