Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Studying the Role of Overconfidence in Problem Gambling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the neural correlates of decision making in gambling tasks may be informative for understanding problem gambling. The present study explored confidence and overconfidence using magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure brain activity during a judgment task. Nineteen undergraduates who self-identified as frequent gamblers (average age 19.7 years; 5 females, 14 males) participated in this study. Participants first completed the DIGS (Winters, Specker & Stinchfield, 2002), a measure of gambling pathology. They then engaged in a behavioral task of confidence assessment, wherein they answered two-alternative trivia questions and estimated the probability that each answer was correct. In a subsequent MEG task, they viewed the questions and a target answer, and indicated with a button press whether the target matched the correct answer. Confidence was directly related to activity in the right prefrontal cortex. Matching and mismatching targets were associated with activity in the medial occipital cortex and left supramarginal gyrus, respectively. An interaction of pathology and match/mismatch was observed in the right inferior occipital-temporal junction region, showing more activity following a mismatch in non-problem gamblers, but not in problem gamblers. Implications of the results for understanding of top–down modulation and attentional systems are discussed in relation to gambling behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baboushkin, H. R., Hardoon, K. K., & Derevensky, J. L. (2001). Underlying cognitions in gambling behavior among university students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1409–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, M., Kalbe, E., Labudda, K., Fujiwara, E., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research, 133, 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Goodie, A. S., & Foster, J. D. (2004). Narcissism, confidence and risk attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, P. L., & Manowitz, P. (1992). Behavioral restraint and symptoms of attention deficit disorder in alcoholics and pathological gamblers. Neuropsychobiology, 25, 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, P. L., Manowitz, P., McBride, H., Nora, R., Swartzburg, M., Goldstein, L. (1987). Attention deficit disorder and pathological gambling. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 487–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D’Annucci, A., & Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 334–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1996): AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockford, D. N., Goodyear, B., Edwards, J., Quickfall, J., & el-Guebaly, N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 787–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. M., & Sereno M. I. (1993). Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 162– 176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., Sundahl, I., & Lesbo, M. (2000). Illusory personal control as a determinant of bet size and type in casino craps games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1224–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta-analyses of switching and stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadou, E., Barth, M., Windischberger, C., Hornik, K., Moser, E. (2004). A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 31, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: Variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over chance outcomes. Psychological Record, 50, 705–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferland, F., Ladouceur, R., & Vitaro, F. (2002). Prevention of problem gambling: Modifying misconceptions and increasing knowledge. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995). Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 33, 636– 647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G.V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining “early” visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristics and biases”. In W. Stroche, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 83–115). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, C. S., Clementz, B. A., & Buckley, P. F. (2005). Stimulus sequence affects schizophrenia-normal differences in event processing during an auditory oddball task. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodie, A. S. (2003). The effects of control on betting: Paradoxical betting on items of high confidence with low value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 598–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodie, A. S. (2005). The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. N. A., Rugg, M. D., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2000). Confidence in recognition memory for words: Dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kweitel, R., & Allen, F. C. L. (1998). Cognitive processes associated with gambling behaviour. Psychological Reports, 82, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (2003) Understanding and treating the pathological gambler. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189, 774–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Walker, M., & Becona, E. (1998). Aproximacion cognitiva para la comprension y tratamiento del juego patologico. [A cognitive approach to the understanding and treatment of pathological gambling]. Psicologia Contemporanea, 5.

  • Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. M., & Ohtsuka, K. (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2005a). Cognitive biases and cognitive therapy. In N. M. Petry, (Ed.) Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment (pp. 209–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2005b). Gamblers Anonymous and cognitive-behavioral therapies for pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson Jr. R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., & Taylor, M. J. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, E., Edwards, J., Smith, G., & Colman, I. (2002). Gambling decision: An early intervention program for problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugle, L., & Melamed, L. (1993). Neuropsychological assessment of attention problems in pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 181, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, P. S., Williams, C. C., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Van Honk, J. (2005). Electrophysiological ratio markers for the balance between reward and punishment. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 685–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the gamblers’ beliefs questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gambling. Substance Use & Misuse, 34, 1593–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T. (2002). Cognitive therapy for problem gambling. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 9, 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Treatment of pathological gambling: A critical review of the literature. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 284–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toneatto, T., & Millar, G. (2004). Assessing and treating problem gambling: Empirical status and promising trends. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 517–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Denburg, N. L. (2002). Asymmetric functional roles of right and left ventromedial prefrontal cortices in social conduct, decision making and emotional processing. Cortex, 38, 589–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. & Kaufman, L. (2003). Magnetic Source Imaging: Search for Inverse Solutions. In Z. Lu, & L. Kaufman (Eds.), (pp. 101–133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Winters, K. C., Specker, S., & Stinchfield, R. S. (2002). Measuring pathological gambling with the Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS) . In J. J. Marotta, J. A. Cornelius, & W. R. Eadington (Eds.), The downside: Problem and pathological gambling. (pp. 143–148). Reno, Nevada: University of Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grants from the National Institute for Mental Health to ASG (MH067827) and BAC (MH57886), and by a Neuroimaging Project Pilot Grant from the University of Georgia Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-3013, USA

    Jazmin Camchong, Adam S. Goodie, Jennifer E. McDowell, Casey S. Gilmore & Brett A. Clementz

Authors
  1. Jazmin Camchong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adam S. Goodie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer E. McDowell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Casey S. Gilmore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brett A. Clementz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam S. Goodie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camchong, J., Goodie, A.S., McDowell, J.E. et al. A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Studying the Role of Overconfidence in Problem Gambling. J Gambl Stud 23, 185–199 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9033-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-006-9033-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation