Abstract
Objectives
Prior research demonstrates that crime is highly concentrated at place and that these concentrations are stable from year to year, highlighting the importance of place to crime control and prevention. A potential limitation is that most studies only use one data source to diagnose these patterns. The present study uses data from both police and emergency medical services (EMS) to explore the spatial concentration and stability of drug activity in Seattle, Washington from 2009 to 2014.
Methods
We use concentration graphs and group-based trajectory analysis to examine concentration and stability of calls related to drug activity in both data sources separately and combined. Additionally, we employ Andresen’s S-Index to determine the similarity of concentration within the SPD data, the EMS data and the combined data year to year as well as the degree of co-location between the SPD and EMS data during the study period.
Results
We find a high degree of concentration and group-based stability for both SPD and EMS drug calls across all street segments in Seattle. Conversely, we find only moderate local geographic stability of drug use across street segments as indicated by each of the data sources over the study period. Last, we find the spatial patterns in drug use as indicated by each data source are significantly different each year.
Conclusions
At the same time these findings provide support for the law of crime concentration, they also raise questions about local stability patterns. Additionally, they highlight the importance of expanding inquiries of crime and place research into new data sources. Our results serve to reinforce the importance of multiple data sets in quantifying, understanding, and responding to the drug problem in Seattle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The SPD data contained several classifications for narcotics calls. These included narcotics violations (sale and use), narcotics that were found/recovered, narcotics reports, narcotics connected to drug traffic/loitering, and a general classification for narcotics other. These different call types were recoded into a field for narcotics-related calls.
To increase model stability, we removed all street segments from the dataset that had 0 events for all five years. Thus our largest trajectory group in each data series was not estimated by Stata, but simply reflects those streets with zero drug activity.
All buffers were created using ArcGIS 10.2. Because the buffers include intersections and much of the police data have incidents reported at intersections, we also created round, 7 m buffers around the intersection points and then used the Feature Envelop to Polygon Tool to generate square buffers around the intersections. An envelope polygon provides coverage for the maximum coordinates of an area. Thus, the end result was square buffers that were 7 m from the intersection point to each side (intersections only). We then clipped the street buffers using the intersection envelope areas to obtain a file that contained buffers of just the streets (streets only). Finally, the streets buffers were merged to the enveloped intersection buffers to generate a file of street and intersection buffers combined (streets and intersections).
The 95 % replacement parameter was chosen based on our geocoding accuracy with the SPD data. For all five years, the geocoding rates of the SPD drug data were 96 % or better.
We chose to run the analysis for streets alone, intersections alone, and streets and intersections together given the evidence that events may operate uniquely within the different areas (see Weisburd et al. 2014).
We use the term “trajectory group” throughout this section, while recognizing that some of the groups we have identified are quite small. We also recognize that our low-rate groups reflect very limited variability over time in part, because most of these streets experience no more than 1 call annually.
References
Aitken C, Moore D, Higgs C, Kelsall J, Kerger M (2002) The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: evidence from the street. Int J Drug Policy 13:193–202
Andresen MA (2009) Testing for similarity in area-based spatial patterns: a nonparametric Monte Carlo approach. Appl Geogr 29:333–345
Andresen MA (2016) An area-based nonparametric spatial point pattern test: the test, its applications, and the future. Method Innov 9:1–11
Andresen MA, Linning SJ (2012) The (in)appropriateness of aggregating across crime types. Appl Geogr 35:275–282
Andresen MA, Malleson N (2011) Testing the stability of crime patterns: implications for theory and policy. J Res Crime Delinq 48:58–82
Andresen MA, Malleson N (2013) Crime seasonality and its variations across space. Appl Geogr 43:25–35
Andresen MA, Linning SJ, Malleson N (in press) Crime at places and spatial concentrations: exploring the spatial stability of property crime in Vancouver, BC 2003–2013. J Quant Criminol
Ariel B, Weinborn C, Boyle A (2015) Can routinely collected ambulance data about assaults contribute to reduction in community violence? Emerg Med J 32:308–313
Banta-Green C, Jackson TR, Freng S, Hanrahan M, Graff C, Ohta J, Taylor M, Harruff R, Smith R, Finegood B, Sylla L, Williams J (2015) Drug abuse trends in the Seattle-King County area: 2014. University of Washington Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, Seattle
Beckett K, Nyrop K, Pfingst L (2006) Race, drugs, and policing: understanding disparities in drug delivery arrests. Criminology 44:105–137
Beletsky L, Cochrane J, Sawyer AL, Serio-Chapman C, Smelyanskaya M, Han J, Robinowitz N, Sherman SG (2015) Police encounters among needle exchange clients in Baltimore: drug law enforcement as a structural determinant of health. Am J Pub Health 105:1872–1879
Bottoms T (2014) Geography of crime. In: Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (eds) Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Springer, New York, pp 1943–1955
Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau DM (2010) The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. J Quant Criminol 26:33–53
Braga AA, Hureau DM, Papachristos AV (2011) The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: a longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. J Res Crime Delinq 48:7–32
Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (2014a) History of geographic criminology part II: twentieth century. In: Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (eds) Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Springer, New York, pp 2164–2172
Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (2014b) History of geographic criminology part I: nineteenth century. In: Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (eds) Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Springer, New York, pp 2159–2163
Chaney RA, Rojas-Guyler L (2015) Spatial patterns of adolescent drug use. App Geog 56:71–82
Collins SE, Lonczak HS, Clifasefi SL (2015) LEAD program evaluation: recidivism report. Harm Reduction Research and Treatment Lab, University of Washington-Harborview Medical Center, Seattle
Cooper HL (2015) War on drugs policing and police brutality. Substance use and Misuse, pp 1–7
Curman AS, Andresen MA, Brantingham PJ (2014) Crime and place: a longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. J Quant Criminol 31:127–147
Dovey K, Fitzgerald J, Choi Y (2001) Safety becomes danger: dilemmas of drug-use in public space. Health Place 7:319–331
Forsyth AJM, Hammersley RH, Lavelle TL, Murray KJ (1992) Geographical aspects of scoring illegal drugs. Brit J Criminol 32:292–309
Freisthler B, Lascala EA, Gruenewald PJ, Treno AJ (2005) An examination of drug activity: effects of neighborhood social organization on the development of drug distribution systems. Substance Use Misuse 40:671–686
Green L (1995) Cleaning up drug hot spots in Oakland, California: the displacement and diffusion effects. Just Quart 12:737–754
Groff ER, Weisburd D, Yang S-M (2010) Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “Micro” Level? A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. J Quant Criminol 26:7–32
Gruenewald PJ, Ponicki WR, Remer LG, Waller LA, Zhu L, Gorman DM (2012) Mapping the spread of methamphetamine abuse in California from 1995 to 2008. Am J Pub Health 103:1262–1270
Hibdon J, Groff E (2014) What you find depends on where you look: using emergency medical services call data to target illicit drug use hot spots. J Contemp Crim Just 30:169–185
Jones BL, Nagin DS (2013) A note on a Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Soc Methods Res 42:608–613
Kerr T, Small W, Wood E (2005) The public health and social impacts of drug market enforcement: a review of the evidence. Int J Drug Policy 16:210–220
Latkin C, Glass GE, Duncan T (1998) Using geographic information systems to assess spatial patterns of drug use, selection bias and attrition among a sample of injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 50:167–175
Lum C (2008) The geography of drug activity and violence: analyzing spatial relationships of non-homogenous crime event types. Subst Use Misuse 42:179–201
Mair C, Freisthler B, Ponicki W, Gaidus A (2015) The impacts of marijuana dispensary density and neighborhood ecology on marijuana abuse and dependence. Drug Alch Depend 154:111–116
McCord ES, Ratcliffe JH (2007) A micro-spatial analysis of the demographic and criminogenic environment of drug markets in Philadelphia. Aust New Zeal J Criminol 40:43–63
Miletich S (2014) Report cites plunge in SPD enforcement of low-level crime. Seattle Times (May 15)
Nagin DS (1999) Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psych Methods 4:139–157
Nagin DS (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Nagin DS, Odgers CL (2010) Group-based trajectory modeling (nearly) two decades later. J Quant Criminol 26:445–453
Oberwittler D, Wikström POH (2009) Why small is better: advancing the study of the role of behavioral contexts in crime causation. In: Weisburd D, Bernasco W, Bruinsma GJN (eds) Putting crime in its place: units of analysis in geographic criminology. Springer, New York, pp 35–60
Pollini RA, Brouwer KC, Lozada RM, Ramos R, Cruz MF, Magis-Rodriguez C, Case P, Burris S, Pu M, Frost SDW, Palinkas LA, Miller C, Strathdee SA (2008) Syringe possession arrests are associated with receptive syringe sharing in two Mexico–US border cities. Addiction 103:101–108
Ratcliffe JH (2015) Harm-focused policing. Ideas in American Policing. Police Foundation Washington, DC
Rengert G (1996) The geography of illegal drugs. Westview Press, Boulder
Rodriguez N, Katz C, Webb VJ, Schaefer DR (2005) Examining the impact of individual, community, and market factors on methamphetamine use: a tale of two cities. J Drug Issues 35:665–693
Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME (1989) Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–56
Steenbeek W, Weisburd D (in press) Where the action is in crime? An examination of variability of crime across different spatial units in The Hague, 2001–2009. J Quant Criminol
Sussman S, Stacy AW, Ames SL, Freedman LB (1998) Self-reported high-risk locations of adolescent drug use. Addict Behav 23:405–411
Telep CW, Hibdon J (2016) An evaluation of Seattle’s drug market initiatives. Seattle Neighborhood Group, Seattle
Tompson L, Johnson S, Ashby M, Perkins C, Edwards P (2015) UK open source crime data: accuracy and possibilities for research. Cartog Geograp Inform Sci 42:97–111
Weisburd D (2015) The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology 53:133–157
Weisburd D, Green L (1995) Policing drug hot spots: the Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Just Quart 12:71–735
Weisburd D, Mazerolle L (2000) Crime and disorder in drug hot spots: implications for theory and practice in policing. Police Quart 3:331–349
Weisburd D, Bushway SD, Lum C, Yang SM (2004) Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–322
Weisburd D, Wyckoff LA, Ready J, Eck JE, Hinkle JC, Gajewski F (2006) Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology 44:549–592
Weisburd D, Morris NA, Groff ER (2009) Hot spots of juvenile crime: a longitudinal study of arrest incidents at street segments in Seattle, Washington. J Quant Criminol 25:443–467
Weisburd D, Groff ER, Yang SM (2012) The criminology of place: street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford University Press, New York
Weisburd D, Telep CW, Lawton BA (2014) Could innovations in policing have contributed to the New York City crime drop even in a period of declining police strength? The case of stop, question and frisk as a hot spots policing strategy. Just Quart 31:129–153
Werb D, Kerr T, Fast D, Qi J, Montaner JSG, Wood E (2010) Drug-related risks among street youth in two neighborhoods in a Canadian setting. Health Place 16:1061–1067
Werb D, Rowell G, Guyatt G, Kerr T, Montaner J, Wood E (2011) Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: a systematic review. Inter J Drug Policy 22:87–94
Wheeler AP, Robert RE, McLean SJ (in press) Replicating group-based trajectory models of crime at micro-places in Albany, NY. J Quant Criminol
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hibdon, J., Telep, C.W. & Groff, E.R. The Concentration and Stability of Drug Activity in Seattle, Washington Using Police and Emergency Medical Services Data. J Quant Criminol 33, 497–517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9302-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9302-0