Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge of how habitat heterogeneity affects dispersal is critical for conserving connectivity in current and changing landscapes. However, we generally lack an understanding of how dispersal costs and animal movements vary among crops characteristic of agroecosystems. We hypothesized that a physiological constraint, desiccation risk, influences movement behavior among crops and other matrix habitats (corn, soybean, forest, prairie) in Ambystoma tigrinum (tiger salamander) in Illinois, USA. In a desiccation experiment, salamanders were added to enclosures in four replicate plots of each matrix habitat, and water loss was measured every 12 h for 48 h. Changes in water loss were examined using a linear mixed model. Water loss varied among treatments, over time, and there was a significant treatment-time interaction. Water loss was greater in corn and prairie than in forest and soybean. To assess whether salamanders move through matrix habitats that minimize desiccation, we tracked movements of individuals released on edges between habitats for two treatment combinations: soybean–corn, and soybean–prairie. As predicted based on our desiccation experiment, movements were oriented towards soybean in both cases. Thus, variation in desiccation risk among matrix habitats likely influenced movement decisions by salamanders, although other factors such as predation risk could have contributed to habitat choice. We argue that conceptualizing dispersal cost as uniformly high in all crop types is too simplistic. Estimating crop-specific dispersal costs and movement patterns may be necessary for constructing effective measures of landscape connectivity in agroecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modeling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plann 64:233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baguette M, Van Dyck H (2007) Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecol 22:1117–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, Majka DR, Newell SL (2009) Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. Ecol Appl 19:2067–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan-McLeod ACA (2003) Factors affecting the permeability of clearcuts to red-legged frogs. J Wildlife Manage 67:663–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charney ND, Letcher BH, Haro A, Warren PS (2009) Terrestrial passive integrated transponder antennae for tracking small animal movements. J Wildlife Manage 73:1245–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church DR, Bailey LL, Wilbur HM, Kendall WL, Hines JE (2007) Iteroparity in the variable environment of the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum. Ecology 88:891–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) (2001) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton BW, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Gamble LR (2007) A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conserv Biol 21:788–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentz EJ (2007) Medicine and surgery of amphibians. ILAR J 48:255–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeter GJ, Rothermel BB, Whitfield Gibbons J (2008) Habitat selection and movement of pond-breeding amphibians in experimentally fragmented pine forests. J Wildlife Manage 72:473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Taylor AD (1997) Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Janin A, Léna J-P, Ray N, Delacourt C, Allemand P, Joly P (2009) Assessing landscape connectivity with calibrated cost-distance modelling: predicting common toad distribution in a context of spreading agriculture. J Appl Ecol 46:833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magle SB, Theobald DM, Crooks KR (2009) A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecol 24:267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ, Desrochers A (2005) Landscape resistance to frog movements. Can J Zool 83:455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ, Vos CC (2006) Choosing the safest route: frog orientation in an agricultural landscape. J Herpetol 40:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips CA (1989) Breeding pond fidelity, population structure, and phylogeography in the spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum. Dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis

  • Pough FH, Wilson RE (1970) Natural daily temperature stress, dehydration, and acclimation in juvenile Ambystoma maculatum (Shaw) (Amphibia: Caudata). Physiol Zool 43:194–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Preest MR, Pough FH (1989) Interaction of temperature and hydration on locomotion of toads. Funct Ecol 3:693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:20770–20775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rayfield B, Fortin M, Fall A (2010) The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values. Landscape Ecol 25:519–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD (2006) Grasslands as movement barriers for a forest-associated salamander: migration behavior of adult and juvenile salamanders at a distinct habitat edge. Biol Conserv 131:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Harper EB, Rehard LR, Semlitsch RD (2008) The role of microhabitats in the desiccation and survival of anurans in recently harvested oak-hickory forest. Copeia 2008:807–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD, Thompson FR III (2009) Survival costs associated with wood frog breeding migrations: effects of timber harvest and drought. Ecology 90:1620–1630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizkalla CE, Swihart RK (2007) Explaining movement decisions of forest rodents in fragmented landscapes. Biol Conserv 140:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohr JR, Madison DM (2003) Dryness increases predation risk in efts: support for an amphibian decline hypothesis. Oecologia 135:657–664

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel BB, Luhring TM (2005) Burrow availability and desiccation risk of mole salamanders (Ambystoma talpoideum) in harvested versus unharvested forest stands. J Herpetol 39:619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermel BB, Semlitsch RD (2002) An experimental investigation of landscape resistance of forest versus old-field habitats to emigrating juvenile amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:1324–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saumure RA, Herman TB, Titman RD (2007) Effects of haying and agricultural practices on a declining species: the North American wood turtle, Glyptemys insculpta. Biol Conserv 135:565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schadt S, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Trepl L (2002) Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx. Ecol Appl 12:1469–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Wiens JA (2005) Spatial ecology of cactus bugs: area constraints and patch connectivity. Ecology 86:1627–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (2008) Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manage 72:260–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsch U (1990) Migration and orientation in anuran amphibians. Ethol Ecol Evol 2:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens VM, Polus E, Wesselingh RA, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Landscape Ecol 19:829–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens VM, Leboulengé É, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M (2006) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Oecologia 150:161–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NASS [U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service] (2007) 2007 Census of Agriculture. Available from http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/usv1.pdf. Accessed April 2010

  • Wiens JA (1997) Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the American Museum of Natural History, Chicago Herpetological Society, University of Illinois, and Illinois State Academy of Science. We thank J. Wolff and S. Zec for assistance with fieldwork. S. Buck, T. Moyer and B. Towey provided invaluable logistical support, and we are grateful to the Richardson Wildlife Foundation for facilitating this research. G. Batzli, E. Heske, and the Schooley lab group provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Scientific permit authorization was granted by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources under 110 ILC 425/20, and animal care and handling was covered by IACUC protocol 09026.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley J. Cosentino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cosentino, B.J., Schooley, R.L. & Phillips, C.A. Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landscape Ecol 26, 371–379 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9563-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9563-1

Keywords

Navigation