Skip to main content
Log in

Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The R&E tax credit has never been effective and subsequent attempts to restructure it have not addressed the major deficiencies. Moreover, in the 25 years since the R&E tax credit was enacted, a steadily increasing number of countries have implemented or expanded competing tax incentives, which in many cases are better structured and larger in size. As a result, the relative impact of the US credit is now negative in terms of incentives to conduct R&D within the domestic economy. The inadequacy of the credit stems largely from its small size and its incremental format. The impact of an R&D tax incentive is affected by its scope of coverage, the ability of industry to take advantage of it over the entire R&D cycle, the magnitude of the incentive relative to other nations’ tax policies, and its ease of implementation. In the end, a tax incentive must sufficiently lower the user’s cost of R&D to overcome barriers to allocation of private-sector resources commensurate with the potential rates of return on such investments. As a policy instrument, a tax incentive for R&D should be most effective if its form is a flat rate applied to all R&D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sawyer (2004).

  2. An accurate assessment of the credit’s impact requires data on company-level R&D investment and the motivations for such investment. Only one study reviewed in the GAO report (1996) actually interviewed company R&D managers (Mansfield 1986) and this study found little impact of the credit on R&D portfolio composition.

  3. These two countries have the second and third highest ratios of government R&D funding to GDP (OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators, Vol. 2006/1).

References

  • Billings, B. A. (2003). Are US tax incentives for corporate R&D likely to motivate American firms to perform research abroad? Tax Executive, 7–8, 291–315.

  • Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do tax credits work? evidence from a panel of countries, 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Link, A. (1984). Tax incentives for R&D: A critical evaluation. Research Policy, 13, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., & Link, A. (1985). Public support for private R&D: The case of the research tax credit. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4, 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (1996). Tax policy and administration (GAO/GGD-96–43). Washington, DC.

  • Hall, B. (1993). R&D tax policy during the 1980s: Success or failure? In J. Poterba (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 7). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29, 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, T. (2001). Treasury to reserve Clinton-Era rules on research credits. Wall Street Journal, 243(December 2), A2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1986). The R&D tax credit and other technology policy issues. American Economic Review, 76, 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moris, F. (2005). The research and experimentation tax credit in the 1990s InfoBrief (NSF 05–316), National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.

  • National Science Board. (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2004 (NSB 061). National Science Foundation.

  • Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Innovation and Commercialization of Emerging Technology. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, A. (2004). Potential implications of providing tax incentives for research and development in NZ. Report for the Royal Society of New Zealand (February).

  • Surrey, S. (1969). Tax incentives: Conceptual criteria for identification and comparison with direct government expenditures. In Proceedings of the Tax Institute of America, pp. 20–21.

  • Tassey, G. (1996). Choosing government R&D policies: Tax incentives vs. direct funding. Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 579–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G. (2007). The technology imperative. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Tassey.

Additional information

Adapted from Tassey (2007). The author is indebted to Gary Anderson for a number of helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tassey, G. Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit. J Technol Transfer 32, 605–615 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9045-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9045-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation