Skip to main content
Log in

Data Mining Techniques for Assisting the Diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer Development in Surgical Patients

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pressure ulcer is a serious problem during patient care processes. The high risk factors in the development of pressure ulcer remain unclear during long surgery. Moreover, past preventive policies are hard to implement in a busy operation room. The objective of this study is to use data mining techniques to construct the prediction model for pressure ulcers. Four data mining techniques, namely, Mahalanobis Taguchi System (MTS), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), decision tree (DT), and logistic regression (LR), are used to select the important attributes from the data to predict the incidence of pressure ulcers. Measurements of sensitivity, specificity, F1, and g-means were used to compare the performance of four classifiers on the pressure ulcer data set. The results show that data mining techniques obtain good results in predicting the incidence of pressure ulcer. We can conclude that data mining techniques can help identify the important factors and provide a feasible model to predict pressure ulcer development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schoonhoven, L., Defloor, T., and Grypdonck, M. H. F., Incidence of pressure ulcers due to surgery. J. Clin. Nurs. 11(4):479–487, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunningberg, L., Dahm, M. F., and Ehrenberg, A., Accuracy in the recording of pressure ulcers and prevention after implementing an electronic health record in hospital care. Qual. Saf. Health Care 17(4):281–285, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ken, B., and Sharon, A. A., Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers: A Comparison of Costs in Medical vs. Surgical Patients. Nurs. Econ. 17:263–271, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willson, D., Ashton, C., Wingate, N., et al., “Computerized support of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment protocols,” in Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, 1995, pp. 646–650.

  5. Zielstorff, R. D., Estey, G., Vickery, A., et al., “Evaluation of a decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention and management: preliminary findings,” in Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp, 1997, pp. 248–252.

  6. Tae, Y. K., and Norma, L., “Predictive Modeling for the Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers,” in Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp, pp. 434–438, 2006.

  7. Gunningberg, L., Lindholm, C., Carlsson, M., et al., Reduced incidence of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fractures: a 2-year follow-up of quality indicators. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 13(5):399–407, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunningberg, L., and Stotts, N. A., Tracking quality over time: what do pressure ulcer data show? Int. J. Qual. Health Care 24:246–253, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Laat, E. H., Schoonhoven, L., Pickkers, P., et al., Implementation of a new policy results in a decrease of pressure ulcer frequency. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 18:107–112, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ortiz, M. S., “Clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk in a medical surgical unit,” Master, University of Texas, Arlington, 1992

  11. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. “Pressure Ulcer Category,” September 1, 2010; http://www.npuap.org/resources.htm.

  12. Kwong, E., Pang, S., Wong, T., et al., Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Appl. Nurs. Res. 18(2):122–128, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergstrom, N., Patients at risk for pressure ulcers and evidence-based care for pressure ulcer prevention. Springer Verlang, Berlin, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braden, B., and Bergstrom, N., A conceptual schema for the study of the etiology of pressure sores. Rehabil. Nurs. 12(1):8–12, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schoonhoven, L., Grobbee, D. E., Donders, A. R. T., et al., Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment. Qual. Saf. Health Care 15:65–70, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waterlow, J., Pressure sores: a risk assessment card. Nurs. Time 81(48):49–55, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Defloor, T., The risk of pressure sores: a conceptual scheme. J. Clin. Nurs. 8:206–216, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bergstrom, N., Braden, B., Laguzza, A., et al., The braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs. Res. 36(4):205–210, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoonhoven, L., Defloor, T., van der Tweel, I., et al., Risk indicators for pressure ulcers during surgery. Appl. Nurs. Res. 15(3):163–173, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdolmaleki, P., Buadu, L. D., and Naderimansh, H., Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network. Cancer Lett. 171(2):183–191, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Taguchi, G., The Mahalanobis-Taguchi System. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mahalanobis, P. C., “On the generalised distance in statistics,” in Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, pp. 49–55, 1936.

  23. Taguchi, G., and Juglum, R., The Mahalanobis-Taguchi Strategy. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Vapnik, V., The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., et al., Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46(1):389–422, 2002.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Quinlan, J. R., Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., and Kumar, V., Introduction to Data Mining: Addison Wesley, 2005.

  28. Kubat, M., and Matwin, S., “Addressing the Curse of Imbalanced Training Set: One-Sided Selection,” in Proceedings of Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 179–186, 1997.

  29. Wu, G., and Chang, E. Y., KBA: Kernel Boundary Alignment considering imbalanced data distribution. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(6):786–794, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Su, C.-T., and Hsiao, Y.-H., An Evaluation of the Robustness of MTS for Imbalanced Data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 19(10):1321–1332, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., et al., The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. 11(1):10–18, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported in part by the National Science Council, Taiwan, under grant NSC-98-2221-E-007-071-MY3

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao-Ton Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, CT., Wang, PC., Chen, YC. et al. Data Mining Techniques for Assisting the Diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer Development in Surgical Patients. J Med Syst 36, 2387–2399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9706-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-011-9706-1

Keywords

Navigation