Skip to main content
Log in

Fragmentation or Transportation: Mode of Large-Prey Retrieval in Arboreal and Ground Nesting Ants

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foraging strategy of ant workers has been studied from several aspects, however, the mode of prey retrieval and factors affecting it have been rarely studied to date, even thought it is an important aspect for understanding ant foraging strategy. We investigated the behavioral response against large prey for 44 ant species of 34 genera belonging to eight subfamilies in Japan, Malaysia and Indonesia. Workers of most arboreal ants cut-up large prey at the site of prey capture, and individual workers retrieve the smaller pieces to the nests. In contrast, in most ground-living species, a group of workers retrieve large prey cooperatively without fragmentation. On the ground, parts of the prey item were often robbed by other ant species during this process, while such interference was rare on trees. The significance of the relation between nest site and mode of prey retrieval is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown WL (1960) Contribution towards a reclassification of the Formicidae. III Tribe Amblyoponini (Hymenoptera). Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv Univ 122:145–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Gebauer G, Fiedler K (2003) Disentagling a reinforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137:426–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brühl CA, Gunsalam G, Linsenmair KE (1998) Stratification of ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a primary rain forest in Sabah, Borneo. J Trop Ecol 14:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging by ants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:231–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1998) Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: breaking the trade-off. Ecol Entomol 23:484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR, Chua TH (2003) Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW, Cook SC, Snelling RR (2004) Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 139:255–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Solano PJ, Ayroles J, Corbara B, Orivel J (2005) Arboreal ants build traps to capture prey. Nature 434:973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1999) Information processing in social insects. Birkhauese-Verlag, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijeto-Lordon C, Richard FJ, Owona C, Gibernau M, Orivel J, Dejean A (2001a) The predatory behavior of the dominant arboreal ant species Tetramorium aculeatum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 38:765–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijeto-Lordon C, Orivel J, Dejean A (2001b) Consuming large prey on the spot by the African ponerine ant Platythyrea modesta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insectes Soc 48:324–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federle W, Rohrseitz KEL, Hölldobler B (2000) Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better ‘was-runner’ have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface. J Exp Biol 203:505–512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, Hölldobler B (2001) Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. PNAS 98:6215–6220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Floren A, Biun A, Linsenmair KE (2002) Arboreal ants as key predators in tropical lowland rainforest trees. Oecologia 131:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB, Anderson C (2001) Division of labour within teams of New World and Old World army ants. Anim. Behav. 62:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland J, Crozier RH, Marc J (1982) On the occurrence of arolia in ant feet. J Aust Entomol Soc 21:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobin B, Peeters C, Billen J (1998) Colony reproduction and arboreal life in the ponerine ant Gnamptgenys menadensis. Neth J Zool 48:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotwald WH Jr (1995) Army ants: the biology of social predation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto Y, Yamane SK, Itioka T (1997) A preliminary study on dietary habits of ants in a Bornean rain forest. Jpn J Entomol 65:688–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirosawa H, Higashi S, Mohamed M (2000) Food habits of Aenictus army ants and their effects on the ant community in a rain forest of Borneo. Insectes Soc 47:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito F, Yamane SK, Eguchi K, Noerdjito WA, Kahono S, Tsuji K, Ohkawara K, Yamauchi K, Nishida T, Nakamura K (2001) Ant species diversity in the Bogor Botanic Garden, West Java, Indonesia, with description of two new species of the genus Leptanilla (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Tropics 10:379–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japanese ant database group (2003) Ants of Japan. Gakken, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz U, Hänel H (1985) The migrating herdsman Dolichoderus (Diabolus) cuspidatus: an ant with a novel mode of life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:171–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuko K (1990) Behavior and ecology of the enigmatic ant Leptanilla japonica Baroni Urbani (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Leptanillinae). Insectes Soc 37:31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuko K (1993) Predation of centipedes by the primitive ant Amblyopone silvestrii. Bull Assoc Nat Sci Senshu Univ 24:35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngnegueu PR, Dejean A (1994) Feeding behavior and worker polymorphism in the carpenter ant Atopomyrmex mocquerysi Andre. In: Lenoir A, Arnold G, Lepage M (eds) Les Insectes Sociaux. Universite Paris Nord, Paris, p 481

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard FJ, Fabre A, Dejean A (2001) Predatory behavior in dominant arboreal ant species: the case of Crematogaster sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 14:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto N, Yamane SK (1997) Food habits of a Japanese carpenter ant, Camponotus (Myrmamblys) nawai Ito (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Jpn J Entomol 65:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen R, Vepsalainen K (1988) A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51:135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RW (1978) Nothomyrmecia macrops: a living-fossil ant rediscovered. Science 201:979–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin JE (1994) Ants as primary consumers: diet and abundance in the Formicidae. In: Hunt PS, Nelpa CA (eds) Nourishment and evolution in insect societies. Westview, Boulder, pp 279–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin JE (1995) Ecology and diversity of tropical forest canopy ants. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest canopies. Academic, London, pp 129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello JFA (1989) Foraging strategies of ants. Annu Rev Entomol 34:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widodo SE, Mohamed M, Hashimoto Y (2001) Canopy ant diversity assessment in the fragmented rainforest of Sabah, East Malaysia. Nature and Human activity 6:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtusiak J, Godzinska EJ, Dejean A (1995) Capture and retrieval of very large prey by workers of the African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille 1802). Trop Zool 8:309–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Eva Kaufmann and Johan Billen for comments that greatly improved this manuscript, two anonymous reviewers for constructive criticisms, Bruno Gobin for comments on an earlier draft, Hirofumi Sumitomo and Takayoshi Doi for their help during field observation in Japan, and Rosli Hashim for his kind help and arrangement of accommodation in Malaysia. Research in Indonesia was permitted by LIPI. This work was partly supported by the grants in aid for scientific research from JSPS [Nos.116911308(A) and 14405036(B)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuminori Ito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, A., Ishihara, S. & Ito, F. Fragmentation or Transportation: Mode of Large-Prey Retrieval in Arboreal and Ground Nesting Ants. J Insect Behav 22, 1–11 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008-9126-3

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008-9126-3

Keywords

Navigation