Abstract
Transition matrices have often been used in landscape ecology and GIS studies of land-use to quantitatively estimate the rate of change. When transition matrices for different observation periods are compared, the observation intervals often differ because satellite images or photographs of the research site taken at constant time intervals may not be available. If the observation intervals differ, the transition probabilities cannot be compared without calculating a transition matrix with the normalized observation interval. For such calculation, several previous studies have utilized a linear algebra formula of the power root of matrices. However, three difficulties may arise when applying this formula to a practical dataset from photographs of a research site. We examined the first difficulty, namely that plural solutions could exist for a yearly transition matrix, which implies that there could be multiple scenarios for the same transition in land-use change. Using data for the Abukuma Mountains in Japan and the Selva el Ocote Biosphere Reserve in Mexico, we then looked at the second difficulty, in which we may obtain no positive Markovian matrix and only a matrix partially consisting of negative numbers. We propose a way to calibrate a matrix with some negative transition elements and to estimate the prediction error. Finally, we discuss the third difficulty that arises when a new land-use category appears at the end of the observation period and how to solve it. We developed a computer program to calculate and calibrate the yearly matrices and to estimate the prediction error.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker WL (1989a) Landscape ecology and nature reserve design in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. Ecology 70:23–35
Baker WL (1989b) A review of models of landscape change. Landscape Ecol 2:111–133
Braimoh AK (2006) Random and systematic land-cover transitions in Northern Ghana. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113(1–4):254–263
Braimoh AK, Vlek PLG (2004) Land-cover dynamics in an urban area of Ghana. Earth Interact 8:1–15
Cinlar E (1975) Introduction to stochastic processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Ehlers M, Jadkowski MA, Howard RR et al (1990) Application of SPOT data for regional growth analysis and local planning. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 56:175–180
Flamenco-Sandoval A, Ramos MM, Masera OR (2007) Assessing implications of land-use and land-cover change dynamics for conservation of a highly diverse tropical rain forest. Biol Conserv 138:131–145
Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O’Neill RV (1987) Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1:19–28
Gustafson EJ, Parker GR (1992) Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecol 7(2):101–110
Hathout S (2002) The use of GIS for monitoring and predicting urban growth in East and West St. Paul, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Can J Environ Manag 66:229–238
Kachi N, Yasuoka Y, Totsuka T et al (1986) A stochastic model for describing re-vegetation following forest cutting—an application of remote sensing. Ecol Model 32:105–117
Lambin EF, Geist HJ (2006) Land-use and land-cover change. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Lewis HG, Brown M (2001) A generalized confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sensing 22(16):3223–3235
Lipschutz S (1979) Probabilities, course et problems. Série Schaum, McGraw-Hill, Paris
Lo CP, Yang X (2002) Drivers of land-use/land-cover changes and dynamic modeling for the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 68(10):1073–1082
Mertens B, Lambin E (2000) Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Ann Ass Am Geogr 90(3):467–494
Messerli B (1997) Geography in a rapidly changing world. Int Geogr Bull 47:65–75
Meyer WB, Turner BL II (1991) Changes in land use and land cover: a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mundia CN, Aniya M (2005) Analysis of land use/cover changes and urban expansion of Nairobi City using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Remote Sensing 26:2831–2849
Petit C, Scudder T, Lambin E (2001) Quantifying processes of land-cover change by remote sensing: resettlement and rapid land-cover changes in south-eastern Zambia. Int J Remote Sensing 22:3435–3456
Pontius RG Jr (2002) Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 68(10):1041–1049
Pontius RG Jr, Cheuk ML (2006) A generalized cross-tabulation matrix to compare soft-classified maps at multiple resolutions. Int J Geogr Info Sci 20(1):1–30
Pontius RG Jr, Shusas E, McEachern M (2004) Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101(2–3):251–268
Turner MG (1990) Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol 4(1):21–30
Turner MG, Dale VH, Gardner RH (1989) Predicting across scales: theory development and testing. Landscape Ecol 3(3/4):245–252
Turner BL II, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS 104:2066–2071
Usher MB (1981) Modeling ecological succession, with particular reference to Markovian models. Vegetatio 46–7:11–18
Acknowledgments
We express our sincere thanks to Masahiro Ichikawa, Takashi Kohyama, Toru Nakashizuka, and Ken-Ichi Akao for their helpful suggestions. Prof. Ichikawa encouraged us to continue this study. Profs. Kohyama and Nakashizuka provided the opportunity to solve the mechanism of the dynamics of land use. Prof. Akao provided mathematical advice at an early stage of our study. This research was funded in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Scientific Research (nos. A-21247006, B-20370006 and B-21310152) and project 2–2 “Sustainability and Biodiversity Assessment on Forest Utilization Options” and D-04 of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takada, T., Miyamoto, A. & Hasegawa, S.F. Derivation of a yearly transition probability matrix for land-use dynamics and its applications. Landscape Ecol 25, 561–572 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9433-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9433-x