Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Data Mining and Data Visualization Approach to Examine the Interrelationships Between Life Satisfaction, Secularization and Religiosity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Religion and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested a positive relationship between secularization and happiness, as well as a geographical, cultural and development pattern, primarily based on data gathered in Europe and the USA. To gain a more holistic view on the interrelationships between secularization, religiosity and subjective perception of well-being, this study utilized the Wave 6 archival data set (2010–2014) of World Values Survey, which contains 74,042 observations from 60 countries. In this study, the rating of satisfaction with life was treated as the dependent variable. Four secular value indices and 12 variables related to religiosity were extracted from the data set for predictive analysis. Data mining tools, such as the partition tree and bootstrap forest approaches, suggested that only secular values were influential. Specifically, secular values had a negative relationship with satisfaction. In addition, hierarchical clustering based on secularization and satisfaction did not suggest a meaningful pattern. For example, the dendrogram showed that South Korea, Lebanon, Estonia and Algeria were grouped together. This implies that secularization and satisfaction could vary from country to country, regardless of their geographical location, culture and development status. Specifically, countries that are similar in terms of satisfaction and secularization are not necessarily culturally similar or geographically clustered. This discourages the idea that these factors (e.g., location, development status, culture) play a role in mediating the relationship between secularization and religiosity. By directly contradicting previous work showing a pattern based on Europe and the USA, this finding challenges the existing understanding of the relationship between these factors. By expanding the scope of study to the whole world, the current analysis suggested that the existing view regarding the positive relationship between secularization and well-being might be oversimplified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bénézech, M. (2011). Pathological happiness: On pleasant or joyous hallucinatory states and delusions. Annales Médico Psychologiques, 169, 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (2014). The many altars of modernity: Toward a paradigm for religion in a pluralist age. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini, A. N. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9167-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowland, S., Edmond, T., & Fallot, R. D. (2012). Evaluation of a spiritually focused intervention with older trauma survivors. Social Work, 57(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swr001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. (2004). Consistency for a simple model of random forests (Technical report 670), UC Berkeley. https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~breiman/RandomForests/consistencyRFA.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth International Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: Secularization in the West. New York, NY: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. (2015). Faith versus fact: Why science and religion are incompatible. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1840/2002). Democracy in America. Chicano, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • de Waal, F. (2014). The bonobo and the atheist. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, M. (2013). How the West really lost God: A new theory of secularization. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fadaia, B. (2013). Random forest on grouped data. Cross validation. https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/19803/random-forest-on-grouped-data. Accessed 25 Sept 2018.

  • Falk, C. F., & Cai, L. (2016). Maximum marginal likelihood estimation of a monotonic polynomial generalized partial credit model with applications to multiple group analysis. Psychometrika, 81, 434–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9428-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L., & Stubbs, M. (1987). Measuring attitudes towards Christianity: From childhood into adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 741–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (1999). Ecological inference and the ecological fallacy (Technical report 549), UC Berkeley. http://statistics.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/tech-reports/549.pdf. Accessed 27 Sept 2018.

  • Galen, L. (2015). Atheism, wellbeing, and the wager: Why not believing in God (with others) is good for you. Science, Religion and Culture, 2(3), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, Inc. (2014). Gallup global wellbeing. https://news.gallup.com/poll/126965/gallup-global-wellbeing.aspx. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Goldberg, D. (1992). General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., & Elliott, M. (2010). Religion, health, and psychological well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 49, 149–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grzegorzewski, P. (2012). Statistical tests for comparing Pareto charts. Communications in Numerical Analysis, 2012, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5899/2012/cna-00110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, R. D., Krause, N., Ironson, G., Hill, P. C., & Emmons, R. (2016). Health and well-being among the non-religious: Atheists, agnostics, and no preference compared with religious group members. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1024–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. C., & Pargament, K. I. (2008). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, S(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/1941-1022.S.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistler, D., Thöni, C., & Welzel, C. (2017). Survey response and observed behavior: Emancipative and secular values predict prosocial behaviors. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 461–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimberg, R., & McCullough, B. D. (2013). Fundamentals of predictive analytics with JMP. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., & Parkerson, G. (1997). Religion index for psychiatric research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 885–886.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. M. W., & Bond, M. H. (2010). Does individual secularism promote life satisfaction? The moderating role of societal development. Social Indicators Research, 99, 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincare, M. (2015). The sin of false precision: Too many rating-scale categories. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 28(2), 1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (2012). Religiosity: Investigating its affect on self-esteem, perceived stress, and general health in undergraduate students (Bachelor’s Thesis, Dublin Business School, Ireland). https://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/433. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.

  • New Economic Foundation. (2015). Happy Planet Index. http://www.happyplanetindex.org/.

  • Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2012). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G. (2014a). The health of nations. Skeptic, 19(3), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, S. (2014b). The science of religion. http://www.gspaulscienceofreligion.com/. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Pollack, D. (2008). Religious change in Europe: Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. Social Compass, 55(2), 168–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenburg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in science and practice. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, C., Mayer, B., Friedlmeier, M., Lubiewska, K., & Trommsdorff, G. (2011). Religiosity, family orientation, and life satisfaction of adolescents in four countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1375–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. (2016). JMP 13 [Computer Software]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnewe, E., Kortt, M. A., & Dollery, B. (2015). Religion and life satisfaction: Evidence from Germany. Social Indicators Research, 123, 837–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0763-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speybroeck, N. (2012). Classification and regression trees. International Journal of Public Health, 57, 243–246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Society of Religion, 60, 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2015). Human Development Index. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Vanitha, A., & Niraimathi, S. (2013). Study on decision tree: Competent data classification. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 2, 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, C., & Delhey, J. (2015). Generalizing trust: The benign force of emancipation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 875–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1969). Religion in secular society. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1976a). Contemporary transformations of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1976b). Aspects of secularization in the West. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 3, 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1982). Religion in sociological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1994). If religion declines, will the social order survive? Onze Alma Mater, 48, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Survey Association. (2014). World values survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp. Accessed 15 Dec 2016.

  • Yu, C. H. (2010). Exploratory data analysis in the context of data mining and resampling. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. H., Reimer, D., Lee, A., Snijder, J., & Lee, H. S. (2017). A triangulated and exploratory study of the relationships between secularization, religiosity, and social wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 131, 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1290-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without God. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2012). Faith no more: Why people reject religion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2014). Living the secular life: New answers to old questions. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, P. (2015). Living the secular life: New answers to old questions. Lecture delivered at Skeptics Society, Pasadena, CA.

  • Zullig, K. J., Ward, R. M., & Horn, T. (2006). The association between perceived spirituality, religiosity, and life satisfaction: The mediating role of self-rated health. Social Indicators Research, 79, 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-4127-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA

    Chong Ho Yu

  2. Department of Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford, England

    Hailey Trier

  3. Program of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Mary’s University, Halifax, Canada

    Maryann Slama

Authors
  1. Chong Ho Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hailey Trier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maryann Slama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Ho Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive any funding for this project, and thus, we declare that we have no conflict of interest with any party.

Ethical Approval

This article is based on archival data and does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, C.H., Trier, H. & Slama, M. A Data Mining and Data Visualization Approach to Examine the Interrelationships Between Life Satisfaction, Secularization and Religiosity. J Relig Health 58, 271–288 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0737-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0737-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation