Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential for large-scale wildlife corridors between protected areas in Brazil using the jaguar as a model species

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most large reserves in Brazil do not hold viable populations of jaguars to guarantee the species’ long-term survival. Corridors linking populations have been identified as a potential tool to avoid negative effects of isolation, increasing population viability. Here, we performed a Brazil-wide evaluation of potential large scale corridors connecting protected jaguar populations. Six variables (human population size, dam reservoir size, number of dams, roads, railways and cities) expected to negatively impact jaguar movement were analyzed across 180 potential corridors connecting 298 protected jaguar areas. We established overall disturbance scores for the corridors using a principal components analysis and compared them among the Brazilian biomes. We further investigated which variables separated biomes using a canonical variates analysis. The Atlantic Forest and the semi-arid Caatinga have the most impacted potential corridors, whereas the Amazon and Pantanal still have the best potential corridors. Corridor quality in the Cerrado grasslands was intermediate. All variables but human population size and corridor length contributed significantly to differences in corridor variables among biomes. Our conclusions suggest that we need to plan the implementation of large scale corridors in the Amazon, Pantanal and particularly the Cerrado soon, while potential corridors might still be economically viable. In the much more impacted Atlantic Forest and Caatinga, the need for conservation actions is strongest, but logistical difficulties and costs may turn implementation of corridors unfeasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANA (2006) Base Hidrográfica Ottocodificada. Biblioteca Virtual da Agência Nacional de Águas. http://metadados.ana.gov.br/geonetwork/srv/pt/main.home

  • ANA (2008) Barragens Reguladas pela ANA integrantes do SNISB. Biblioteca Virtual da Agência Nacional de Águas. http://metadados.ana.gov.br/geonetwork/srv/pt/main.home

  • ANA (2011) Barragens Reguladas pela ANA integrantes do SNISB. Biblioteca Virtual da Agência Nacional de Águas. http://metadados.ana.gov.br/geonetwork/srv/pt/main.home

  • Astete S, Sollmann R, Silveira L (2008) Comparative jaguar ecology in Brazil. Cat News Spec Issue 4:9–14

  • Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12(6):1241–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélisle M (2005) Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:1988–1995

  • Bélisle M, Desrochers A, Fortin MJ (2001) Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82:1893–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2005) Matrix spatial structure can obscure the relationship between inter-patch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology 86:1023–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasil, Presidência da República (2012) Lei No 12651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa; altera as Leis nos 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, 9.393, de 19 de dezembro de 1996, e 11.428, de 22 de dezembro de 2006; revoga as Leis nos 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, e 7.754, de 14 de abril de 1989, e a Medida Provisória no 2.166-67, de 24 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8629.htm. Accessed Feb 2013

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GA, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues AS (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61

  • Canale GR, Peres CA, Guidorizzi CE, Gatto CAF, Kierulff MCM (2012) Pervasive defaunation of forest remnants in a tropical biodiversity hotspot. PLoS ONE 7:e41671

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, Noss RF, Paquet PC (2001) Carnivores as focal species for conservation planning in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecol Appl 11:961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelletti CHM, Silva JMC, Tabarelli M, Santos AMM (2004) Quanto ainda resta da Caatinga? Uma estimativa preliminar. In: Silva JMC, Tabarelli M, Fonseca M et al (eds) Biodiversidade da Caatinga: áreas e ações prioritárias para a conservação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, pp 91–100

  • Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63(2):215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti RB, Joly CA (2002) Biodiversity and conservation priorities in the Cerrado region. In: Oliveira PS, Marquis RJ (eds) The Cerrados of Brazil. Ecology and natural history of a neotropical savannah. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetkiewicz CB, Clair CCS, Boyce MS (2006) Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37:317–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchero F, Conde DA, Manterola C, Chávez C, Rivera A, Ceballos G (2011) Jaguars on the move: modeling movement to mitigate fragmentation from road expansion in the Mayan Forest. Animal Conserv 14(2):158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde DA, Colchero F, Zarza H, Christensen NL Jr, Sexton JO, Manterola C, Chávez C, Rivera A, Azuara D, Ceballos G (2010) Sex matters: modeling male and female habitat differences for jaguar conservation. Biol Conserv 143(9):1980–1988

  • Costa LP, Leite YLR, Mendes SL, Ditchfield AD (2005) Mammal conservation in Brazil. Conserv Biol 19:672–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawshaw PG, Quigley HB (1991) Jaguar spacing, activity, and habitat use in a seasonally flooded environment. J Zool 223:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JL (2006) Jaguars as landscape detectives for the conservation of Atlantic forests in Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kent

  • de Oliveira TG, Ramalho EE, de Paula RC (2012) Red List assessment of the jaguar in Brazilian Amazonia. Cat News Spe Issue 7:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paula R, Campos C, Oliveira TG (2012) Red List assessment for the jaguar in the Caatinga biome. Cat News Spec Issue 7:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside PM (2005) Deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: history, rates, and consequences. Conserv Biol 19(3):680–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M-J, Agrawal AA (2005) Landscape ecology comes of age. Ecology 86:1965–1966

  • Gardner TA, Barlow J, Chazdon R, Ewers RM, Harvey CA, Peres CA, Sodhi NS (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in human-modified world. Ecol Lett 12:561–582

  • Gascon C, Williamson B, da Fonseca GAB (2000) Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288:1356–1358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol 24(3):660–668

  • Gillies CS, St. Clair CC (2008) Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest. PNAS 105:19774–19779

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine E (1990) Protecting biological diversity through the greater ecosystem concept. Nat Area J 10:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag T, Santos AS, Sana DA, Morato RG, Cullen L Jr, Crawshaw PG Jr, De Angelo C, Di Bitetti MS, Salzano FM, Eizirik E (2010) The effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of a top predator: loss of diversity and high differentiation among remnant populations of Atlantic Forest jaguars (Panthera onca). Mol Ecol 19(22):4906–4921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Tewksbury JJ (2006) Impacts of corridors on populations and communities. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 390–415

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1991) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol J Linn Soc 42(1):17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MB, Tomas W, Mourão G, Da Silva CJ, Guimarães E, Sonoda F, Fachim E (2005) Challenges to safeguard the Pantanal wetlands, Brazil: threats and conservation initiatives. Conserv Biol 19:714–720

  • Harrison S, Hastings A (1996) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of a metapopulation structure. Trends Ecol Evol 11:180–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz SK, Strand E (2006) Adaptive patch searching strategies in fragmented landscapes. Evol Ecol 20(2):113–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilty JA, Lidicker WZ Jr, Merenlender AM (2006) Corridor ecology. The science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ (1992) The role of corridors in conservation: solution or bandwagon? Trends Ecol Evol 7:389–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE (2004) Mapa de Vegetação do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Scale 1:5.000.000. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/default_prod.shtm#REC_NAT

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE (2005) Mapa da Infra-estrutura de Transportes 2005. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geografia/mapas_doc4.shtm

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE (2010a) Censo Demográfico 2010. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística—IBGE (2010b) Mapeamento das Unidades Territoriais. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/cartografia/territ_localidades.shtm

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadoya T (2009) Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data. Popul Ecol 51:5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffner C, Stoner C, Caro T (2012) Edge effects and large mammal distributions in a national park. Animal Conserv 16:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol 19:707–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC (1997) Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. J Mamm 78:320–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal IR, Da Silva JMC, Tabarelli M, Lacher TE (2005) Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the Caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Conserv Biol 19:701–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees AC, Peres CA (2008) Conservation value of remnant riparian forest corridors of varying quality for amazonian birds and mammals. Conserv Biol 22(2):439–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyola RD, Oliveira-Santos LGR, Almeida-Neto M, Nogueira DM, Kubota U, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM (2009) Integrating economic costs and biological traits into global conservation priorities for carnivores. PLoS ONE 4(8):e6807

  • Manly BFJ (1994) Multivariate statistical methods, a primer. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzolli M (2008) Loss of historical range of jaguars in southern Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18(6):1715–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski F, Boulhosa RLP, Faria A, Peres CA (2006) Human-wildlife conflicts in a fragmented Amazonian Forest landscape: determinants of large felid depredation on livestock. Anim Conserv 9:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MMA - Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (2007) Áreas Prioritárias para Conservação, Uso Sustentável e Repartição de Benefícios da Biodiversidade Brasileira: Atualização - Portaria MMA n°9, de 23 de janeiro de 2007. Brasília

  • Moraes EA Jr (2012) The status of the jaguar in the Cerrado. Cat News Spec Issue 7:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison JS, Sechrest W, Dinerstein E, Wilcove DS, Lamoreux JF (2007) Persistence of large mammal faunas as indicators of global human impacts. J Mamm 88:1363–1380

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, Daly KM (2006) Incorporating connectivity into broad-scale conservation planning. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 587–619

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paviolo A, De Angelo CD, Di Blanco YE, Di Bitetti MS (2008) Jaguar Panthera onca population decline in the Upper Parana Atlantic Forest of Argentina and Brazil. Oryx 42:554–561

  • Rabinowitz A, Zeller K (2010) A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biol Conserv 143:939–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158(1):87-99

  • Rocha LB (2007) Brazil’s impact on the world sugar market: an overview and challenges for the industry. Int Sugar J 109(1305):541–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Sluys MV, Alves MAS (2006) Biologia da conservação: essências. Editora Rima, São Carlos

    Google Scholar 

  • Roques S, Furtado M, Jacomo ATA, Silveira L, Sollmann R, Tôrres NM, Godoy JA, Palomares F (2014) Monitoring jaguar populations Panthera onca with non-invasive genetics: a pilot study in Brazilian ecosystems. Oryx 48(3):361–369

  • Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Chetkiewicz CB, Medellin RA, Rabinowitz RA, Robinson JG, Taber AB (2002) Planning to save a species: the jaguar as a model. Conserv Biol 16:1–15

  • Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M, Katariya V, Lamoreux J, Rodrigues AS, Stuart SN, Temple HJ, Baillie J, Boitani L, Lacher TE Jr, Mittermeier RA, Smith AT, Absolon D, Aguiar JM, Amori G, Bakkour N, Baldi R, Berridge RJ, Bielby J, Black PA, Blanc JJ, Brooks TM, Burton JA, Butynski TM, Catullo G, Chapman R, Cokeliss Z, Collen B, Conroy J, Cooke JG, da Fonseca GA, Derocher AE, Dublin HT, Duckworth JW, Emmons L, Emslie RH, Festa-Bianchet M, Foster M, Foster S, Garshelis DL, Gates C, Gimenez-Dixon M, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Maya JF, Good TC, Hammerson G, Hammond PS, Happold D, Happold M, Hare J, Harris RB, Hawkins CE, Haywood M, Heaney LR, Hedges S, Helgen KM, Hilton-Taylor C, Hussain SA, Ishii N, Jefferson TA, Jenkins RK, Johnston CH, Keith M, Kingdon J, Knox DH, Kovacs KM, Langhammer P, Leus K, Lewison R, Lichtenstein G, Lowry LF, Macavoy Z, Mace GM, Mallon DP, Masi M, McKnight MW, Medellín RA, Medici P, Mills G, Moehlman PD, Molur S, Mora A, Nowell K, Oates JF, Olech W, Oliver WR, Oprea M, Patterson BD, Perrin WF, Polidoro BA, Pollock C, Powel A, Protas Y, Racey P, Ragle J, Ramani P, Rathbun G, Reeves RR, Reilly SB, Reynolds JE 3rd, Rondinini C, Rosell-Ambal RG, Rulli M, Rylands AB, Savini S, Schank CJ, Sechrest W, Self-Sullivan C, Shoemaker A, Sillero-Zubiri C, De Silva N, Smith DE, Srinivasulu C, Stephenson PJ, van Strien N, Talukdar BK, Taylor BL, Timmins R, Tirira DG, Tognelli MF, Tsytsulina K, Veiga LM, Vié JC, Williamson EA, Wyatt SA, Xie Y, Young BE (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat and knowledge. Science 322:225–230

  • Shepherd B, Whittington J (2006) Response of wolves to corridor restoration and human use management. Ecol Soc 11(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Jonsson BG, Luitkart G (2000) Habitat loss: ecological, evolutionary and genetic consequences. Trends Ecol Evol 15:132–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira L (2004) Comparative ecology of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) in the Cerrado and Pantanal. Ph.D. thesis, University of Brasília

  • Silveira L, Jácomo ATA (2002) Conservación del jaguar en el centro del Cerrado de Brasil. In: Medellín RA, Equihua C, Chetkiewitcz CLB et al (eds) El Jaguar en El Nuevo Milenio. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Wildlife Conservation Society, Mexico, New Cork, pp 437–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Farr JA, Cox J, Mehlman DW (1992) Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conserv Biol 6:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares-Filho B, Nepstad D, Curran L et al (2006) Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440:520–523

  • Soares TN, Telles MPC, Resende LV, Silveira L, Jácomo ATA, Morato RG, Diniz-Filho JAF, Eizirik E, Brondani RPV, Brondani C (2006) Paternity testing and behavioral ecology: a case study of jaguars (Panthera onca) in Emas National Park, Central Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 29:735–740

  • Soisalo MK, Cavalcanti S (2006) Estimating the density of a jaguar population in the Brazilian Pantanal using camera-traps and capture-recapture sampling in combination with GPS radio-telemetry. Biol Conserv 129:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sollmann R, Tôrres NM, Silveira L (2008) Jaguar conservation in Brazil: the role of protected areas. Cat News Spec Issue 4:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollmann R, Furtado MM, Gardner B, Hofer H, Jacomo ATA, Tôrres NM, Silveira L (2011) Improving density estimates for elusive carnivores: accounting for sex-specific detection and movements using spatial capture-recapture models for jaguars in central Brazil. Biol Conserv 144:1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz FA (2000) The Pantanal in the 21st century—for the planet’s largest wetland, an uncertain future. In: Swartz FA (ed) The Pantanal of Brazil. Paraguay and bolivia. Hudson MacArthur Publishers, Gouldsboro, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara PM (2011) Matrix-dependent corridor effectiveness and the abundance of forest birds in fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecol 26(8):1085–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodroffe R, Ginsberg JR (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280:2126–2128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller K (2007) Jaguars in the new millennium data set update: the state of the jaguar in 2006. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller KA, Nijhawan S, Salom-Pérez R, Potosme SH, Hines JE (2011) Integrating occupancy modeling and interview data for corridor identification: a case study for jaguars in Nicaragua. Biol Conserv 144:892–901

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Memphis Zoo, Earthwatch Institute, Monsanto Fund and Mantecorp for financial support of JCF work on jaguar corridors across Brazil. We are indebted with Raphael Almeida and Renato Moreira for help with GIS analyses in the earlier stages of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leandro Silveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silveira, L., Sollmann, R., Jácomo, A.T.A. et al. The potential for large-scale wildlife corridors between protected areas in Brazil using the jaguar as a model species. Landscape Ecol 29, 1213–1223 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0057-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0057-4

Keywords

Navigation