Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying determinants contributing to plant species richness in mosaic landscapes: a single- and multi-patch perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite good theoretical knowledge about determinants of plant species richness in mosaic landscapes, validations based on complete surveys are scarce. We conducted a case study in a highly fragmented, traditional agricultural landscape. In 199 patches of 20 representative multi-patch-plots (MPPs, 1 ha) we recorded a total of 371 plant species. In addition to an additive partitioning of species diversity at the (a) patch- and (b) MPP-scale, we adopted the recently proposed ‘specificity’ measure to quantify the contribution of a spatial subunit to landscape species richness (subunit-to-landscape-contribution, SLC). SLC-values were calculated at both scales with respect to various spatial extents. General regression models were used to quantify the relative importance of hypothesis-driven determinants for species richness and SLC-values.

At the patch scale, habitat type was the main determinant of species richness, followed by area and elongated shape. For SLC-values, area was more important than habitat type, and its relevance increased with the extent of the considered landscape. Influences of elongated shape and vegetation context were minor. Differences between habitat types were pronounced for species richness and also partly scale-dependent for SLC-values.

Relevant predictors at the MPP-scale were nonlinear habitat richness, the gradient from anthropogenic to seminatural vegetation, and the proportions of natural vegetation and rare habitats. Linear elements and habitat configuration did not contribute to species richness and SLC. Results at the MPP-scale were in complete accordance with the predictions of the mosaic concept. Hence, our study represents its first empirical validation for plant species diversity in mosaic landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alard D, Poudevigne I (2000) Diversity patterns in grasslands along a landscape gradient in northwestern France. J Vegetat Sci 11:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (1975) Components of diversity. Oecologia 18:359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Burel F, Thenail C, Le Coeur D (2000) A holistic landscape ecological study of the interactions between farming activities and ecological patterns in Brittany, France. Landscape Urban Plan 50:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt B, Hermy M (2004) Species turnover at small scales in dune stack plant communities. Basic Appl Ecol 5:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brose U (2001) Relative importance of isolation, area and habitat heterogeneity for vascular plant species richness of temporary wetlands in east-German farmland. Ecography 24:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH (2000) Patterns of species richness in dry grassland patches in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 23:641–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun HH (2001) Determinants of species richness in patches of grassland and heathland in Himmerland (Denmark). Nordic J Bot 21:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Baudry J, Butet A, Clergeau P, Delettre Y, Le Coeur D, Dubs F, Morvan N, Paillat G, Petit S, Thenail C, Brunel E, Lefeuvre JC (1998) Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecol-Int J Ecol 19:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. Am Natural 113:791–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, Veech JA, Gering JC, Summerville KS (2003) Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. Am Natural 162:734–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauber J, Hirsch M, Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A, Wolters V (2003) Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JC (1986) Statistics and data analysis in geology. Wiley & Sons, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P (1992) Mosaikkonzept und Inseltheorie in der Kulturlandschaft. Verhandlungen Gesellschaft Ökol 21:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Die Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson A, Eriksson O, Berglund H (1995) Species abundance patterns of plants in Swedish seminatural pastures. Ecography 18:310–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2005) When is a landscape perspective important. In: Wiens JA, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank LG (2005) Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Ann Appl Biol 146:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman E, Betrus CJ, Blair RB (2003) Effects of spatial scale and taxonomic group on partitioning of butterfly and bird diversity in the Great Basin. USA Landscape Ecol 18:675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2002) Foreword. In: Gutzwiller K (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, NY, USA, pp vii–x

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO (2002) The alpha–beta-regional relationship: providing new insights into local-regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components. Ecol Lett 5:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 17:488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerowitt B, Bertke E, Hespelt SK, Tute C (2003) Towards multifunctional agriculture—weeds as ecological goods? Weed Res 43:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (1982) Geometry and spatial interaction. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 72:332–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ (ed) (2002) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gyllenberg M (1997) Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science 275:397–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Angelstam P (1991) Landscape ecology as a theoretical basis for nature conservation. Landscape Ecol 5:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietala-Koivu R, Jarvenpaa T, Helenius J (2004) Value of semi-natural areas as biodiversity indicators in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietel E, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2004) Analysing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany. Landscape Ecol 19:473–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hietel E, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2005) Linking socio-economic factors, environment and land cover in the German Highlands, 1945–1999. J Environ Manage 75:133–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Kroll R, Schafer D, Seibel S (2003) Landscape indicators from ecological area sampling in Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1994) Biological diversity—the coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret P, Schupbach B, Luka H (2003) Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ (2005) Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements. J Veget Sci 16:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis—a practical approach. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1997) Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: implications for reserve design. Biol Conserv 82:369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Coeur D, Baudry J, Burel F, Thenail C (2002) Why and how we should study field boundary biodiversity in an agrarian landscape context. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evolution Biol 6:381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Taylor WW (2002) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2000) Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity. Ecol Lett 3:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma MH, Tarmi S, Helenius J (2002) Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finnland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall EJR, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD—multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach Oregon USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351 US Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USA, pp 1–122

  • Neßhöver C (1999) Charakterisierung der Vegetationsdiversität eines Landschaftsausschnittes durch funktionelle Attribute von Pflanzen – Ein Beispiel aus der Nördlichen Frankenalb. Bayreuther Forum ökol 69:1–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega M, Elena-Rosello R, Del Barrio JMG (2004) Estimation of plant diversity at landscape level: a methodological approach applied to three Spanish rural areas. Environ Monitor Assess 95:97–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterseil J, Wrbka T, Plutzar C, Schmitzberger I, Kiss A, Szerencsits E, Reiter K, Schneider W, Suppan F, Beissmann H (2004) Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes—the SINUS approach. Land Use Policy 21:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts MD, Plotkin JB, Lee HS, Manokaran N, Ashton PS, Bossert WH (2001) Sampling biodiversity: effects of plot shape. Malaysian Forest: 29–34

  • Preston WF (1960) Time and space and the variation of species. Ecology 41:611–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retzer V (1999) Charakterisierung und Vergleich der Vegetationsdiversität zweier Kulturlandschaften—Untersuchungen anhand systematischer Rastermethoden in Frankenalb und Fichtelgebirge—Eine Methodenkritik. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie 69:117–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2003) Additive partition of parametric information and its associated beta-diversity measure. Acta Biotheoret 51:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor-analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol 10:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschewitz I, Gabriel D, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2005) The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J Appl Ecol 42:873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM (2003) Six types of species–area curves. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM (2004) A melange of curves—further dialogue about species–area relationships. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A (2001) Syndynamics and ecology of Scotch Broom stands in the Lahn-Dill-Highlands (Germany). Tuexenia 21:51–89

    Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft Inc. (2001) STATISTICA for Windows. www.statsoft.com.—Statsoft Inc

  • Steiner NC, Köhler W (2003) Effects of landscape patterns on species richness—a modelling approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens J (2002) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Erlbaum Assoc, Mahwah, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, de Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manage 63:337–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ, Falkner MB, Schell LD (1995) A modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method. Vegetatio 117:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD (1997) Rapid assessment of plant diversity patterns: a methodology for landscapes. Environ Monitor Assess 48:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey M (2000) Natural areas, the whole countryside approach and sustainable agriculture. Land Use Policy 17:279–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjørve E (2002) Habitat size and number in multi-habitat landscapes: a model approach based on species–area curves. Ecography 25:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantis KA, Mylonas M, Lika K, Vardinoyannis K (2003) A model for the species–area–habitat relationship. J Biogeogr 30:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veech JA, Summerville KS, Crist TO and Gering JC (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H, Wildi O, Ewald K (2000) Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 15:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner HH, Edwards PJ (2001) Quantifying habitat specificity to assess the contribution of a patch to species richness at a landscape scale. Landscape Ecol 16:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldhardt R, Simmering D, Otte A (2004) Estimation and prediction of plant species richness in a mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 19:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber D, Hintermann U, Zangger A (2004) Scale and trends in species richness: considerations for monitoring biological diversity for political purposes. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2005) Towards a unified landscape ecology. In: Wiens JA, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 365–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, Institute of Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Biosystems, Land Use and Nutrition, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, Giessen, D-35392, Germany

    Dietmar Simmering, Rainer Waldhardt & Annette Otte

Authors
  1. Dietmar Simmering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Waldhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annette Otte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar Simmering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmering, D., Waldhardt, R. & Otte, A. Quantifying determinants contributing to plant species richness in mosaic landscapes: a single- and multi-patch perspective. Landscape Ecol 21, 1233–1251 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0027-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-0027-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation