Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services

  • Research article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape ecological research about the cultural dimension of ecosystem services remains less developed as compared to other aspects of ecosystem services about landscapes. In this article, the cultural dimension of ecosystem services is defined as the psychological, cultural, and social relationships that influence people’s connections to biodiversity and landscapes as well as to what benefits they consider useful and relevant. Yet to meet the challenge of understanding sustainability in different landscapes, such as urban ones, research about ecosystem services in landscape ecology will need to shift its emphasis towards the scale of people’s experience of landscapes. As a means to improve this situation, cultivating deep care is proposed as a key concept to better integrate the cultural dimension of ecosystem services into landscape ecological research about urban landscapes. Cultivating deep care is defined as the adaptive process for deepening people’s affinity of urban nature including enhancing people’s appreciation, awareness, and actions for biodiversity, landscapes, and their own well-being that will ultimately benefit ecosystem services. The heart of this article is a conceptual framework that begins to outline the scope and boundaries of cultivating deep care as a key concept and connects it to its intellectual context that includes research such as landscape sustainability, landscape perception, resilience science, and ecosystem services. An important assumption is that cultivating deep care is a “work in progress,” which will grow and evolve over time as new knowledge is contributed to it. In the conceptual framework, several principles explore and flesh important ideas and relationships about cultivating deep care as a key concept. Each principle is organized around three parts: (1) a brief description; (2) relevance to landscape ecological research; and (3) recommended research topics. Using these principles, I suggest potential avenues to advance landscape ecological research about biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in a new urban world. Landsc Urban Plan 100:341–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern J (2013) Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landsc Ecol

  • Aker A, Barton J, Cossey R, Gainsford P, Griffin M, Micklewright D (2012) Visual color perception in green exercise: positive effects on mood and perceived exertion. Environ Sci Technol 46:8661–8666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthel S, Folke C, Colding J (2010) Social-ecological memory in urban gardens-retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change 20:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton J, Pretty J (2010) What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol 44:3947–3955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA (2009) Ecosystem services and sacred natural sites: reconciling material and non-material in nature conservation. Environ Values 18:417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch AM, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards M, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC (2012) Toward principles for enhancing resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs AE, Fischer A, Rink D, Young JC (2008) Looking beyond superficial knowledge gaps: understanding public representations of biodiversity. Int J Biodiversity Sci Manag 4:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KMA, Guerry AD, Balvanera P, Klain S, Satterfield T, Basurto X, Bostrom A, Chuenpagdee R, Gould R, Halpern BS, Hannahs N, Levine J, Norton B, Ruckelshaus M, Russell R, Tam J, Woodside U (2012a) Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience 62:744–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012b) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1737–1738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S, Myers G (2009) Conservation psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. John Wiley, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Colding J (2007) ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 81:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colding J, Barthel S (2013) The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities. Ecol Econ 86:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley TM, Hardiman NA (2007) The beginning of a new invasive plant: a history of the ornamental callery pear in the United States. Bioscience 57:956–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landsc Ecol 26:899–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming S, Olsson P, Chapin III, Holling CS (2013) Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes. Landsc Ecol

  • Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJ, Davies ZG, Roquette JR, Maltby LL, Warren PH, Armsworth RP, Gaston KJ (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8812–8819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dean J, van Dooren K, Weinstien P (2011) Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings? Med Hypotheses 76:877–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • del Tredici P (2010) Wild urban plants of the Northeast: a field guide. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary.com (2013) Definition of adapt. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adapt?s=t. Accessed 1 June 2013

  • Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC (2011) A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landsc Urban Plan 99:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett N, Nagase A, Hallam A (2008) The dynamics of planted and colonizing species on a green roof over six growing seasons 2001–2006: influence of substrate depth. Urban Ecosyst 11:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson H, van der Leeuw S, Redman CL, Meffert DJ, Davis G, Alfsen C, Elmqvist T (2010) Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39:531–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felson AJ, Pickett STA (2005) Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Young JC (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Langers F, Bednar-Friedl B, Geamana N, Skogen K (2011) Mental representations of animal and plant species in their social contexts: results from a survey in Europe. J Environ Psychol 31:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Change 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RA, Lorimer J (2011) Urban reconciliation ecology: the potential of living roofs and walls. J Environ Manage 92:1429–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C, Dickinson JM, Porter S, van Heezik Y (2012) “My garden is an expression of me”: exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. J Environ Psychol 32:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3:390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffin SR, Khanbilvardi R, Rosenzweig C (2009) Development of a green roof environmental monitoring and meteorological network in New York City. Sensors 9:2647–2660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi A, Turner N (2004) Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecol Soc 9(3):1 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1/

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 22:959–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Environ 25:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (In press 2012) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Gos P, Lavorel S (2012) Stakeholders’ expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity. Int J Biodiversity Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 8:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojimas D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Montserrat V, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson SM, Maltby L, Paetzold A, Phillips D (2007) Getting a measure of nature: cultures and values in an ecosystem services approach. Interdisc Sci Rev 32:249–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann M, Westermann JR, Kowarik I, van der Meer E (2012) Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban For Urban Green 11:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, Connolly J, Harpole WS, Reich PB, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Tilman D, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Wilsey BJ, Zavaleta ES, Loreau M (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson M, Rahm J, Gyllin M (2012) Landowners’ participation in biodiversity conservation examined through the value-belief-norm theory. Landsc Res. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.673576

    Google Scholar 

  • Joye Y (2007) Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: the case of biophilic architecture. Rev Gen Psychol 11:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junge X, Jacot KA, Bosshard A, Lindemann-Matthies P (2009) Swiss people’s attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. J Nat Conserv 17:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser FG (2006) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Pers Individ Differ 41:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R (2001) The nature of the view from home: psychological benefits. Environ Behav 33:507–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Wilson EO (1995) The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight KS, Kurylo JS, Endress AG, Stewart JR, Reich RB (2007) Ecology and ecosystem impacts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica): a review. Biol Invasion 9:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Ylén M (2007) Perceived health is associated with visiting natural favourite places in the vicinity. Health Place 13:138–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H (2008) Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health Place 14:636–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korpela KM, Ylén M, Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H (2010) Favorite green, waterside and urban environments, restorative experiences and perceived health in Finland. Health Promot Int 25:200–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Kumar P (2008) Valuation of the ecosystems services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 64:808–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S (2011) Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change 11:791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leichenko R (2011) Climate change and urban resilience. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis CA (1996) Green nature/human nature: the meaning of plants in our lives. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P (2005) ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: how children’s interest in common local organisms can be enhance through observation of nature. Int J Sci Educ 27:655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E (2007) Species richness, structural diversity and species composition in meadows created by visitors of a botanical garden in Switzerland. Landsc Urban Plan 29:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies P, Junge X, Matthies D (2010) The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biol Conserv 143:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister NM (2007) Sustainable large parks: ecological design or designer ecology? In: Czerniak J, Hargreaves G (eds) Large parks. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, pp 35–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods. Algonquin Books, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations of urban bird and plant communities to human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 4:816–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytimäki J, Petersen LK, Normander B, Bezák P (2008) Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environ Sci 5:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mårtensson F, Boldemann C, Söderström M, Blennow M, Englund JE, Grahn P (2009) Outdoor environment assessment of attention promoting settings for preschool children. Health Place 15:1149–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, García Del Amo D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA, Santos-Martin F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago Montes C (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7:e38970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (2010) The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun 32:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Environ 20:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita E, Fukuda S, Nagano J, Hamajima N, Yamamoto H, Iwai Y, Nakashima T, Ohira H, Shirakawa T (2007) Psychological effects of forest environments on healthy adults: shinrin-yoku (forest-air breathing, walking) as a possible methods for stress reduction. Public Health 121:54–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio L (2009) The scientific basis for design for landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landsc Ecol 24:993–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchio L (2011) The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landsc Ecol 26:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P (2013) Using ecosystem services in community-based landscape planning: science is not ready to deliver. In: Fu B, Jones KB (eds) Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture. Springer, New York, pp 77–1001

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C (2013) Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollan M (2001) The botany of desire: a plant’s eye view of the world. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouta E, Rekola M (2001) The theory of planned behavior in predicting the willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Soc Nat Resour 14:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle RM (1978) The extinction of experience. Horticulture 56:64–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010a) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald GK, Pfeifer L (2010b) Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60:576–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance (2013) Adaptive capacity. http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/adaptive_capacity. Accessed 31 May 2013

  • Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology: how the Earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe DB (2011) Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environ Pollut 159:2100–2110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 20:702–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Science Dictionary (2013) Definition of adaption. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adaption?s=t. Accessed 1 June 2013

  • Snep R, Van Ierland E, Opdam P (2009) Enhancing biodiversity at business sites: what are the options, and which of these do stakeholders prefer? Landsc Urban Plan 91:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliva R, Hunizker M (2009) How do biodiversity and conservation values relate to landscape preferences? A case study from the Swiss Alps. Biodiversity Conserv 9:2483–2507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidball KG (2012) Urgent biophilia: human-nature interactions and biological attractions in disaster resilience. Ecology and Society 17(2):5 [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04596-170205

  • Tress B, Tress G (2001) Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg AE, Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2010) Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc Sci Med 70:1203–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Velarde MD, Fry G, Tveit M (2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes—landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban For Urban Green 6:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World English Dictionary (2013a) Definition of adaption. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/adaption?s=t Accessed 1 June 2013

  • World English Dictionary (2013b) Definition of capacity http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/capacity?s=t Accessed 2 June 2013

  • Wu J (2010) Landscape of culture and culture of landscape: does landscape ecology need culture? Landsc Ecol 25:1147–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2013a) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landsc Ecol 28:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (2013b) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landsc Ecol

Download references

Acknowledgments

I want to thank all of the reviewers who provided constructive feedback on draft of this manuscript. In addition, I am grateful for the financial support for these activities that was provided by the Institute on the Environment, College of Design, and Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Minnesota.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Minnesota, 89 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Laura R. Musacchio

Authors
  1. Laura R. Musacchio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura R. Musacchio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Musacchio, L.R. Cultivating deep care: integrating landscape ecological research into the cultural dimension of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 28, 1025–1038 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9907-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9907-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation