Skip to main content
Log in

Thermogravimetric study of the reduction of copper slag by biomass

Reduction characteristics and kinetics

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The utilization of copper slag is an attractive option of iron resource. However, extra energy consumption is required and contributes to greenhouse gases. In this paper, biomass was introduced as a new kind of reductant for the reduction of copper slag to decrease the energy consumption. The reduction kinetics and reduction characteristics of three kinds of biomasses were studied by thermogravimetric analyzer (TG). The TG curves showed the reduction reaction of copper slag and biomass could be divided into three stages during heating process: drying and pyrolysis of biomass process (<959 K), pre-reduction process (959–1100 K) and reduction reaction process (>1100 K). Pine sawdust showed the best reducing property and the reduction ratios of pine sawdust, corncob and straw reached to 80.6, 76.1, and 60.0 %, respectively, when the mass ratio of biomass/slag was 2:1. As the additive, CaO had promotion effects on the reduction reaction. With the increase in CaO addition, the reduction ratio of copper slag increased firstly and reached a peak at CaO/slag was 0.3:1 and then it declined due to the changes of slag viscosity. By kinetics analysis, the reduction reaction confirmed well with shrinking core model (R1). The activation energy of reactions was affected by the addition of biomass and heating rate in experiments. With the increase in the addition of biomass, the activation energy of reduction reaction increased gradually; with the increase in heating rate, the activation energy of reduction reaction decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Copper: preliminary date for September 2015. ICSG. http://www.icsg.org.

  2. Shi C, Meyer C, Behnood A. Utilization of copper slag in cement and concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2008;52(10):1115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Rojas MIS, Rivera J, Frias M, Marin F. Use of recycled copper slag for blended cements. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2008;83(3):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Lu H, Chen D, Wang H, Xu H, Zhang R. Preparation and properties of glass–ceramics derived from blast-furnace slag by a ceramic-sintering process. Ceram Int. 2009;35(8):3181–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heo JH, Kim B-S, Park JH. Effect of CaO addition on iron recovery from copper smelting slags by solid carbon. Metall Mater Trans B. 2013;44(6):1352–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang HW, Shi SX, Zhang B, Hong X. Reduction of molten copper slags with mixed CO-CH4-Ar gas. Metall Mater Trans B. 2013;45(2):582–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siwiec G, Oleksiak B, Matula T, Socha L, Stanek W. Reduction of copper slag with the use of carbon granulates. Metallurgy. 2014;53(4):585–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang J, Qi YH, Yan DL, Xu HC. A new technology for copper slag reduction to get molten iron and copper matte. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2014;22(5):396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu JH, Wang H, Li L. Recovery of iron from copper slag by smelting reduction. 2011 International conference on computer, electrical and systems sciences, and engineering, Information Engineering Research Institute, China: 2011; 541–4.

  10. Zhang LN, Zhang L, Wang MY, Sui ZT. Research on the oxidization mechanism in CaO–FeOx–SiO2 slag with high iron content. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc, China. 2005; 15(4): 1-6.

  11. Gyurov S, Rabadjieva D, Kovacheva D, Kostova Y. Kinetics of copper slag oxidation under nonisothermal conditions. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;116(2):945–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bruckard WJ, Somerville M, Hao F. The recovery of copper, by flotation, from calcium-ferrite-based slags made in continuous pilot plant smelting trials. Miner Eng. 2004;17(4):495–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Warczok A, Riveros G. Slag cleaning in crossed electric and magnetic fields. Miner Eng. 2007;20(1):34–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seo K, Fruehan R. Reduction of FeO in slag with coal char. Transactions of the Iron & Steel Institute of Japan. 2000;40(1):7–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Min DJ, Han JW, Chung WS. A study of the reduction rate of FeO in slag by solid carbon. Metallurgical and Materials Transitions. 1999;30B:215–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarma B, Cramb AW, Fruehan RJ. Reduction of FeO in smelting slags by solid carbon experimental results. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. 1993;27(5):717–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Utigard T, Sanchez G, Manriquez J, Lurashi A, Diaz C, Cordero D, Almendras E. Reduction kinetics of liquid iron oxide-containing slags by carbon monoxide. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. 1997;28B:821–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagasaka T, Hino M, Ban-Ya S. Interfacial kinetics of hydrogen with liquid slag containing iron oxide. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. 2000;30B:945–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 3): gasification technologies. Bioresource Technol. 2002;83(1):55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bridgwater AV, Meier D, Radlein D. An overview of fast pyrolysis of biomass. Org Geochem. 1999;30(12):1479–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Han J, Kim H. The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2008;12(2):397–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reddy BR, Murthy BVR, Swamy YV, Ray HS. Correlation of Nickel Extraction with Iron Reduction in Oxidic Nickel Ore by a Thermogravimetric Method. Thermochim Acta. 1995;264:185–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chakraborty A. Kinetics of the reduction of hematite to magnetite near its Curie transition. J Magn Magn Mater. 1999;204(1–2):57–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin Q, Liu R, Chen N. Kinetics of direct reduction of chrome iron ore. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1999;58(2):317–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dang J, Zhang GH, Chou KC. Kinetics and mechanism of hydrogen reduction of ilmenite powders. J Alloy Compd. 2015;619:443–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun YS, Han YX, Gao P, Wei XC, Li GF. Thermogravimetric study of coal-based reduction of oolitic iron ore: kinetics and mechanisms. Int J Miner Process. 2015;143:87–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Akhtar K, Tahmasebi A, Tian L, Yu J, Lucas J. An experimental study of direct reduction of hematite by lignite char. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;123(2):1111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bafghi MS, Fukuda M, Ito Y, Yamada S, Sano M. Effect of CO gas formation on reduction rate of iron oxide in molten slag by graphite. Transactions of the Iron & Steel Institute of Japan. 1993;33(11):1125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sugata M, Sugiyama T, Kondo S. Reduction of iron-oxide contained in molten slags with solid carbon. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan. 1974;14(2):88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Ratchev IP, Lucas JA, Evans GM, Belton GR. Rate of interfacial reaction between liquid iron oxide and CO-CO2. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B. 2000;31B:1049–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Q, Yang Z, Tian J, Li W. Mechanisms of reduction in iron ore-coal composite pellet. Ironmaking Steelmaking. 1997;24(6):457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sah R, Dutta SK. Kinetic Studies of Iron Ore-Coal Composite Pellet Reduction by TG–DTA. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2011;64(6):583–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Wang HH, Zhu F. Theoretical analysis on thermal pyrolysis of major compositions in tree leaves. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2012;48(11):99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  34. EL-Geassy AA. Reduction of CaO and/or MgO-doped Fe2O3 compacts with carbon monoxide at 1173-1473 K. ISIJ International. 1996. 36 (11): 1344-53.

  35. EL-Geassy AA. Gaseous reduction of MgO-doped Fe2O3 compacts with carbon monoxide at 1173-1473 K. ISIJ International. 1996. 36 (11): 1328-37.

  36. Nasr MI, Omar AA, Khedr MH. EI-Geassy AA. Effect of nickel oxide doping on the kinetics and mechanism of iron oxide reduction. ISIJ Int. 1995;35(9):1043–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hessein M, Kashawaya Y, Ishi K, et al. Sintering and heating reduction processes of alumina containing iron ore samples. Ironmaking Steelmaking. 2008;35(3):191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Coats AW, Redfern JP. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature. 1964;201(1):68–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li C, Suzuki K. Kinetic analyses of biomass tar pyrolysis using the distributed activation energy model by TG/DTA technique. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;98(1):261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supposed by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (51274066, 51304048), The National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China (No. 2015M571322), The National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2013BAA03B03), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N130402019) and The Open-ended Funds for Yunnan province (CNMRCUKF1408).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingbo Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zuo, Z., Yu, Q., Wei, M. et al. Thermogravimetric study of the reduction of copper slag by biomass. J Therm Anal Calorim 126, 481–491 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5570-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5570-z

Keywords

Navigation