Skip to main content
Log in

Perception of and Satisfaction with Relationship Power, Sex, and Attachment Styles: A Couples Level Analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighty heterosexual dating couples provided information about their gender, individual histories of abuse in their current relationship, attachment styles, perception of and satisfaction with relationship power. Partner report of physical abuse was the dependent variable. APIM actor results suggest that an individual's gender interacts with perceived level of relationship power and satisfaction with relationship power for physical abuse. Both dimensions of attachment interacted with perceived relationship power for physical abuse. Partner effects were also found. One's partner's sex interacted with perceived power and satisfaction with relationship power. Finally, the partner's avoidant attachment interacted with satisfaction with relationship power. These findings generally replicate and extend the work of H. M. Ronfeldt, R. Kimerling, and I. Arias (1998, J. Marriage Fam. 60: 70–78) by showing how attachment styles, perception of relationship power, and satisfaction with relationship power are related in predicting aggression against a romantic partner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, I., and Beach, S. R. H. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. J. Fam.Violence 2: 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., Samois, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevelance and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. J. Interpers. Violence 2: 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Waltz, J., Jacobson, N. S., and Gottman, J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 61: 40–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. J. Soc. Pers. Relation. 7: 147–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., and Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61: 226–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J. (1999). Interactional and contextual determinants of attachment security. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver P. R. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, Guilford, New York, NY, pp. 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, C. A., and Chen, H. (1988). Sociological perspectives in family violence. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.), Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum, New York, pp. 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1984). Violence in the family as a disorder of the attachment and caregiving systems. Am. J. Psychoanal. 44: 9–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, A., Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., and O'Leary, K. D. (1998). Dating violence in two high school samples: Discriminating variables. J. Primary Prevention 18: 431–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. E. (1987) Dating violence: A research review and comparison with spouse abuse. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work 68: 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, R. E., and Olson, D. H. (1975). Power in Families, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., and Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 24: 1367–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A. (1995). Adult attachment and emotional control. Pers. Relation. 2: 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Monroe, A., Stuart, G. L., and Hutchinson, G. (1997). Violent vs. nonviolent husbands: Differences in attachment patterns, dependency, and jealousy. J. Fam. Psychol. 11: 314–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T., and Sugarman, D. B. (1986). An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence: The current state of knowledge. Violence Victims 1: 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashy, D. A., and Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In Reis, H. T., and Judd, C. M. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 451–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of nonindependence in dyadic research. J. Soc. Pers. Relation. 6: 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., and Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Pers. Relation. 6: 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, J. E., and McKenry, P. C. (1998). The role of childhood attachment factors in predicting male violence towards female intimates. J. Fam. Violence 13: 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Fam. Relations 30: 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio, A. M., and Gormley, B. (2001). Male perpetration of physical violence against female partners. J. Interpers. Violence 16: 1066–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, M., and Cox, M. (1997). Marital conflict and the development of infant-parent attachment relationships. J. Fam. Psychol. 11: 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, M. C., and Terrant, N. (1993). Attachment styles and aggression in male batterers. Fam. Ther. 11: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., and Stevens, J. G. (1995). Attachment orientations, social support, and conflict resolution in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A., and Rholes, W. S. (eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, Guilford, New York, pp. 166–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, N., and Noller, P. (1998). The association between adult attachment and couples violence: The role of communication patterns and relationship satisfaction. In Simpson, J. A., and Rholes, W. S. (eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, Guilford, New York, pp. 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W. S. (2001). Actor/partner effects and acceptance of aggression in conflicted couples: Attachment styles and spousal abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, A&M University, Texas.

  • Ronfeldt, H. M., Kimerling, R., and Arias, I. (1998). Satisfaction with relationship power and perpetration of dating violence. J. Marriage Fam. 60: 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, L. P., Breen, R., and Howell, M. (1988). Abuse in intimate relationships: A comparison of married and dating college students. J. Interpers. Violence 3: 414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., Collins, N., and Clark, C. L. (1996). Attachment styles and internal working models of self and relationship partners. In Fletcher, G., and Fitness, J. (eds.), Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships, Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., and Rholes, W. S. (1994). Stress and secure base relationships in adulthood. In Bartholomew, K., and Perlman, D. (eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 15, Attachment Process in Adulthood, Jessica Kingsley, Bristol, PA, pp. 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., and Nelligan, J. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62: 434–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., and Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71: 899–914.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B., Hans, S., and Cox, S. (1996). Raising Children in High Risk Environments: Mothers' Experience of Stress and Distress Related to Attachment Security. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Providence, RI.

  • Stets, J. E. (1993). Control in dating relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 52: 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1995). Modeling control in relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 55: 589–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., Alderando, E., and Boney-McCoy, S. (1996). Risk markers of husband-to-wife violence: A continuum of aggression. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 26: 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M., and Bennett, L. W. (1990). A review of quantitative research on men who batter. J. Interpers. Violence 5(1): 87–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., and Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence Victims 13: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Rogers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, W.S., Bidwell, J. & Wilson, L. Perception of and Satisfaction with Relationship Power, Sex, and Attachment Styles: A Couples Level Analysis. J Fam Viol 20, 241–251 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-5988-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-5988-8

Keywords

Navigation