Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automatic Quantification of Spinal Curvature in Scoliotic Radiograph using Image Processing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choosing the most suitable treatment for the scoliosis relies heavily on accurate and reproducible spinal curvature measurement from radiographs. Our objective is to reduce the variability in spinal curvature measurement by reducing the user intervention and bias. In order to determine the reliability of the spinal curvature measurement as it is in the clinical measurement of scoliosis a methodological survey has been carried out that concludes with inter and intra observer error variation. The proposed method list out horizontal inclination of all the vertebrae’s in terms of slopes using active contour models and morphological operators. This facilitates the radiologist to decide end vertebrae and hence inter/intra observer variation is completely eliminated. Tables 1 and 2 shows the observer error variation between manual and proposed methods in terms of mean and standard deviation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cobb, J., Outline for the study of scoliosis. Ar. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Instr. Course Lect. 5:261–175, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nash, C., and Moe, J., A study of vertebral rotation. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 51:223–229, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeffries, B. F., et al., Computerized measurement and analysis of scoliosis. Pediatr. Radiol. 134:381–385, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur, A., et al., A clinical study of the differences between the scoliotic angles measured on poster anterior and antero posterior radiographs. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 64(A):489–493, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pruijis, J. E. H., et al., Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skelet. Radiol. 23:517–520, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diab, K. M., et al., Accuracy and applicability of measurement of the scoliotic angle at the frontal plane by Cobb’s method, by Ferguson’s method and by a new method. Eur. Spine J. 4:291–295, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung, J., et al., The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital image of the scoliotic spine. Eur. Spine 11:535–542, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linial, A. V., and Aktinson, R. W., Methods and apparatus for detection and measurement of scoliosis of the spine, USPatent-US2006/0015042 A1, 2006.

  9. Perona, P., and Malik, J., Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12(7), 1990.

  10. Kass, M., et al., Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 9:321–331, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, C., and Prince, J. L., Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7(3):359–369, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Vrtovec, T., et al., A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur. Spine. J., 2009.

  13. Lin, Z., Davis, L. S., Doermann, D., and DeMenthon, D., Hierarchical part-template matching for human detection and segmentation. 978-1-4244-1631-8/07/25.00, IEEE, 2007.

  14. Allen, S., Parent, E., Khorasani, M., Hill, D. L., Lou, E., and Raso, J. V., Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of Cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J. Digit. Imaging 21(2):208–218, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gstoettner, M., Sekyra, K., Walochnik, N., Winter, P., Wachter, R., and Bach, C. M., Inter and intra-observer reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur. Spine J. 16:1587–1592, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Modi, H. N., Chen, T., Suh, S. W., Mehta, S., Srinivasalu, S., Yang, J.-H., and Song, H.-R., Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb’s angle. Eur. Spine J. 18:52–58, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Segev, E., Hemo, Y., Wientroub, S., Ovadia, D., Fishkin, M., Steinberg, D. M., and Hayek, S., Intra and interob server reliability analysis of digital radiographic measurements for pediatric orthopedic parameters using a novel PACS integrated computer software program. J. Child Orthop. 4:331–341, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanure, M. C., Pinheiro, A. P., and Oliveira, A. S., Technical report reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital. Spine J. 10:769–774, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Capasso, G., et al., The validity and reliability of measurement of spinal deformity. Acta orthopedia Belgica 58(2):126–135, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ian, A. F., et al., Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm. SPINE 27(24):2801–2805.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal University, Manipal, 576 104, India

    Anitha H

  2. Department of Bio-Medical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal University, Manipal, 576 104, India

    G. K. Prabhu

Authors
  1. Anitha H
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. K. Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anitha H.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

H, A., Prabhu, G.K. Automatic Quantification of Spinal Curvature in Scoliotic Radiograph using Image Processing. J Med Syst 36, 1943–1951 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9654-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9654-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation