Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of natural and artificial radionuclides in Mission (Texas) surface soils

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residents in the city of Mission, Texas have been noted to complain of health related problems possibly associated with low dose radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to quantify radioactivity levels in the entire Mission area by measuring natural and anthropogenic radionuclide concentrations (226Ra, 228Ra, 137Cs) in 30 representative surface soil samples through high-resolution gamma-ray spectroscopy. The activity concentrations of these radionuclides followed an approximately normal distribution across the samples and were found to be comparable to other similar studies. In addition, radiological impact assessment factors were calculated and found to be within the recommended values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yii M, Wan Mahmood ZY, Ahmad Z, Jaffary N, Ishak K (2011) NORM activity concentration in sediment cores from the Peninsular Malaysia East Coast Exclusive Economic Zone. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289(3):653–661. doi:10.1007/s10967-010-0928-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Noureddine A, Baggoura B, Larosa JJ, Vajda N (1997) Gamma and alpha emitting radionuclides in some Algerian soil samples. Appl Radiat Isot 48(8):1145–1148. doi:10.1016/S0969-8043(97)00046-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayumbu P, Zaman MB, Lubaba NCH, Munsanje SS, Muleya D (1995) Natural radioactivity in Zambian building materials collected from Lusaka. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 199(3):229–238. doi:10.1007/BF02162371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. UNSCEAR (2001) UNSCEAR 2001 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes sources and effects of ionizing radiation United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation

  5. Chinnaesakki S, Chopra M, Kumar S, Arora V, Sartandel SJ, Bara SV, Bajwa BS (2011) Assessment of natural radioactivity in soil samples and comparison of direct and indirect measurement of environmental air kerma rate. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 289(3):885–892. doi:10.1007/s10967-011-1192-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kannan V, Rajan MP, Iyenga MA, Ramesh R (2002) Distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in soil and beach sand samples of Kalpakkam (India) using hyper pure germanium (HPGe) gamma ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 57(1):109–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. USCB (2013) Mission (city), Texas State and Country QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/48/4848768.html. Accessed 4 Nov 2014

  8. Roebuck J (2009) Mission residents to face Hayes-Sammons plant in court. http://www.themonitor.com/news/local/article_7d4d19d7-4598-559c-ad14-f44a7f6139ea.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2014

  9. Qureshi AA, Tariq S, Din KU, Manzoor S, Calligaris C, Waheed A (2014) Evaluation of excessive lifetime cancer risk due to natural radioactivity in the rivers sediments of Northern Pakistan. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7(4):438–447. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2014.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams J, Lowder W, Gesell T (1972) The natural radiation environment II, CONF-720805-P2. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on the Natural Radiation Environment, Houston, TX

  11. STP (2015) South Texas Project Electric Generating Station. http://www.stpegs.com/-/about-us. Accessed 1 Jan 2015

  12. Hannan M, Hanson G (2006) Measurement of active concentrations of radio nuclides (238U, 235U, 226Ra, 40K, and 137Cs) in Mission (Texas) soils using the high purity germanium gamma-ray spectrometry. Paper presented at the Pacific Basin nuclear conference 2006, Sydney, Australia

  13. Hannan MA, Nguyen N, Rivas M (2013) Natural radioactivity and its gamma dose rate in Mission (Texas) soils. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295(1):729–736. doi:10.1007/s10967-012-1840-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. EPA (2004) Attachment 14A radioactive decay and equilibrium multi-agency radiological laboratory analytical protocols manual, pp. 223–228

  15. Hamzah Z, Afiqah S, Rahman A, Saat A (2011) Measurement of 226Ra, 228Ra and 40K in soil in district of Kuala Krai using gamma spectrometry. Malays J Anal Sci 15(2):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  16. IAEA (2000) Reference material IAEA-375 radionuclides and trace elements in soil International Atomic Energy Agency analytical quality control services reference sheet. Austria

  17. NIST (2015) 1.3.5.11 Measures of skewness and kurtosis. Engineering statistics handbook 2015 http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35b.htm

  18. CSUB (2015) Univariate statistics: Chapter 4. SPSS from http://www.csub.edu/ssricrem/spss/SPSS11-4/11-4.htm

  19. El-Reefy HI, Sharshar T, Zaghloul R, Badran HM (2006) Distribution of gamma-ray emitting radionuclides in the environment of Burullus Lake: I. Soils and vegetations. J Environ Radioact 87(2):148–169. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2005.11.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Myrick TE, Berven BA, Haywood FF (1983) Determination of concentrations of selected radionuclides in surface soil in the USA. Health Phys 45(3):631–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mireles F, Davila JI, Quirino LL, Lugo JF, Pinedo JL, Rios C (2003) Natural soil gamma radioactivity levels and resultant population dose in the cities of Zacatecas and Guadalupe, Zacatecas, Mexico. Health Phys 84(3):368–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chowdhury MI, Kamal M, Alam MN, Yeasmin S, Mostafa MN (2006) Distribution of naturally occurring radionuclides in soils of the southern districts of Bangladesh. Radiat Prot Dosim 118(1):126–130. doi:10.1093/rpd/nci335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Leung KC, Lau SY, Poon CB (1990) Gamma radiation dose from radionuclides in Hong Kong soil. J Environ Radioact 11(3):279–290. doi:10.1016/0265-931X(90)90020-V

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dowdall M, Gerland S, Lind B (2003) Gamma-emitting natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in the terrestrial environment of Kongsfjord, Svalbard. Sci Total Environ 305(1–3):229–240. doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00478-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. UNSCEAR (1988) Report to the general assembly, with annexes sources, effects, and risks of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anagnostakis MJ, Hinis EP, Simopoulos SE, Angelopoulos MG (1996) Natural radioactivity mapping of Greek surface soils. Environ Int 22(Suppl 1):3–8. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(96)00085-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karakelle B, Öztürk N, Köse A, Varinlioğbrevelu A, Erkol AY, Yilmaz F (2002) Natural radioactivity in soil samples of Kocaeli basin, Turkey. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 254(3):649–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu X, Zhao C, Chen C, Liu W (2012) Radioactivity level of soil around Baqiao coal-fired power plant in China. Radiat Phys Chem 81(12):1827–1832. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.07.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Trabulsy HA, Khater AEM, Habbani FI (2011) Radioactivity levels and radiological hazard indices at the Saudi coastline of the Gulf of Aqaba. Radiat Phys Chem 80(3):343–348. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. UNSCEAR (2000) UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes sources and effects of ionizing radiation (vol. 1: sources)

  31. IBM (2012) BM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 21.0.) IBM Corp, Armonk, New York

  32. Saleh IH (2012) Radioactivity of 238U, 232Th, 40K, and 137Cs and assessment of depleted uranium in soil of the Musandam Peninsula, Sultanate of Oman. Turkish J Eng Env Sci 36:236–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ravisankar R, Chandrasekaran A, Vijayagopal P, Venkatraman B, Senthilkumar G, Eswaran P, Rajalakshmi A (2012) Natural radioactivity in soil samples of Yelagiri Hills, Tamil Nadu, India and the associated radiation hazards. Radiat Phys Chem 81(12):1789–1795. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.07.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu KN, Guan ZJ, Stokes MJ, Young ECM (1992) The assessment of the natural radiation dose committed to the Hong Kong people. J Environ Radioact 17(1):31–48. doi:10.1016/0265-931X(92)90033-P

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Beretka J, Matthew PJ (1985) Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys 48(1):87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported in part by the Office of the Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering through the US Army Research Office under Grant number W911NF-11-1-0150, and the UTPA Science Education Grant number 52007568 from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The authors also thank Dr. Juan Gonzalez for valuable cartographic advice. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Isotopes and Expo held in Chicago, IL, United States, 24–28 August 2014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hannan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hannan, M., Wahid, K. & Nguyen, N. Assessment of natural and artificial radionuclides in Mission (Texas) surface soils. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 305, 573–582 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-015-4018-4

Keywords

Navigation