Abstract
Traditional research on gender differences in productivity focuses on academic scientists, and rarely investigates outcomes other than publications. We investigate gender disparities in commercial outcomes, for scientists in both the academic and industrial sectors. Using a unique combination of career history data and patenting information across a period of two decades, we present descriptive statistics and graphical trends of male and female commercialization. Empirical evidence indicates that female scientists engage in and produce less commercial work then their male counterparts, and that the degree of disparity remains constant across time. The quality and impact of women’s commercial work remains the same or better than that of men scientists, however. These results imply that a necessary focus for future work is to understand the personal, structural, and organizational reasons for the filtering process which leads to such a small proportion of female inventors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.B. Audretsch P.E. Stephan (1999) ArticleTitle‘Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: sources and incentives’ Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9 97–107 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001910050076
S.E. Berryman (1983) Who will do Science? Rocke- feller Foundation New York
B. Bozeman J.S. Dietz M. Gaughan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Scientific and Technical Human Capital: An Alternative Model for Research Evaluation’ International Journal of Technology Management 22 716–740 Occurrence Handle10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988
Bunker Whittington, K., 2005, ‘Patterns of Dissemination in Public and Private Science: The Effects of Gender and Discipline.,’ Working paper.
Bunker Whittington, K., (in progress), ‘Employment Sectors as Opportunity Structures: The Effects of Location on Male and Female Scientific Dissemination.,’ Dissertation, Stanford University.
J. Cole S. Cole (1973) Social Stratification in Science University of Chicago Press Chicago
J.R. Cole H. Zuckerman (1984) ‘The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication of Men and Women Scientists,’ P. Maehr M.W. Steinkamp (Eds) Advances in Motivation and Achievement JAI Press Greenwich, CT 217–58
Croissant, J.L. and L. Smith-Doerr, ‘Organizational Contexts of Science: Boundaries and Relationships between University and Industry.’ in E.J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (Forthcoming).
C.S. Davis et al. (1996) The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advance- ment of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering Jossey-Bass San Francisco
P. Ducor (2000) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Property: Coauthorship and Coinventorship’ Science 289 873–879 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.289.5481.873 Occurrence Handle10960318
H. Etzkowitz C. Kemelgor B. Uzzi (2000) ‘Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology’ Cambridge University Presss Cambridge
M.F. Fox (1983) ArticleTitle‘Publication Productivity Among Scientists: A␣Critical Review’ Social Studies of Science 13 285–305
M.F. Fox (1996) ‘Women and Scientific Careers,’ S. Jasanoff G.E. Markle J.C. Petersen T. Pinch (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies Sage Thousand Oaks, CA 205–24
M.F. Fox (2001) ArticleTitle‘Women, Science, and Academia—Graduate Education and Careers’ Gender & Society 15 654–666
M.F. Fox P.E. Stephan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Careers of Young Scientists: Preferences, Prospects, and Realities by Gender and Field’ Social Studies of Science 31 109–122
L. Grant I. Kennelly K.B. Ward (2000) ArticleTitle‘Revisiting the Gender, Marriage, and Parenthood Puzzle in Scientific Careers’ Women’s Studies Quarterly 28 62–85
Hall, B.H., A.B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, 2001, ‘The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.’ NBER Working Paper 8498.
Jaffe A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and M.S. Fogarty, 2000, ‘The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western Reserve Survey of Patentees,’ NBER Working Papers 7631, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
D.L. Kleinman S.P. Vallas (2001) ArticleTitle‘Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the ‘Knowledge Worker’: The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States’ Theory and Society 30 451–492 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011815518959
Kleinman, D.L. and S.P. Vallas, 2005, ‘Contradiction in Convergence: Universities and Industry in the Biotechnology Field.’ Forthcoming in The New Political Sociology of Science, S. Frickel and K. Moore (eds.), Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
S. Levin P. Stephan (1998) ArticleTitle‘Gender Differences in the Rewards to Publishing in Academe: Science in the 1970s’ Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 38 IssueID11/12 1049–1064 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018882711314
J.S. Long (1992) ArticleTitle‘Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity’ Social Forces 71 159–78
J.S. Long (Eds) (2001) From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers National Academy Press Washington, DC
J.S. Long M.F. Fox (1995) ArticleTitle‘Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism’ Annual Review of Sociology 21 45–71
E. Marshall (2000) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Property: Patent Suit Pits Postdoc Against Former Mentor’ Science 287 2399–2401 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.287.5462.2399 Occurrence Handle10766614
R.P. Morgan C. Kruytbosch N. Kannankutty (2001) ArticleTitle‘Patenting and Invention Activity of U.S. Scientists and Engineers in the Academic Sector: Comparisons with Industry’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26 173–183 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007856800497
D.C. Mowery R.C. Nelson B.N. Sampat A.A. Ziedonis (2004) Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act Stanford Business Books Stanford, CA
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1998) Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists National Academy Press Washington, D.C.
National Science Foundation, 1995, ‘Division of Science Resources Studies, Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System (SESTAT)’. The SESTAT web site is http:// sestat.nsf.gov.
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Science Foundation (2002) Science and Engineering Indicators 2002 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C.
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Science Foundation (2004) Science and Engineering Indicators Arlington VA
J. Owen-Smith (2005) ArticleTitle‘Trends and Transitions in the Institutional Environment for Public and Private Science’ Journal of Higher Education 49 91–117 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4
J. Owen-Smith (2003) ArticleTitle‘From Separate Systems to a Hybrid Order: Accumulative Advantage across Public and Private Science at Research One Universities’ Research Policy 32 1081–1104 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00111-7
J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001) ArticleTitle‘Careers and Contradictions: Faculty Responses to the Transformation of Knowledge and its Uses in the Life Sciences’ The Transformation of Work, Research in the Sociology of Work 10 109–140
K. Packer A. Webster (1996) ArticleTitle‘Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the wheel of scientific credibility’ Science, Technology and Human Values 21 IssueID4 427–53
W.W. Powell K.W. Koput L. Smith-Doerr (1996) ArticleTitle‘Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology’ Administrative Science Quarterly 41 116–145
L. Schiebinger (1999) Has Feminism Changed Science? Harvard University Press Cambridge
S. Slaughter L.L. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore
L. Smith-Doerr (2004a) ArticleTitle‘Flexibility and Fairness: Effects of the Network Form of Organization on Gender Equity in Life Science Careers’ Sociological Perspectives 47 IssueID1 25–54 Occurrence Handle10.1525/sop.2004.47.1.25
L. Smith-Doerr (2004b) Women’s Work: Gender Equality versus Hierarchy in the Life Sciences Lynne Rienner Publishers Boulder, CO
P. Stephan (1996) ArticleTitle‘The Economics of Science’ Journal of Economic Literature 34 1199–1235
Trajtenberg, M., 1990, ‘Product Innovations, Price Indices and the (Mis) Measurement of Economic Performance,’ NBER Working Papers 3261, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
M. Trajtenberg A. Jaffe R. Henderson (1997) ArticleTitle‘University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basics of Invention’ Economics of Innovation and new Technology 5 IssueID1 19–50
Y. Xie K.A. Shauman (1998) ArticleTitle‘Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle (in Sociology of Science)’ American Sociological Review 63 847–870
L.G. Zucker M.R. Darby M.B. Brewer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises’ American Economic Review 88 290–306
H. Zuckerman (1987) ‘Persistence and Change in the Careers of Men and Women Scientists and Engineers,’ S. Dix Linda (Eds) Women: Their Underrepresentation and Career Differentials in Science and Engineering National Academy Press Washington, DC
H. Zuckerman (1988) ‘The Sociology of Science,’ N.J. Smelser (Eds) Handbook of Sociology Sage Newbury Park, CA 511–574
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Classification: J16, O31, J24
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whittington, K.B., Smith-Doerr, L. Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences. J Technol Transfer 30, 355–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5