Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited

  • Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Age is one of the most robust correlates of criminal behavior. Yet, explanations for this relationship are varied and conflicting. Developmental theories point to a multitude of sociological, psychological, and biological changes that occur during adolescence and adulthood. One prominent criminological perspective outlined by Gottfredson and Hirschi claims that age has a direct effect on crime, inexplicable from sociological and psychological variables. Despite the attention this claim has received, few direct empirical tests of it have been conducted. We use data from Pathways to Desistance, a longitudinal study of over 1,300 serious youthful offenders (85.8 % male, 40.1 % African-American, 34.3 % Hispanic, 21.0 % White), to test this claim. On average, youths were 16.5 years old at the initial interview and were followed for 7 years. We use multilevel longitudinal models to assess the extent to which the direct effects of age are reduced to statistical and substantive non-significance when constructs from a wide range of developmental and criminological theories are controlled. Unlike previous studies, we are able to control for changes across numerous realms emphasized within differing theoretical perspectives including social control (e.g., employment and marriage), procedural justice (e.g., perceptions of the legitimacy and fairness of the legal system), learning (e.g., gang membership and exposure to antisocial peers), strain (e.g., victimization and relationship breakup), psychosocial maturity (e.g., impulse control, self-regulation and moral disengagement), and rational choice (e.g., costs and rewards of crime). Assessed separately, these perspectives explain anywhere from 3 % (procedural justice) to 49 % (social learning) of the age-crime relationship. Together, changes in these constructs explain 69 % of the drop in crime from ages 15 to 25. We conclude that the relationship between age and crime in adolescence and early adulthood is largely explainable, though not entirely, attributable to multiple co-occurring developmental changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D., & Waterman, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Sociological Methodology, 32, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (2006). G. Stanley Hall’s Adolescence: Brilliance and nonsense. History of Psychology, 9, 186–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbarnelli, C., Caprara, C. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J. A., & Visher, C. (Eds.). (1986). Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, C. L. (1992). Constancy and change in the U.S. age distribution of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cauffman, E., & Woolard, J. (1999). The future outlook inventory: Measure developed for the MacArthur network on adolescent development and juvenile justice. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Cernkovich, S. A., Giordano, P. C., & Pugh, M. D. (1985). Chronic offenders: The missing cases in self-report delinquency research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 705–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the American family today. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., & Bowling, B. (1997). Structuration, human development and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology, 39, 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. (1985). Age, crime and social explanation. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. (1994). The historical variability of the age-crime relationship. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. (2008). Age, sex, and racial distributions of crime. In E. Goode (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 38–48). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E., Josselson, R., Knerr, C., & Knerr, B. (1975). The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 4, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., & McCarthy, B. (1997). Mean streets: Youth crime and homelessness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence: Its psychology and its relations to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion, and education (Vol. 1–2). Norwalk, CT: Appelton-Century-Crofts.

  • Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 552–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1995). Control theory and the life-course perspective. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 4, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2008). Critiquing the critics: The authors respond. In E. Goode (Ed.), Out of control: Assessing the general theory of crime (pp. 217–231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, J., Osgood, D. W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra- individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & South, S. (2011). Crime, race, and the transition to marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. W., & Maxson, C. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M., & Sweeten, G. (2012). Breaking up is hard to do: Romantic dissolution, offending, and substance use during the transition to adulthood. Criminology, 50, 605–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31, 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 28, pp. 1–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R. (2012). Does the study of the age-crime curve have a future? In R. Loeber & B. C. Welsh (Eds.), The future of criminology (pp. 11–19). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. CA: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Transitions from juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal concerns, justice policy, and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-offenders reform and reclaim their lives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massoglia, M. (2006). Desistance or displacement: The changing patterns of offending from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). ‘Life-course-persistent’ and ‘adolescence-limited’ antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009a). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and desistance from antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1520–1530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009b). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1654–1668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, L., et al. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 213–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwbeerta, P., Blokland, A. A. J., Piquero, A. R., & Sweeten, G. (2011). A life-course analysis of offense specialization across age: Introducing a new method for studying individual specialization over the life course. Crime & Delinquency, 57, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W. (2005). Making sense of crime and the life course. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W. (2012). Some future trajectories for life course criminology. In R. Loeber & B. C. Welsh (Eds.), The future of criminology (pp. 3–10). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., Bachman, J. G., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petras, H., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). Participation and frequency during criminal careers across the life span. Criminology, 48, 607–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In A. Liberman (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 23–78). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Blumstein, A., Brame, R., Haapanen, R., Mulvey, E., & Nagin, D. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 54–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96, 267–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 359–506). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal careers research: New analysis from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Winfree, L. T., Jr, Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A metal-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., Van Hoewyk, J., & Solenberger, P. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Cauffman, E., Steinberg, L., Hecker, T., Losoya, S. H., et al. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 2, 37–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Evidence-based crime prevention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. J., Andersen, E., Harer, M. D., & Streifel, C. (1989). Age and the distribution of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 803–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2008). Co-offending and the age-crime curve. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeten, G. (2012). Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P. (1997). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R. (1988). Two empirical regularities (maybe) in search of an explanation: Commentary on the age/crime debate. Criminology, 26, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., & Grasmick, H. G. (1997). Criminal behavior and age: A test of three provocative hypotheses. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 81, 309–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R., & Ward, D. A. (1993). The interaction of age with the correlates and causes of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1997). Procedural fairness and compliance with the law. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 67, 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C., & Piliavin, I. (1997). Asymmetrical causation and criminal desistance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1399–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergés, A., Jackson, K. M., Bucholz, K. K., Grant, J. D., Trull, T. J., Wood, P. K., et al. (2012). Deconstructing the age-prevalence curve of alcohol dependence: Why “maturing out” is only a small piece of the puzzle. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 511–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walden, T. A., Harris, V. S., & Caltron, T. F. (2003). How I feel: A self-report measure of emotional arousal and regulation for children. Psychological Assessment, 15, 399–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1993). Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology, 31, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A., & Schwartz, G. E. (1990). Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: a typological perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 381–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, J. G. (1986). Issues in the measurement of criminal careers. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, & C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and “career criminals” (Vol. 2, pp. 1–51). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D., & Piquero, A. R. (2008). How well do criminologists explain crime? Statistical modeling in published studies. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 453–502). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. N., Barnes, J. C., Meldrum, R. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2011). Assessing and explaining misperceptions of peer delinquency. Criminology, 49, 599–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., & Messner, S. F. (2000). The effects of alternative measures of delinquent peers on self-reported delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (2000-MU–MU-0007), the National Institute of Justice (199-IJ-CX-0053), the National Institute of Drug Abuse (R01 DA019697-01), the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the William T. Grant Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Center for Disease Control, The William Penn Foundation, The Arizona Governor’s Justice Commission, and the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. We are grateful for their support. The content of this paper, however, is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.

Author Contributions

GS and ARP conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and drafted the manuscript; GS, ARP, and LS participated in the interpretation of the data and the finalization of the manuscript; LS and ARP participated in the design and coordination of the study and GS performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex R. Piquero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sweeten, G., Piquero, A.R. & Steinberg, L. Age and the Explanation of Crime, Revisited. J Youth Adolescence 42, 921–938 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9926-4

Keywords

Navigation