Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications

  • Review
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agent-based modelling is an approach that has been receiving attention by the land use modelling community in recent years, mainly because it offers a way of incorporating the influence of human decision-making on land use in a mechanistic, formal, and spatially explicit way, taking into account social interaction, adaptation, and decision-making at different levels. Specific advantages of agent-based models include their ability to model individual decision-making entities and their interactions, to incorporate social processes and non-monetary influences on decision-making, and to dynamically link social and environmental processes. A number of such models are now beginning to appear—it is timely, therefore, to review the uses to which agent-based land use models have been put so far, and to discuss some of the relevant lessons learnt, also drawing on those from other areas of simulation modelling, in relation to future applications. In this paper, we review applications of agent-based land use models under the headings of (a) policy analysis and planning, (b) participatory modelling, (c) explaining spatial patterns of land use or settlement, (d) testing social science concepts and (e) explaining land use functions. The greatest use of such models so far has been by the research community as tools for organising knowledge from empirical studies, and for exploring theoretical aspects of particular systems. However, there is a need to demonstrate that such models are able to solve problems in the real world better than traditional modelling approaches. It is concluded that in terms of decision support, agent-based land-use models are probably more useful as research tools to develop an underlying knowledge base which can then be developed together with end-users into simple rules-of-thumb, rather than as operational decision support tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An L, Linderman M, Qi J, Shortridge A, Liu J (2005) Exploring complexity in a human-environment system: an agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 95(1):54–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R (1997) The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton studies in complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 232 pp

  • Balmann A (1997) Farm-based modelling of a regional structural change: a cellular automata approach. Eur Rev Agric Econ 24:85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmann A, Happe K, Kellermann K, Kleingarn A (2002) Adjustment costs of agri-environment policy switchings: an agent-based analysis of the German region Hohenlohe. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 127–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreteau O, Bousquet F (2000) SHADOC: a multi-agent model to tackle viability of irrigated systems. Ann Oper Res 94:139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreteau O, Bousquet F, Attonaty J-M (2001) Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(2):http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/5.html

  • Becu N, Perez P, Walker A, Barreteau O, Page CL (2003) Agent based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand—description of the CATCHSCAPE model. Ecol Model 170(2–3):319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger T (2001) Agent-based spatial models applied to agriculture: a simulation tool for technology diffusion, resource use changes and policy analysis. Agric Econ 25:245–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger T, Ringler C (2002) Trade-offs, efficiency gains, and technical change: modelling water management and land use within a multiple-agent framework. Q J Int Agric 41(1/2):119–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Boero R, Squazzoni F (2005) Does empirical embeddedness matter? Methodological issues on agent-based models for analytical social science. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 8(4):6 [online at: http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/6.html]

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissau S, Anh HL, Castella JC (2004) The SAMBA role play game in northern Vietnam: an innovative approach to participatory natural resource management. Mt Res Dev 24(2):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet F, Barreteau O, d’Aquino P, Etienne M, Boissau S, Aubert S, Le Page C, Babin D, Castella J-C (2002) Multi-agent systems and role games: collective learning processes for ecosystem management. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 248–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet F, Le Page C (2004) Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecol Model 176:313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Page SE, Riolo R, Rand W (2004) Agent-based and analytical modelling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environ Model Softw 19:1097–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Cottingham KL (2002) Resilience and the restoration of lakes. In: Gunderson LH, Pritchard L Jr (eds) Resilience and the behavior of large scale ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 51–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Castella JC, Trung TN, Boissau S (2005) Participatory simulation of land-use changes in the northern mountains of Vietnam: the combined use of an agent-based model, a role-playing game, and a geographic information system. Ecol Soc 10(1):27 [online at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art27/]

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Aquino P, Le Page C, Bousquet F, Bah A (2003) Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: the SelfCormas experiment in Senegal. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6(3):5 [online at http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/5.html]

    Google Scholar 

  • Deadman P, Robinson D, Moran E, Brondizio E (2004) Colonist household decisionmaking and land-use change in the Amazon Rainforest: an agent-based simulation. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 31(5):693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean JS, Gumerman GJ, Epstein JM, Axtell RL, Swedlund AC, Parket MT, McCarroll S (2000) Understanding Anasazi cultural change through agent-based modelling. In: Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (eds) Dynamics in human and primate studies: agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 179–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant G, Huet S, Bousset JP, Henriot J, Amon G, Weisbuch G (2002) Agent-based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier département. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 158–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein JM, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Etienne M, Le Page C, Cohen M (2003) A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6(2):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans TP, Kelley H (2004) Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. J Environ Manage 72:57–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber J (1999) Multi-agent systems: an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley Longman, Harlow, UK, 509 pp

  • Gotts NM, Polhill JG, Law ANR (2003a) Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas. Artif Intell Rev 19:3–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotts NM, Polhill JG, Law ANR (2003b) Aspiration levels in a land use simulation. Cybern Syst 34(8):663–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm V, Wyszomirski T, Aikman D, Uchmanski J (1999) Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop. Ecol Model 115:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happe K (2004) Agricultural policies and farm structures: agent-based modelling and application to EU policy reform (Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Central and Eastern Europe, vol 30). Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (IAMO), Halle, Germany, 291 pp

  • Hare M, Deadman P (2004) Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models in environmental management. Math Comput Simul 64:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann M, Kelley H, Evans T (2002) Simulating land-cover change in South-Central Indiana: an agent-based model of deforestation and afforestation. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 218–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Huigen MGA (2004) First principles of the MameLuke multi-actor modelling framework for land use change, illustrated with a Philippine case study. J Environ Manage 72:5–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huston M, DeAngelis D, Post W (1988) New computer models unify ecological theory. Bioscience 38:682–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo L, Gotts NM, Polhill JG (2004) Case based reasoning, social dilemmas, and a new equilibrium concept. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 7(3):1 [online at: http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/1.html]

    Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo LR, Gotts NM, Polhill JG (2003) FEARLUS-W: an agent-based model of river basin land use and water management. In: Dijst M, Schot P, de Jong K (eds) Framing land use dynamics: integrating knowledge on spatial dynamics in socio-economic and environmental systems for spatial planning in western urbanized countries. Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp 163–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MA (2001) An exploratory integrated model to assess management of lake eutrophication. Ecol Model 140:111–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MA, Walker BH, Langridge J, Abel N (2000) An adaptive agent model for analysing co-evolution of management and policies in a complex rangeland system. Ecol Model 131:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (2000) Dynamics in human and primate societies: agent-based modelling of social and spatial processes. Sante Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 398 pp

  • Kohler TA, Kresl J, West CV, Carr E, Wilshusen RH (2000) Be there then: a modelling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral populations of the Mesa Verde region, US Southwest. In: Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (eds) Dynamics in human and primate studies: agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, pp 145–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing JS, Kremer JN (1993) Emergent properties of Balinese water temple networks: coadaptation on a rugged fitness landscape. Am Anthropol 95:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert R (2002) Agent-based modeling as organizational and public policy simulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7195–7196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ligtenberg A, Wachowicz M, Bregt AK, Beulens A, Kettenis DL (2004) A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. J Environ Manage 72:43–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loibl W, Toetzer T (2003) Modeling growth and densification processes in suburban regions—simulation of landscape transition with spatial agents. Environ Model Softw 18(6):553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynam T (2002) Scientific measurements and villagers’ knowledge: an integrative multi-agent model from the semi-arid areas of Zimbabwe. In: Janssen M (ed) Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 188–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson SM (2004) The SYPR integrative assessment model: complexity in development. In: Turner BL, Geoghegan J, Foster DR (eds) Integrated land-change science and tropical deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: final frontiers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson SM (2005a) Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land change in the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region of Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 111(1–4):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson SM (2005b) Land use in the southern Yucatan peninsular region of Mexico: scenarios of population and institutional change. Comput Environ Urban Syst 30(3):230–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R, Selman P (2006) Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agric Econ 57(2):199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RB (2006) The People and Landscape Model (PALM): towards full integration of human decision-making and biophysical simulation models. Ecol Model 194(4):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RB, Pilbeam CJ (2005) Modelling the long-term sustainability of maize/millet cropping systems in the mid-hills of Nepal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 111(1–4):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RB, Stephens W (eds) (2002) Crop-soil simulation models: applications in developing countries. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 277 pp

  • McCown RL (2002a) Changing systems for supporting farmers’ decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects. Agric Syst 74:179–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCown RL (2002b) Locating agricultural decision support systems in the troubled past and socio-technical complexity of ‘models for management’. Agric Syst 74:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Gulland EJ, Kerven C, Behnke R, Wright IA, Smailov A (2006) A multi-agent system model of pastoralist behaviour in Kazakhstan. Ecol Complexity 3:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möhring M, Troitzsch KG (2001) Lake Anderson revisited by agents. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(3):1 [online at: http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/3/1.html]

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss S, Pahl-Wostl C, Downing T (2001) Agent-based integrated assessment modelling: the example of climate change. Integr Assess 2:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter HS, van der Veen A, de Vriend HJ (2001) ABLOoM: location behaviour, spatial patterns, and agent-based modelling. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(4):2 (Online at: http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/4/2.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker DC, Manson SM, Janssen MA, Hoffmann MJ, Deadman P (2002) Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93(2):316–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker DC, Meretsky V (2004) Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polhill JG, Gotts NM, Law ANR (2001) Imitative versus non-imitative strategies in a land use simulation. Cybern Syst 32(1–2):285–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu R, Haggith M, Mudavanhu H, Muetzelfeldt R, Standa-Gunda W (2003) ZimFlores: a model to advise co-management of the Mafungautsi Forest in Zimbabwe. Small-scale For Econ Manage Policy 2(2):185–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan KS, Shibasaki R (2001) A GIS based integrated land use/cover change model to study agricultural and urban land use changes. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Asian conference on remote sensing. Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing, and Processing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 5–9 November 2001

  • Ramanath AM, Gilbert N (2004) The design of participatory agent-based social simulations. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 7(4):1 [online] URL: http://www.jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/4/1.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders L, Pumain D, Mathian H, Guérin-Pace F, Bura S (1997) SIMPOP—a multi-agent system for the study of urbanism. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 24:287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18(12):648–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta R, Lant C, Kraft S, Beaulieu J, Peterson W, Loftus T (2005) Modeling enrollment in the conservation reserve program by using agents within spatial decision support systems: an example from southern Illinois. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32(6):821–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair TR, Seligman NaG (1996) Crop modelling: from infancy to maturity. Agron J 88(5):698–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens W, Middleton T (2002) Why has the uptake of decision-support systems been so poor? In: Matthews RB, Stephens W (eds) Crop-soil simulation models: applications in developing countries. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 129–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrens P (2002) SprawlSim: modelling sprawling urban growth using automata-based models. In: Parker DC, Berger T, Manson SM (eds) Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change: report and review of an international workshop, LUCC Focus 1 Office, Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change, Indiana University, Indiana, pp 72–78, 4–7 October 2001

  • Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modelling: a systems dynamic approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington, DC, 339 pp

  • Vanclay JK, Haggith M, Colfer C (2003) Participation and model building: lessons learned from the Bukittinggi workshop. Small-scale For Econ Manage Policy 2(2):135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Verburg PH (2006) Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landsc Ecol 21:1171–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch G (2000) Environment and institutions: a complex dynamical systems approach. Ecol Econ 34:381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch G, Boudjema G (1999) Dynamical aspects in the adoption of agri-environmental measures. Adv Complex Syst 2:11–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17(4):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support for this work under Development Activity RES-224-25-0102 of the Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) Programme, jointly funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin B. Matthews.

Additional information

This paper arises from research conducted as part of the UK Research Councils’ RELU Programme (award number RES-224-25-0102). RELU is funded jointly by the Economic and Social Research Council, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council, with additional funding from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, R.B., Gilbert, N.G., Roach, A. et al. Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landscape Ecol 22, 1447–1459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1

Keywords

Navigation