Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A poverty-inequality trade off?

  • Forum essay
  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The idea that developing countries face a trade off between poverty and inequality has had considerable influence on thinking about development policy. The experience of developing countries in the 1990s does not, however, reveal any sign of a systematic trade off between measures of absolute poverty and relative inequality. Indeed, falling inequality tends to come with falling poverty incidence. And rising inequality appears more likely to be putting a brake on poverty reduction than to be facilitating it. However, there is evidence of a trade off for absolute inequality, suggesting that those who want a lower absolute gap between the rich and the poor must in general be willing to see lower absolute levels of living for poor people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiel, Y. and Cowell, F.: Thinking about Inequality: Personal Judgment and Income Distributions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anand, S. and Kanbur, S.M.R.: The Kuznets process and the inequality-development relationship, J. Development Economics 40 (1993), 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Besley, T. and Burgess, R.: Halving global poverty, J. Economic Perspectives 17(3) (2003), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruno, M., Ravallion, M. and Squire, L.: Equity and growth in developing countries: Old and new perspectives on the policy issues, in V. Tanzi and Ke-young Chu (eds), Income Distribution and High-Quality Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S. and Ravallion, M.: How have the world’s poorest fared since the early 1980s?, World Bank Research Observer 19(2) (2004), 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cowell, F.: Measurement of inequality, in A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds), Handbook of Income Distribution, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Datt, G. and Ravallion, M.: Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s, J. Development Economics 38 (1992), 275–295.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Datt, G. and Ravallion, M.: India’s checkered history in the fight against poverty: Are there lessons for the future?, Economic and Political Weekly 31 (1996), 2479–2486.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fields, G.S.: Distribution and Development, Russell Sage, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Honohan, P.: Inequality and poverty, J. Economic Perspectives 18(2) (2004), 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kakwani, N.: Poverty and economic growth with application to Côte D’Ivoire, Review of Income and Wealth 39 (1993), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kraay, A.: When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries, J. Development Economics, forthcoming.

  13. Kolm, S.: Unequal inequalities I, J. Economic Theory 12 (1976), 416–442.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuznets, S.: Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review 45 (1955), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lipton, M. and Ravallion, M.: Poverty and policy, in J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan (eds), Handbook of Development Economics, Vol. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ravallion, M.: Growth and poverty: Evidence for developing countries in the 1980s, Economics Letters 48 (1995), 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ravallion, M.: Growth, inequality and poverty: Looking beyond averages, World Development 29(11) (2001), 1803–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ravallion, M.: Competing concepts of inequality in the globalization debate, in S. Collins and C. Graham (eds), Brookings Trade Forum 2004: Globalization Poverty and Inequality, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ravallion, M. and Chen, S.: What can new survey data tell us about recent changes in poverty and distribution?, World Bank Economic Review 11(2) (1997), 357–382.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ravallion, M. and Chen, S.: China’s (uneven) progress against poverty, Working Paper 3408, World Bank, 2004 (http://econ.worldbank.org/resource.php?type=5).

  21. Ravallion, M. and Huppi, M.: Measuring changes in poverty: A methodological case study of Indonesia during an adjustment period, World Bank Economic Review 5 (1991), 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Martin Ravallion: These are the views of the author, and need not reflect those of the World Bank or any affiliated organization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravallion, M. A poverty-inequality trade off?. J Econ Inequal 3, 169–181 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-0091-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-0091-1

Keywords

Navigation