Abstract
This paper shows that the effect of location in science and technology parks is not homogeneous for all firms. The proposed model contemplates a non-linear relationship between belonging to a science and technology park and innovation performance, considering the firm’s absorptive capacity as a moderating variable. A panel dataset of firms located both in and off a park is created, and three main effects are identified. Pre-catching up firms have a low absorptive capacity, and their location in a science and technology park does not improve their innovation performance. Catching up firms have a medium absorptive capacity and constitute the group that can be observed to benefit more by their presence in a science and technology park. Additionally, pre-frontier sharing firms has a high absorptive capacity; however, knowledge duplicity reduces the impact of science and technology parks on their innovation performance. Findings arise practical implications for governments (how to assign public resources to parks?), managers of parks (how to select to the firms of a park?) and managers who need to decide about the convenience of locating their companies on a park (when my company is interested in locating in a park?).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use the following mathematical notation \( \gamma_{{m_{i} }} \) to express the partial derivatives: \( \gamma_{{m_{i} }} = \frac{\partial \gamma }{{\partial m_{i} }} \) and, similarly, \( \gamma_{{m_{i} m_{i} }} = \frac{{\partial^{2} \gamma }}{{\partial m_{i}^{2} }} \).
References
Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2017). Technology parks versus science parks: Does the university make the difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.012.
Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2010). Science and Technology Parks impacts on tenant organizations: A review of literature. MPRA Paper No. 41914, posted 14. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41914/.
Bakouros, Y. L., Mardas, D. C., & Varsakelis, N. C. (2002). Science park, a high tech fantasy? An analysis of the science parks of Greece. Technovation, 22(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00087-0.
Bascle, G. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 285–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008094339.
Belsley, D. A. (1991). A guide to using the collinearity diagnostics. Computational Economics, 4(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426854.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopolos of the world. The making of twenty-first-century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.
Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2012). The effect of absorptive capacity on innovativeness: Context and information systems capability as catalysts. British Journal of Management, 23(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00725.x.
Chan, K. Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, M. W. (2011). Innovation outcomes of South African new technology-based firms: A contribution to the debate on the performance of science park firms. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 14(4), 361–378.
Chan, K. Y. A., & Pretorius, M. W. (2007). Networking, absorptive capacity, science parks: A proposed conceptual model for firm innovative performance. In Industrial engineering and engineering management, 2007 IEEE international conference (pp. 1925–1929). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2007.4419527.
Chang, D. R., & Chob, H. (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.05.005.
Chen, Y. S., Qiao, S., & Lee, A. H. I. (2014). The impacts of different R&D organizational structures on performance of firms: Perspective of absorptive capacity. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.12.007.
Chen, J., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). New product development speed: Too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00896.x.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763.
Collinson, S. C., & Wang, R. (2012). The evolution of innovation capability in multinational enterprise subsidiaries: Dual network embeddedness and the divergence of subsidiary specialisation in Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(9), 1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.007.
Colombo, M., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00178-0.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406.
Dettwiler, P., Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2006). Business environment and property management issues - a study of growth firms in Sweden. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(3), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010610711748.
Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2015). Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: How can firms benefit most? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9329-4.
Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2017a). The effect of science and technology parks on a firm’s performance: A dynamic approach over time. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0481-5.
Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2017b). The effect of science and technology parks on firms’ performance: How can firms benefit most under economic downturns? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(10), 1153–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1274390.
Díez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2016). How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park. Technovation, 50–51, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.001.
Díez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sánchez, A. (2017). Research evolution in science parks and incubators: Foundations and new trends. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1243–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2218-5.
Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. (1992). Gaining comparative advantage through discretionary expenditures: The returns to R&D and advertising. Management Science, 38(9), 1264–1279. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1264.
Felsenstein, D. (1994). University-related science parks –‘seedbeds’ or ‘enclaves’ of innovation? Technovation, 14(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90099-X.
Ferguson, R., & Olofsson, C. (2004). Science park and the development of NTBFs-location, survival and growth. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd.
Fernhaber, S. A., & Patel, P. C. (2012). How do young firms manage product portfolio complexity? The role of absorptive capacity and ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1516–1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1994.
Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Lu, J., & Wright, M. (2011). Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: Evidence from Zhongguancun Science Park in China. Research Policy, 40(3), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.003.
Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005.
Gao, S., Xu, K., & Yang, J. (2008). Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9096-1.
González-Sánchez, R., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2011). Conceptuación y medición del constructo capacidad de absorción: Hacia un marco de integración. Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas, 18, 43–65.
Gordon, I. R., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37(3), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098002096.
Hansen, B. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00124.
Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.834.
Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017a). Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9522-3.
Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017b). The growth of US science and technology parks: Does proximity to a university matter? Annals of Regional Science, 59(2), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0842-5.
Huang, K. F., Yu, C. M. J., & Seetoo, D. H. (2012). Firm innovation in policy-driven parks and spontaneous clusters: The smaller firm the better? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9248-9.
Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., García-Morales, V. J., & Molina, L. M. (2011). Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5–6), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.002.
Johansson, B., & Lööf, H. (2008). Innovation activities explained by firm attributes and location. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(6), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590701407349.
Kleinknecht, A., Van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590210899.
Klette, T. J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Empirical patterns of firm growth and R&D investment: A quality ladder model interpretation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00529.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635279.
Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2004). Applied linear statistical models. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L.
Leiponen, A. (2005). Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5–6), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.03.005.
Leyden, D. P., Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2008). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the decision to locate on a university research park. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912810.
Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2003). Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden: Implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861823493.
Lindelöf, P., & Löftsen, H. (2004). Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University-industry links for technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3/4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034125.29979.ae.
Link, A. N. (2009). Research, science, and technology parks: An overview of the academic literature. In National Research Council, Understanding research, science and technology parks: Global best practices. Report of a symposium (pp. 127–196). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12546.
Link, A. N. (2016). Competitive advantages from university research parks. In D. B. Audretsch, A. N. Link, & M. L. Walshok (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local competitiveness (pp. 337–344). New York: Oxford University Press.
Link, A. N., & Link, K. R. (2003). On the growth of U.S. science parks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021634904546.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). U.S. science parks: The diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00085-7.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2006). U.S. university research parks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1–2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-7126-x.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The economics of university research parks. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm030.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2015). Research, science, and technology parks: Vehicles for technology transfer. In A. N. Link, D. S. Siegel, & M. Wright (Eds.), The Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Link, A. N., & Yang, U. Y. (2017). On the growth of Korean technoparks. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0459-2.
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities: Spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022220216972.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden: Industrial renewal and development? R&D Management, 31(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00219.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2003). Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms. Technovation, 23(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00086-4.
Montoro-Sánchez, M. A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Mora-Valentín, E. M. (2011). Effects of knowledge spillovers on innovation and collaboration in science and technology parks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 948–970. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179307.
Mora-Valentín, E. M., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & Nájera-Sánchez, J. J. (2018). Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9654-8.
Motohashi, K. (2013). The role of the science park in innovation performance of start-up firms: An empirical analysis of Tsinghua Science Park in Beijing. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 578–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2012.673841.
Ondategui, J. C. (2002). Parques científicos e innovación en España. Quince años de experiencia. Economía Industrial, 346, 147–160.
Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Time series and panel data econometrics. Oxford: OUP.
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001.
Poon, T. S. C. (1998). Inter-firm networks and industrial development in the global manufacturing system: Lessons from Taiwan. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 9(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/103530469800900206.
Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry link and innovation: Questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-E.
Ramírez-Alesón, M., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2018). Unravelling the effects of science parks on the innovation performance of NTBFs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 482–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9559-y.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effect. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404.
Salvador, E. (2011). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0.
Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: Exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086-9.
Skeels, C. L., & Vella, F. (1999). A Monte Carlo investigation of the sampling behavior of conditional moment tests in tobit and probit models. Journal of Econometrics, 92(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00092-X.
Squicciarini, M. (2008). Science park tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9037-z.
Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks: Seedbeds of innovation? A duration analysis of firms’ patenting activity. Small Business and Economics, 32(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9075-9.
Todo, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhou, L. A. (2011). Intra-industry knowledge spillovers from foreign direct investment in research and development: Evidence from China’s “Silicon Valley”. Review of Development Economics, 15(3), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00628.x.
Tsai, K. H. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443.
Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.012.
Tucker, J. W. (2010). Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 31–57.
Tzabbar, D., Aharonson, B. S., & Amburgey, T. L. (2013). When does tapping external sources of knowledge result in knowledge integration? Research Policy, 42(2), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.007.
Vásquez-Urriago, A. R., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego Rico, A. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006.
Vásquez-Urriago, A. R., Barge-Gil, A., Modrego Rico, A., & Paraskevopoulou, E. (2014). The impact of science and technology parks on firms’ product innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(4), 835–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-013-0337-1.
Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (2005). R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23(5–6), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.01.008.
Westhead, P. (1997). R&D inputs and outputs of technology-based firms located on and off science parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00041.
Westhead, P., & Storey, D. (1994). An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the United Kingdom. London: HMSO.
Yang, C. H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001.
Yu, P. (2013). Inconsistency of 2SLS estimators in threshold regression with endogeneity. Economics Letters, 120(3), 532–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.06.023.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351.
Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E., & Larrañeta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 569–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm018.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.138.14274.
Funding
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain (ECO2015-67434-R and ECO2017-85356-P) and for the Regional Government of Madrid and European Social Fund (EARLYFIN, S2015/HUM-3353).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ubeda, F., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. & Mora-Valentín, EM. Do firms located in science and technology parks enhance innovation performance? The effect of absorptive capacity. J Technol Transf 44, 21–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9686-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9686-0