Skip to main content
Log in

Pinning and Unpinning in Nonlocal Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate pinning regions and unpinning asymptotics in nonlocal equations. We show that phenomena are related to but different from pinning in discrete and inhomogeneous media. We establish unpinning asymptotics using geometric singular perturbation theory in several examples. We also present numerical evidence for the dependence of unpinning asymptotics on regularity of the nonlocal convolution kernel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this sense, the profiles have countably many discontinuities at locations \(x\in \mathbb {Z}\).

  2. The middle branch is normally hyperbolic except for the fold points, as well, and normally stable, but of less relevance to us, here.

  3. Discretization details: \(dt=0.17\), \(dx=0.007324\), on \(|x|\le 30\); best-fit slopes using 4th to 8th smallest data points.

  4. Discretization details: \(dt=0.17\), \(dx=0.007324\), on \(|x|\le 30\); best-fit slopes using 4th to 8th smallest data points.

  5. Discretization details: We used \(2^{13}\) Fourier modes, \(dt=0.17\), \(|x|\le 30\); best-fit slopes using 4th to 8th smallest data points.

  6. Discretization details: We used \(2^{13}\) Fourier modes, \(dt=0.17\), \(|x|\le 30\); best-fit slopes using 4th to 8th smallest data points.

  7. Discretization details: We used \(2^{13}\) Fourier modes, \(dt=0.17\), \(|x|\le 30\); best-fit slopes using 4th to 8th smallest data points.

References

  1. Bates, P., Fife, P., Ren, X., Wang, X.: Traveling waves in a convolution model for phase transitions. Arch. Ration. Mech.Anal. 138, 105–136 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Broer, H., Kaper, T., Krupa, M.: Geometric desingularization of a cusp singularity in slow-fast systems with applications to Zeeman’s examples. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 25, 925–958 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpio, A., Bonilla, L.: Wave front depinning transition in discrete one-dimensional reaction diffusion systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(26), 6034–6037 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X.: Existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic stability of traveling waves in nonlocal evolution equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2, 125–160 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chmaj, A.: Existence of traveling waves in the fractional bistable equation. Arch. Math. 100, 473–480 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Faye, G., Scheel, A.: Fredholm properties of nonlocal differential operators via spectral flow. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 63, 1311–1348 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Faye, G., Scheel, A.: Existence of pulses in excitable media with nonlocal coupling. Adv. Math. 270, 400–456 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenichel, N.: Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 31, 53–98 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Krupa, M., Szmolyan, P.: Geometric singular perturbation theory to nonhyperbolic points: fold and canard points in two dimensions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 33, 286–314 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishchenko, E., Kolesov, Y., Kolesov, A., Rozov, N.: Asymptotic Methods in Singularly Perturbed Systems. Monogr. Contemp. Math, Consultants Bureau, New York (1994)

  11. Scheel, A., van Vleck, E.: Lattice differential equations embedded into reaction–diffusion systems. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A 139A, 193–207 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Szmolyan, P., Wechselberger, M.: Relaxation oscillations in \(\mathbb{R}^3\). J. Differ. Equ. 200, 69–104 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. van Gils, S., Krupa, M., Szmolyan, P.: Asymptotic expansions using blow-up. ZAMP 56(3), 369–397 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted during Summer 2014 in the REU: Complex Systems at the University of Minnesota Department of Mathematics, funded by the National Science Foundation (DMS-1311414) and (DMS-1311740).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnd Scheel.

Appendix: Passage Through an Inflection Point

Appendix: Passage Through an Inflection Point

In this appendix, we prove some results stated in Sect. 3.2 for the system of differential equations

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}t}w&=-1, \end{aligned}$$
(6.1a)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}t}u&=u^3-w. \end{aligned}$$
(6.1b)

This system was obtained after some scalings in the study of the slow passage through an inflection point.

Proposition 6.1

For the system (6.1), the following results hold.

  1. (i)

    There exists a unique trajectory \(\gamma _0\) in the (u, w)-plane such that \(u(t)^3-w(t)\rightarrow 0\) for \(t\rightarrow \pm \infty \).

  2. (ii)

    The Cauchy Principal Value \(C_0\) of u exists and

    $$\begin{aligned} C_0 := P.V. \int _\mathbb {R}u(t)\mathrm {d}t<0. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

We first start by setting \(w_{1,-}:=w^{-\frac{1}{3}}\) and \(u_{1,-}:=uw^{-\frac{1}{3}}\) for \(w>0\) (respectively \(w_{1,+}\) and \(u_{1,+}\) for \(w<0\)) such that system (6.1) is transformed into two systems

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}t}w_{1,\pm }&=\frac{1}{3}w_{1,\pm }^4, \end{aligned}$$
(6.2a)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}t}u_{1,\pm }&=\frac{u_{1,\pm }^3-1}{w_{1,\pm }^2}+\frac{1}{3}u_{1,\pm }w_{1,\pm }^3. \end{aligned}$$
(6.2b)

Now, rescaling time such that \(w_{1,\pm }^2 \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}t}:=\frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}s}\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}s}w_{1,\pm }&=\frac{1}{3}w_{1,\pm }^6, \end{aligned}$$
(6.3a)
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}s}u_{1,\pm }&=u_{1,\pm }^3-1+\frac{1}{3}u_{1,\pm }w_{1,\pm }^5. \end{aligned}$$
(6.3b)

Note that each system possesses a unique equilibrium given by \((w_{1,\pm },u_{1,\pm })=(0,1)\), corresponding to the “equilibrium” \((w,u)=(\pm \infty ,\pm \infty )\) in system (6.1). The linearization at (0, 1) for each system is given by the Jacobian matrix

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf {J}=\left( \begin{matrix} 0 &{}\quad 0\\ 0 &{}\quad 3 \end{matrix}\right) . \end{aligned}$$

As a consequence, for any \(k\ge 2\), there exists a \(\mathcal {C}^k\) center manifold \(\mathcal {M}_{1,\pm }\), given locally, as a graph of form

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {M}_{1,\pm }=\left\{ \left( \Psi _\pm (w_{1,\pm }),w_{1,\pm }\right) ,~w_{1,\pm } \in \mathcal {V}_\pm \right\} , \end{aligned}$$
(6.4)

where \(\mathcal {V}_\pm \) is a neighborhood of the origin in \(\mathbb {R}^\mp \), and \(\Psi _\pm \) is \(\mathcal {C}^k\), with Taylor expansion

$$\begin{aligned} \Psi _\pm (w_{1,\pm })=1-\frac{1}{9}w_{1,\pm }^5+\mathcal {O}\left( w_{1,\pm }^6\right) , \text { as } w_{1,\pm } \longrightarrow 0. \end{aligned}$$
(6.5)

\(\square \)

We also note that \(u_{1,-}\frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}s}u_{1,-}>0\) provided that \(u_{1,-}\) is large enough and \(w_{1,-}>0\). As a consequence, \(u_{1,-}\) stays bounded as we solve backward in time and using Poincaré-Bendixson Theorem we obtain the following result and its corollary.

Lemma 6.2

Fix \(0<\delta \ll 1\). Any trajectory of system (6.3) with initial condition \((w_{1,-},u_{1,-})=(\delta ,u_{1,-}^0)\), \(u_{1,-}^0\) arbitrary, converges backward in time to (0, 1).

Corollary 6.3

The asymptotics for \(s\longrightarrow -\infty \) are given by the center manifold (6.4) and (6.5), up to exponential corrections.

Finally, we remark that \(u_{1,+} \ge 1\) is locally backward invariant since

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\mathrm {d}}{\mathrm {d}s}u_{1,+}=\frac{1}{3}w_{1,+}^5 < 0, \text { at } w_{1,+}<0, u_{1,+}=1. \end{aligned}$$

And for \(-S \le s \le S\), \(S>0\) fixed, solving backward in time, we have that solutions exist (\(u_{1,\pm }^2\) decreases when large).

As a consequence, we have the existence of a unique trajectory (w, u) for system (6.1) with

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{u^3}{w}\longrightarrow 1 \text { as } t \longrightarrow \pm \infty , \end{aligned}$$

and asymptotics

$$\begin{aligned} u(t)=-t^{\frac{1}{3}}\left( 1+\frac{1}{9}t^{-\frac{5}{3}}+\mathcal {O}\left( t^{-2}\right) \right) , \end{aligned}$$

as \(t \longrightarrow \pm \infty \). This further ensures that the Cauchy principal value \(C_0\) of u(t) exists. One easily checks that \(C_0<0\) and this concludes the proof of the proposition.\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, T., Faye, G., Scheel, A. et al. Pinning and Unpinning in Nonlocal Systems. J Dyn Diff Equat 28, 897–923 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-016-9518-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-016-9518-6

Keywords

Navigation