Skip to main content
Log in

Two-agent single-machine scheduling with release dates and preemption to minimize the maximum lateness

  • Published:
Journal of Scheduling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider two-agent scheduling on a single machine with release dates and preemption to minimize the maximum lateness. In this scheduling model, there are two agents \(A\hbox { and }B\) each having his own job set \(\mathcal{J}_A= \{ J^a_1, \ldots , J^a_{n_a}\}\hbox { and }\mathcal{J}_B= \{ J^b_1, \ldots , J^b_{n_b}\}\), respectively. Each job \(J_j\in \mathcal{J}_A\cup \mathcal{J}_B\) has a release date \(r_j\) and the \(n=n_a+n_b\) jobs need to be preemptively scheduled on a single machine. Leung et al. (Oper Res 58:458–469, 2010) present a comprehensive study of two-agent scheduling in various machine environments. They show that problem \(1|r_j,\; \text{ pmtn }| L^a_{\max }: f^b_{\max }\le Q\) can be solved in \(O(n_a\log n_a+ n_b\log n_b)\) time. They use the strategy that schedules the jobs of agent \(B\) without preemption as late as possible under the restriction \(f^b_{\max }\le Q\). We show that the strategy fails to work even when \(n_a=n_b=1\), invalidating their result. We then study the minimization problem \(1|r_j,\; \text{ pmtn }| L^a_{\max }: f^b_{\max }\le Q\) and the Pareto optimization problem \(1|r_j,\; \text{ pmtn }| (L^a_{\max }: L^b_{\max })\). We show that the two problems can be solved in \(O(n_an \log n)\hbox { and }O(n_an_bn \log n)\) time, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agnetis, A., Mirchandani, P. B., Pacciarelli, D., & Pacifici, A. (2004). Scheduling problems with two competing agents. Operations Research, 52, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. R., Lawler, E. L., Lenstra, J. K., & Rinnooy Kan, A. H. G. (1983). Preemptive scheduling of a single machine to minimize maximum cost subject to release dates and precedence constraints. Operations Research, 31, 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. R., & Smith, J. C. (2003). A multiple-criterion model for machine scheduling. Journal of Scheduling, 6, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, J. A. (1996). Single-machine scheduling to minimize a function of two or three maximum cost criteria. Journal of Algorithms, 21, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, W. A. (1974). Some simple scheduling algorithms. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 21, 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, J. Y.-T., Pinedo, M., & Wan, G. H. (2010). Competitive two agent scheduling and its applications. Operations Research, 58, 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sourd, F. (2001). Preemptive scheduling with two minimax criteria. Annals of Operations Research, 107, 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, L., Yuan, J. J., & Gen, Z. C. (2012). A note on the preemptive scheduling to minimize total completion time with release time and deadline constraints (submitted).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the associate editor and two anonymous referees for their constructive comments and kind suggestions. This research was supported in part by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University under Grant no G-YL36 and The National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant nos 11271338 and 11171313.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. T. Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yuan, J.J., Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. Two-agent single-machine scheduling with release dates and preemption to minimize the maximum lateness. J Sched 18, 147–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-013-0360-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-013-0360-y

Keywords

Navigation