Introduction

Composite technology in general sets out to combine materials in such a way that the properties of the composite are the optimum for a particular application. The property, whether mechanical, thermal, electrical, etc., is determined by the choice of component and their relative amounts and, most importantly, the “connectivity”, that is the manner in which the components are interconnected [1].

Composites made of ferroelectric ceramics and polymer are very attractive for applications since they combine properties, which are typical for polymers, like good flexibility and the capability of forming with high electroactivity (piezo- and pyroelectric) responses of electroceramics. As a result, one may be able to develop a new material exhibiting properties tailored to various requirements. As the dielectric permittivity is involved in figures of merit of various physical quantities important for applications (e.g., hydrostatic piezoelectric strain coefficient, electromechanical coupling factor), the knowledge of the dielectric response of the composites is essential [2, 3].

Polymer matrix composites containing ferroelectric ceramic powder are widely studied because of their tailored dielectric, thermal, mechanical properties, and easy processing. One of the ferroelectric ceramics like barium titanate (BaTiO3) exhibits high dielectric constant (up to 5,000) depending on its grain size, purity, crystallographic direction, measuring temperature range, and method of preparation. It has low coefficient of thermal expansion, high thermal, and chemical stability. However, it is brittle and requires high processing temperatures. To overcome these drawbacks, several BaTiO3-filled polymers such as polyetheretherketone, epoxy, polyimide, polystyrene, cyanoethyl ester of polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composites have been studied [4].

The perovskite (Ba,Sr)TiO3 (BST) is a intensively investigated ferroelectric due to its unique properties (high permittivity, resistivity, and tunability), which makes it a promising candidate for electronic applications such as multilayer and voltage tunable capacitors, infrared sensors, electrooptic devices, and memories. The mentioned characteristics strongly depend on composition, raw materials, processing, microstructure, temperature, electric field, and frequency, so that, efforts on the BST synthesis are still in progress in order to improve its properties [5]. BST is a lead-free, ferroelectric ceramic with high dielectric permittivity. The main objective of many works is to fabricate composites with high dielectric permittivity values in a wide range of temperature, which can be used in energy storage devices [6].

PVDF is a semicrystalline polymer, which exhibits several molecular conformations depending on the method of preparation. PVDF has got two relaxation processes: less intense one, is attributed to the segmental molecular motions occurring above the glass transition temperature (T g) and the more intense one, taking place at temperatures lower than T g. The more intense relaxation process is resulted from local motions of small groups in the chain. The existence of any high frequency transformation is limited by the movement of the main chain in the molecule PVDF. Relaxation process occurs at low temperatures is described by Vogel–Fulcher’s formula, a relaxation process occurs at higher temperatures by the Arrhenius’s formula [7, 8].

The aim of the work was to obtain Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 (BST60/40) ceramic powder by sol–gel method, to fabricate ceramic–polymer composites of barium strontium titanate BST60/40 and polyvinylidene fluoride PVDF BST//PVDF for concentration of the ceramics phase c v = 50 % by hot pressing method, to characterize microstructure, thermal and dielectric properties of BST60/40 ceramic powder and BST//PVDF composite.

Experiment

Material selection

In this work, the composite BST60/40//PVDF was obtained from (Ba0.6Sr0.4)O3 (BST60/40) ceramic powder and polyvinylidene fluoride PVDF (SIGMA-ALDRICH, Poznan, 99 %) powder by hot pressing method at T = 165 °C, p = 120 MPa, for volume fraction of BST60/40 ceramic powder c v = 50 %. The Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 ceramic powder was prepared by the sol–gel method from barium acetate (Ba(CH3COO)2, SIGMA-ALDRICH, Poznan, 99 %), strontium acetate (Sr(CH3COO)2, SIGMA-ALDRICH, Poznan, 99 %), and tetra-butyl titanate (Ti(OC4H9)4, SIGMA-ALDRICH, Poznan, 97 %) as starting materials.

Manufacturing process

Figure 1 shows the steps of preparing of BST60/40 ceramic powder.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The steps of preparing of BST60/40 ceramic powder: a sol, b gel, c gelating, d dry gel, e before calcinations, f after calcinations

The basic steps for fabrication of BST60/40//PVDF ceramic–polymer composite by hot pressing technique are given in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The basic steps for fabrication of BST60/40//PVDF composite by hot pressing technique

Morphology of samples

The morphology of BST60/40, PVDF, and BST60/40//PVDF powders and samples were observed by transmission electron microscopy Philips EM 400T (Germany) and scanning electron microscopy HITACHI S-4700 (Japan). Transmission (a) and scanning (b) electron micrographs of BST60/40 ceramic, PVDF polymer, and 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite are given in Figs. 3, 4, and 5, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a TEM micrographs of BST60/40 ceramic powder, b SEM micrographs of BST60/40 ceramic sample

Fig. 4
figure 4

a TEM micrographs of PVDF polymer powder, b SEM micrographs of PVDF polymer sample

Fig. 5
figure 5

a TEM micrographs of 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite powder, b SEM micrographs of 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite sample

One can see that polymer grains are arranged around the ceramic grains. The BST60/40 powder is well dispersed in the PVDF polymer matrix without serious powder agglomeration.

Experimental devices

The dry gel was analyzed by thermo-gravimetric analysis and by differential thermal analysis (DTA). Simultaneous measurements were executed in air by STA-409 Netzsch analyzer (Germany). Temperature rate was v = 10 deg min−1. Thermal analysis was carried out in air. The amorphous dry gel of BST60/40 was calcinated at T = 850 °C for t = 4 h.

For electric measurements, composite sample of h = 1-mm thick and d = 10 mm in diameter was covered with silver electrodes. The dielectric properties of BST60/40 ceramics, PVDF polymer, and 50 %BST60/40//PVDF ceramic–polymer composite were studied with the impedance gain/phase analyzer HP4192A (Great Britain) in the frequency range of f = 10 kHz–1 MHz. The measurements were performed with heating from T = −50 to 150 °C at a rate of υ = 1 deg min−1. Dynamic mechanical properties of PVDF and 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite were measured by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis DMTA. DMTA allows to designate dependence of the storage modulus E′ and loss modulus E″ on temperature, frequency, and time. So that the dependency you can get information about the viscoelastic properties of the material. DMTA method also allows the characterization of relaxation processes occurring during glass transition and determine the range of temperature of glass transition for polymeric materials [9, 10]. Storage modulus E′ and loss modulus E″ of PVDF polymer and BST60/40//PVDF composite were measurement by DMTA Q800 analyzer (USA) working in the bending mode (3-point bend), at the frequency f = 100 Hz and temperature range ΔT = −150–150 °C. In this mode, the sample is supported at both ends and force is applied in the middle. 3-point bend is considered a “pure” mode of deformation since clamping effects are eliminated. The l = 50 and 20 mm clamps on the Q800 utilize unique low-friction, roller bearing supports that improve accuracy.

Analysis of the results

Thermal properties

Figure 6 shows thermal analysis curves of BST60/40 dry gel, respectively, before calcination (a) and after calcination (b). One can see from Fig. 6 that dried gel powder exhibited a large total mass loss Δm ≈ 47 %. The analyzes show three stages of mass loss.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Thermal analysis data of BST60/40 dry gel before calcinations, b thermal analysis data of BST60/40 dry gel after calcinations

The peak at around T = 120 °C on the DTG curve and corresponding mass loss Δm 1 ≈ 15 % on the TG curve, are due to the evaporation of solvents. Below T = 300 °C, the first drop corresponds to the evaporation of the solvent.

The second notable mass loss Δm 2 ≈ 21 % was detected at T ≈ 337 °C. The mass loss is probably due to the decomposition of organic additives in the gel. The peak on the DTG curve matched a large exothermic peak in the DTA curve.

The exothermic peak around T ≈ 400 °C and relatively broad exothermic features at T ≈ 650 °C on the DTA curve of dried gel, could be due to crystallization of various intermediate phases. It is known that for sol–gel-derived barium titanate several intermediate phases exist prior to the transformation of the amorphous phase into the perovskite phase. The nature of these intermediate phases and the crystallization sequence depends upon the precursors used [11].

The third notable drop between T = 600 and 800 °C corresponds to a peak of the DTG curve at about T = 718.5 °C. The mass loss originates from the release of various side products during alcoxolation and oxolation.

Figure 6b shows that after calcination no thermal effects take place in BST60/40 powder. On the basis of thermal analysis, the temperature calcination was chosen T = 850 °C for dried gel of BST60/40 powder.

Dielectrical properties

Dependence of the dielectric constant ε′ (a) and dielectric loss factor ε″ (b) on temperature for BST60/40 ceramic at f = 100 kHz is given in Fig. 7. It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the three peaks originated from cubic–tetragonal, tetragonal–orthorhombic, and orthorhombic–rhombohedral phase transition.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε′ (a) and dielectric loss factor ε″ (b) of BST60/40 ceramic at f = 100 kHz

Figure 8a, b, respectively, shown dielectric constant ε′ and dielectric loss factor ε″ of PVDF for f = 50 × 10Hz, f = 100 × 10Hz, f = 500 × 10Hz, and f = 1 × 10Hz. A cusp-like behavior in the frequency and temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε′(f, T) in the temperature range of T = −50 to 60 °C accompanied by absorption maxima increasing and shifting towards higher temperatures with increasing frequency is related to a freezing of dipolar motion in the amorphous region. A dispersive ε′ anomaly and absorption maxima shifting toward higher temperatures and increasing with increasing frequency in the range of T = 60–100 °C are ascribed to wide angle oscillations of dipoles attached to the chain, followed by their rotation with the main chain co-operation appearing in the crystalline phase.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε′ (a) and dielectric loss factor ε″ (b) of polyvinylidene fluoride PVDF

The dielectric absorption behavior apparent in the range of T = −50 to 60 °C is characteristic of the static dipolar freezing of dipolar motion in the absence of a long-range correlation. Dielectric absorption in the crystalline phase of the polymer observed in the temperature range of T = 60–100 °C is described by the oscillation motion of the VDF groups [2, 12].

Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε′ (a) and dielectric loss factor ε″ (b) of 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite at f = 50 × 10Hz, f = 100 × 10Hz, f = 500 × 10Hz, and f = 1 × 10Hz is shown in Fig. 9. One can see that the addition of ceramic phase in the polymer will change the nature of the curve ε′(T). Changing the speed of the curve rise, there is a maximum of the ε′(T) and the dielectric constant increases with increasing of the frequency. Values of the dielectric constant ε′ and dielectric loss factor ε″ increases with increasing of the temperature to εm and ε″ m and next decreasing. In the low temperature range, the dielectric response of the composites is determined by the anomaly characteristic in the glass transition of the polymer, whereas in the high temperature range the relaxation related to the wide angle oscillation of the polymer polar groups followed by their rotation with main chain co-operation is dominant. The addition of the ceramics only slightly changes the dynamics of the α process in the polymer. The addition of the ceramics resulted in the increase thermal strength of the composites.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Temperature dependence of the dielectric constant ε′ (a) and dielectric loss factor ε″ (b) of 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite

Dynamical properties

Figure 10a, b, respectively, shown comparison of temperature dependence of the storage modulus E′ (a) and loss modulus E″ (b) for PVDF polymer and 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite in the temperature range of T = −150 to 150 °C.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Comparison of temperature dependence of the storage modulus E′ (a) and loss modulus E″ (b) for PVDF polymer and 50 %BST60/40//PVDF composite

The addition of BST60/40 ceramic phase in the PVDF polymer changes character E′(T) and E″(T) curves and increases the values of the storage modulus E′ and loss modulus E″. Values of the E′ decreases with increasing of the temperature. Can be observed two maxima in the curve E″(T). The first maximum is in the range of T = −60 to −30 °C. This maximum is characterized by glass transition in the polymer. The second maximum, in the range of T = −10 to 0 °C, due to relaxation processes associated with the wide angle and rotational oscillations of polar groups of the polymer [13]. The movement of parts of the polymer chains in the ceramic–polymer composite is impeded, because of the presence of the ceramic phase. This is manifested less fuzzy maximum on the curve E″(T).

Conclusions

In this study, we have fabricated the 50 %BST60/40//PVDF ceramic–polymer composites using sol–gel-derived barium strontium titanate Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3 fine powder and PVDF polymer powder by using a hot pressing method. Dried gel powder of BST60/40 exhibited a large total mass loss Δm ≈ 47 %. The analyzes show three stages of mass loss: at T = 120, 337, and 718 °C. Three peaks originated from cubic–tetragonal, tetragonal–orthorhombic, and orthorhombic–rhombohedral phase transition can be seen for BST60/40: at T = −70, 0, and 10 °C. Values of the dielectric constant ε′ and dielectric loss factor ε″ increases with increasing of the temperature to εm and εm and next decreasing. In the low temperature range, the dielectric response of the composites is determined by the anomaly characteristic in the glass transition of the polymer, whereas in the high temperature range the relaxation related to the wide angle oscillation of the polymer polar groups followed by their rotation with main chain co-operation is dominant.

The addition of the ceramic phase to a clean polymer substantially alters the course of temperature dependence of dielectric constant ε′, dielectric loss factor ε″, storage modulus E′ and loss modulus E″. The addition of the ceramics only slightly changes the dynamics of the α process in the polymer. The addition of the ceramics resulted in the increase thermal strength of the composites. The movement of parts of the polymer chains in the ceramic–polymer composite is impeded, because of the presence of the ceramic phase.