Abstract
Entrepreneurial behavior by professors—including decisions about collaboration with industry, patenting and spinning off companies—can affect the productivity of top universities’ technology transfer efforts. Interviews with 98 professors at 12 southeastern universities showed that the most significant influence on these aspects of entrepreneurial behavior is the beliefs of professors about the proper role of universities in the dissemination of knowledge. Some institutional policies, notably revenue splits with inventors, can affect aspects of this behavior. These findings suggest that both university incentive policies and ethical concerns about academic capitalism, by limiting the productivity of technology transfer efforts, have an effect on regional economic development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Agrawal R. Henderson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 44–60 Occurrence Handle10.1287/mnsc.48.1.44.14279
D. Alpert (1985) ArticleTitle‘Performance and Paralysis: The Organizational Context of the American Research University’ Journal of Higher Education 56 IssueID3 241–281
J.E.L. Bercovitz M.P. Feldman I. Feller R.M. Burton (2001) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and License Behavior: An Explanatory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins and Pennsylvania State Universities’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26 21–35 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007828026904
B.R. Clark (1987) The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Princeton, NJ
J.R. Cole S. Cole (1973) Social Stratification in Science University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
K.S. Dueker (1997) ArticleTitle‘Biobusiness on Campus: Commercialization of University-Developed Biomedical Technologies,’ Food and Drug Law Journal 52 453–509
H. Etzkowitz (1983) ArticleTitle‘Entrepreneurial Scientists and Entrepreneurial Universities in American Academic Science’ Minerva 21 IssueID2–3 198–233
H. Etzkowitz A. Webster P. Healy (1998) Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia State University of New York Press Albany, NY
M.P. Feldman I. Feller J.E.L. Bercovitz R.M. Burton (2001) ‘Understanding Evolving University–Industry Relationships’ M.P. Feldman A. Link (Eds) Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston, MA
I. Feller (1997) ‘Technology Transfer from Universities,’ J.C. Smart (Eds) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research NumberInSeriesVolume XII Agathon Press New York
W.B. Gartner (1988) ArticleTitle‘Who Is An Entrepreneur? Is the Wrong Question’ American Journal of Small Business 12 IssueID4 11–32
R.L. Geiger (1986) To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities 1900–1940 Oxford University Press New York
H.A. Goldstein M.I. Luger (1997) ‘Assisting Economic and Business Development’ M.W. Peterson D. Dill L. Mets (Eds) Planning and Management for a Changing Environment Jossey Bass Publishers San Francisco
E.J. Hackett (1990) ArticleTitle‘Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science’ Journal of Higher Education 61 IssueID3 241–279
R. Henderson A.B. Jaffe M. Trajtenberg (1998) ArticleTitle‘Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988’ Review of Economics and Statistics 80 IssueID1 119–127 Occurrence Handle10.1162/003465398557221
R.A. Jenson J.C. Thursby M.C. Thursby (2003) ArticleTitle‘Disclosure and Licensing of University Inventions: The Best We Can Do with the S**t We Get To Work With’ International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 IssueID9 1271–1300
M. Kenney (1986) Biotechnology: The University–Industrial Complex Yale University Press New Haven, CT
J.P. Liebeskind (2001) ArticleTitle‘Risky Business: Universities and Intellectual Property’ Academe 87 IssueID5 49–54
J.V. Lombardi D.D. Craig E.D. Capaldi D.S. Gater (2002) The Top American Research Universities The Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance, University of Florida Gainesville, FL
R.S. Lowen (1991) ArticleTitle‘Transforming the University: Administrators, Physicists, and Industrial and Federal Patronage at Stanford, 1935–49’ History of Education Quarterly 31 IssueID3 365–388
R.K. Merton (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations University of Chicago Press Chicago
D.C. Mowery N. Rosenberg (1998) Paths of Innovation Cambridge University Press Cambridge
D.C. Mowery S.N. Sampart A. Ziedonis (2002) ArticleTitle‘Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning and the Characteristic of US University Patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981–1992’ Management Science 48 IssueID1 73–89
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council (1995) Research-doctoral Programs in the United States Continuity and Change Washington, D.C
InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Science Board (2000) Science and Engineering Indicators-2000 National Science Foundation Arlington, VA
J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001a) ‘Careers and Contradictions: Faculty Responses to the Transformation of Knowledge and its Uses in the Life Sciences’ S.P. Valias (Eds) The Transformation of Work JAI Amsterdam, New York
J. Owen-Smith W.W. Powell (2001b) ArticleTitle‘To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer’ Journal of Technology Transfer 26 99–114 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1007892413701
G. Pisano S. Weijian D.J. Teece (1988) ‘Joint Ventures and Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry’ D.C. Mowery (Eds) International Collaborative Ventures in U.S Manufacturing Ballinger Publishing Co. Cambridge, MA
Reynolds, P., 1994, ‘Reducing Barriers to Understanding New Firm Gestation: Prevalence and Success of Nascent Entrepreneurs,’ Unpublished paper, presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX.
D. Siegel D. Waldman A. Link (2003) ArticleTitle‘Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Relative Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study’ Research Policy 32 27–48 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
S. Slaughter L.L. Leslie (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, MD
U.S. Congress, O. o. T.A., 1984, Commercial Biotechnology, New York: Pergamon Press.
L.G. Zucker M. Darby J. Armstrong (1998a) ArticleTitle‘Geographically Localized Knowledge: Spillovers or Markets?’ Economic Inquiry 36 IssueID1 65–86
L.G. Zucker M. Darby M.B. Brewer (1998b) ArticleTitle‘Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology’ American Economic Review 88 IssueID1 290–306
L.G. Zucker M. Darby J. Armstrong (1999) Intellectual Capital and the Firm: The Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Cambridge, MA
L.G. Zucker M. Darby J. Armstrong (2001) Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture and Firm Performance in Biotechnology National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renault, C.S. Academic Capitalism and University Incentives for Faculty Entrepreneurship. J Technol Transfer 31, 227–239 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-6108-x