Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Forgotten Rural Landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions between nature and man – the underlying forces in landscape – have over time caused diversity. Usually, geographers and landscape ecologists deal with spatial diversity; in this paper, we would like to also consider temporal diversity. We argue that Central and Eastern European landscapes (using the examples of Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia) are much more diverse in time (layers) than Western European ones. This difference requires the use of different indicators in order to measure and study landscapes and special problems, threats, and possibilities of management and future development – but most important is the consideration of different perceptions. We also show that this diversity reduces the readability of landscapes, creating miscommunication and a transformation of meanings. We further argue that the link between humans and landscape is lost in Central and Eastern European countries due to temporal diversity, and that this link will be created anew in a globalizing world. To overcome alienation, we need slightly different classifications/typologies for each country in this region, with the aim of a sound future management of cultural landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. Alumäe A. Printsmann H. Palang (2003) Cultural and historical values in landscape planning: locals’ perception H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes Kluwer Boston 124–145

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Antrop (2000) ArticleTitleBackground concepts for integrated landscape analysis Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 77 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Antrop (2004) ArticleTitleLandscape change and the urbanization process in Europe Landscape Urban Plan. 67 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Antrop V. Eetvelde ParticleVan (2000) ArticleTitleHolistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics Landscape Urban Plan. 50 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Bastian U. Steinhardt (Eds) (2003) Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology Kluwer Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • BelGEO 2004. Special issue on European Landscapes.

  • S.C. Bourassa (1991) The Aesthetics of Landscape Belhaven Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bourdieu (1977) Outline of Theory of Practice Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Buraczynski (1997) Roztocze. Structure – Relief – Landscape ZGR UMCS Lublin

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Chalupczak T. Browarek (1998) National Minorities in Poland 1918–1995 UMCS Press Lublin

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Claval (2005) ArticleTitleThe language of the rural landscape Landscape. Urban Plan. 70 9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Cosgrove (1984) Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape University of Wisconsin Press Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • D.E. Cosgrove (2003) Landscape: Ecology and Semiosis H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes Kluwer Boston 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Crang (1998) Cultural Geography Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Duncan (1994) ArticleTitleThe politics of landscape and nature1992–93 Progr. Human Geogr. 18 361–370

    Google Scholar 

  • J.S. Duncan (1995) ArticleTitleLandscape geography, 1993–94 Progr. Human Geogr. 19 414–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Espersen S. 1999. The farmer as a steward of the cultural landscape. In: Setten G., Semb T. and Torvik R. (eds.) Shaping the LandThe Future of the PastVol. 3. Proceedings of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape18th Session in Røros and TrondheimSeptember 7–11, 1998, pp. 596–605.

  • M. Gabrovec D. Kladnik (1997) ArticleTitleSome new aspects of land use in Slovenia Geografski zbornik 37 7–64

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gustavsson A. Peterson (2003) Authenticity in landscape conservation and management: the importance of the local context H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes Kluwer Boston 319–356

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Ingold (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jones (1991) ArticleTitleThe elusive reality of landscape. Concepts and approaches in landscape research Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 45 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jones (2003) The concept of cultural landscape – discourse and narratives H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes Kluwer Boston 21–52

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Keisteri (1990) ArticleTitleThe study of changes in cultural landscapes Fennia 168 31–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Konkolyné Gyuró É. 2000. Tájszerkezet vizsgálat. In: Márkus (et al) (eds.). A FHNPark földrajzi információs rendszerének kifejlesztése. Phare projekt/OSS No. ZZ9524 0106 L001/. University of Western Hungary, Sopron.

  • Konkolyné Gyuró É. 2002. Tájkaraktert formáló történelem. Geographical History of Transdanubien, Paper presented on the conference: Proceedings in press.

  • D. Lowenthal (1985) Past is a Foreign Country University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lowenthal (1997) European landscape transformations: the rural residue P. Groth T.W. Bressi (Eds) Understanding Ordinary Landscapes Yale University Press New Haven 180–188

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lowenthal (1999) ArticleTitleFrom landscapes of the future to landscapes of the past Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 53 139–144 Occurrence Handle10.1080/00291959950136858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luginbühl Y. and Pedroli B. this issue. The social demand of landscapea notion of material and immaterial nature. Landscape Ecology.

  • D.J. Marcucci (2000) ArticleTitleLandscape history as a planning tool Landscape Urban Plan. 49 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Massey (2001) ArticleTitleTalking of space–time Trans. Inst. Brit. Geogr. 26 257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Mitchell (2003) ArticleTitleCultural landscapes: just landscapes or landscapes of justice? Progr. Human Geogr. 27 787–796

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Morris N. Evans (2004) ArticleTitleAgricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect J. Rural Stud. 20 95–111 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00041-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z. Naveh A.S. Lieberman (1994) Landscape Ecology Theory and Applications EditionNumber2 Springer-Verlag New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Olwig (2002) LandscapeNature and the Body Politic: From Britain's Renaissance to America's New World University of Wisconsin Press Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Palang H. Alumäe Ü. Mander (2000) ArticleTitleHolistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach Landscape Urban Plan. 50 85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H. and Paal P. 2002. Loodud ja kaotatud paigad/Places Gained and Lost. Rahvusvaheline seminar “Koht ja Paik II” – Kultuur ja maastik. Tallinn, pp. 51–52.

  • Pinto Correia T., Gustavsson R. and Pirnat J. this issue. Bridging the gap towards more sensitive and creative landscape approaches across various levels of decisions. Landscape Ecol.

  • I. Rejec Brancelj (1998) Kras D. Perko M. OroženAdamič (Eds) Slovenija: Pokrajine n Ljudje Mladinska knjiga Ljubljana 234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph E. [1976] 1986. Place and Placelessness. Pion, London.

  • C.O. Sauer (1925) ArticleTitleThe morphology of landscape Univ. Calif. Publ. Geogr. 2 19–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama S. 1995. Landscape and Memory. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

  • Skowronek E. 1999. Anthropogenic transformations of the Roztocze landscape as exemplified by the Biala Lada and Upper Wieprz Drainage Basins. Doctoral Dissertation, Biblioteka GlownaUMCS, Lublin.

  • E. Skowronek R. Krukowska A. Swieca (2003) Transformations of cultural landscape. The case of the Polish–Ukrainian Borderland H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces. Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes Kluwer Boston 71–90

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Soini (2004) Between insideness and outsideness: studying locals’ perceptions of landscape H. Palang H. Sooväli M. Antrop G. Setten (Eds) Rural Landscapes: Past Processes and Future Strategies Kluwer Boston 83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sooväli H., Palang H., Alumäe H., Külvik M., Kaur E., Oja T., Prede M. and Pae T. 2003a. (Traditional) Landscape identity – globalized, abandoned, sustained?. In: Tiezzi E., Brebbia C.A. and Usó J.L. (eds), Ecosystems and Sustainable Development, Vol. 2 (Advances in Ecological Sciences, 19). WIT Press, pp. 925–935.

  • Sooväli H., Semm K. and Palang H. 2003b. Coping with Landscapes the Setu and the Saaremaa PeopleEstonia. Presentation held in the conference Landscape Law and JusticeOslo15–19 June2003.

  • Swaffield S. and Primdahl J. this issue. Global Driving Forces And Local Landscapes-Development Patterns, Analytical Concepts And Policy Implications. Landscape Ecology.

  • Town Index for the Polish Republic 1924. Lublin Voivodship, Vol. 4. GUS, Warsaw.

  • Town Index for the Polish Republic 1924. Lviv Voivodship, Vol. 13. GUS, Warsaw.

  • Urbanc M. 2002a. Cultural Landscapes in Slovenia (Kulturne pokrajine v Sloveniji). ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana.

  • Urbanc M. 2002b. Poskus tipologije kulturnih pokrajin v Sloveniji. Oddelek za geografijo Filozofske fakultete Univerze v LjubljaniLjubljani.

  • Valk H. 1996. Aegadest ja ajatunnetusest Setomaal. In: Valk H. and Västrik E. (eds.) Palvevanapatt ja pihlakas. Setomaa. Vanavaravedaja 4. Setomaa 1994. a. kogumisretke tulemusiTartu.

  • M. Widgren (2004) Can Landscapes be Read? H. Palang H. Sooväli M. Antrop G. Setten (Eds) Rural Landscapes: Past Processes and Future Strategies Kluwer Boston 455–466

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia

    Hannes Palang & Anu Printsmann

  2. University of Western Hungary, Sopron, Hungary

    Éva Konkoly Gyuró

  3. Anton Melik Geographical Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Mimi Urbanc

  4. Marie Curie Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland

    Ewa Skowronek & Witold Woloszyn

  5. Institute of Ecology, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5, 10120, Tallinn, Estonia

    Hannes Palang

Authors
  1. Hannes Palang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anu Printsmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Éva Konkoly Gyuró
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mimi Urbanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ewa Skowronek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Witold Woloszyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Palang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Gyuró, É.K. et al. The Forgotten Rural Landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol 21, 347–357 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x

Key words

Search

Navigation