Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the interplay between the politics and policies of multilingualism by looking at the role of political macro-strategies in shaping language and multilingualism policies within the European Union. The paper focuses on the relationship between the European Union’s 2000–2010 Lisbon Strategy on the European Knowledge-Based Economy and the content and scope of EU language and multilingualism policies of the same period. We argue that the economic orientation of the EU language and multilingualism policies of the last decade was mainly determined by the fact that these were subsumed into the overall strategic aims and policy-priorities of Lisbon. Thus, the impact and recontextualisation of typical arguments (e.g. on the skills or competitiveness in/of the EU economy) also dominated EU language policies on multilingualism. Simultaneously, other salient EU-political discourses of the early 2000s (e.g. about the deficiencies of EU democracy, about ‘European values’, or about European social cohesion) were often silenced, or toned down, in EU language and multilingualism policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åkerstrøm-Andersen, N. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies. Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, U. (2006). Language conflicts in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K., Begg, I., & Zeitlin, J. (2008a). Is there a convincing rationale for the Lisbon strategy? Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K., Begg, I., & Zeitlin, J. (2008b). The open method of co-ordination and the governance of the Lisbon strategy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmanova, A. (2009). 1989 and the European social model. Transition without emancipation? Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(9), 1019–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2010). Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates (pp. 1–39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. Frankfurt, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cillia, R., & Wodak, R. (2006). Ist Österreich ein deutsches Land? Anmerkungen zur Sprachenpolitik in der Zweiten Republik. Innsbruck: Studienverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Cillia, R., Krumm, H.-J., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2003). The costs of multilingualism: Globalisation and linguistic diversity. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, D.-P. (2005). The Lisbon process: A European odyssey. European Journal of Education, 40(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000a). Commissions summary of the ‘Europeans and languages’ eurobarometer special survey. Brussels: The European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2000b). Foreign language learning and teaching: European community action. Brussels: The European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006. COM (2003) 449, Brussels, 24/07/2003.

  • European Commission. (2005). A new framework strategy for multilingualism. COM (2005) 596, Brussels, 22/11/2005.

  • European Commission. (2006). White paper on a European Communication Policy. COM (2006) 35, Brussels, 01/02/2006.

  • European Commission. (2007a). A political agenda for multilingualism. MEMO/07/80, Brussels, 23/02/2007.

  • European Commission. (2007b). Framework for the European survey on language competences. COM (2007) 184, Brussels, 13/04/2007.

  • European Commission. (2008a). Outcomes of the European commission’s public consultation on multilingualism, 14 September–15 November 2007. Brussels: The European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008b). Multilingualism: An asset for Europe and a shared commitment. COM (2008) 566, Brussels, 18/09/2008.

  • European Council. (2000). Presidency conclusions—Lisbon European council 23–24 March 2000. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2010). Presidency conclusions—European council 25–26 March 2010. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament/European Council. (2000). Decision No. 1934/2000/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 17 July 2000 on the European year of languages 2001. Official Journal of the European Communities L/232/1 of 14/9/2000.

  • Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (2008) The Bologna process and the Knowledge-Based Economy: A critical discourse analysis approach. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe (pp. 109–127). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contestation among linguistic ideologies. In: B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 317–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gal, S. (2005). Language ideologies compared: Metaphors and circulations of public and private. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (2006). Migration, minorities and multilingualism. In: C. Mar-Molinero, & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Language ideologies, policies and practices: Language and the future of Europe (pp. 13–28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Gal, S. (2010). Linguistic regimes and European diversity. Keynote Lecture delivered at the Conference ‘New Challenges for Multilingualism in Europe’, Dubrovnik, 12 April 2010.

  • Green-Cowles, M., Caporaso, J., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and domestic change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, D. (2007). Internal policies: Reinforcing the new Lisbon message of competitiveness and innovation. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(Annual Review), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifversen, J. (1997). Og magt, demokrati og diskurs. Begrebshistoriske Studier. No 2. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance and post-fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change? Economy and Society, 24(3), 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008a). The cultural political economy of the knowledge-based economy and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe (pp. 13–40). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Jessop, B. (2008b). Introduction. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe (pp. 1–12). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

  • Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, H. C. (2005). Lifelong Learning in the European Union: Whither the Lisbon strategy? European Journal of Education, 40(3), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2007). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2010). Ill fares the land. London: Allen Lane/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M., & Quince, E. (2009). Recent EU policy: A digest. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(1), 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok Report. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Report from the high level group chaired by Wim Kok. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1979). Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2002). The practice of conceptual history. Timing history, spacing concepts. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2008). Multilingualism and the democratic image of the EU: Perspectives from the European public sphere. Paper delivered at the Workshop ‘Bottom-Up Europe’, Salzburg Centre for European Studies, University of Salzburg, 09/05/2008.

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2009). Discourses about Enlarged and multilingual Europe: Perspectives from german and polish national public spheres. In P. Stevenson & J. Carl (Eds.), Language, discourse and identity in central Europe (pp. 23–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2010a). The discursive construction of European identities: A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2010b). Discourses and concepts: Interfaces and synergies between Begriffsgeschichte and the discourse-historical approach in CDA. In R. de Cillia, H. Gruber, M. Krzyżanowski, & F. Menz (Eds.), Diskurs—Politik—Identität/Discourse—Politics—Identity. Essays for Ruth Wodak (pp. 125–137). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). (Mis)Communicating Europe? On deficiencies and challenges in political and institutional communication in the European Union. In B. Kryk-Kastovsky (Ed.), Intercultural communication past and present. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M., & Oberhuber, F. (2007). (Un)Doing Europe: Discourses and practices of negotiating the EU constitution. Brussels: P.I.E.—Peter Lang.

  • Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2008). Multilingualism in EU documents—from 1997 to 2007. Report (Working Paper 2) prepared for the European commission (DG research) within the EU-FP6 research project ‘language dynamics and management of diversity (DYLAN)’. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

  • Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2010). Hegemonic multilingualism in/of the EU institutions: An inside–outside perspective on European language policies and practices. In H. Böhringer, C. Hülmbauer, & E. Vetter (Eds.), Mehrsprachigkeit aus der Perspektive zweier EU-Projekte: DYLAN meets LINEE (pp. 115–135). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, F., & Moore, P. (2009). European language policies in monolingual Southern Europe: Implementation and outcomes. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(2), 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, L., & Stråth, B. (Eds.). (2004). A European social citizenship? Preconditions for future policies from a historical perspective. Brussels: PIE—Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1998). Europe’s “democratic deficit”: The question of standards. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European integration. The ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar-Molinero, C., & Stevenson, P. (Eds.). (2006). Language ideologies, policies and practices: Language and the future of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mény, Y., Muller, P., & Quermonne, J.-L. (Eds.). (1996). Adjusting to Europe: The impact of the European Union on National Institutions and Policies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state-power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muntigl, P., Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2000). European Union discourses on un/employment. An interdisciplinary approach to employment policy-making and organizational change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (2003). English-only Europe? Challenging language policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–122). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (Ed.). (2005). An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K., & Kroskrity, P. (Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (1998). The uses and utility of ideology. A commentary. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 123–145). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Silverstein, M. (2010). Society, polity, and language community: An enlightenment trinity in anthropological perspective. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(3), 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (Ed.). (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (Eds.). (2008). Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (Vol. 1 and 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (Eds.). (2009). The European public sphere and the media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Els, T. (2001). The European Union, its institutions and its languages: Some language political observations. Current Issues in Language Planning, 2(4), 311–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Els, T. (2005). Multilingualism in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. H., Begg, I., & Peterson, J. (Eds.). (2003). Integration in an expanding European Union. Reassessing the fundamentals. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. (2002). Searching for Europe: The problem of legitimisation and representation in recent political speeches on Europe. Journal of Language and Politics, 1(1), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2000). Recontextualization and the transformation of meanings: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies. In S. Sarangi & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Discourse and Social Life (pp. 185–206). Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2005). Linguistic analyses in language policies. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 170–194). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2010). ‘Communicating Europe’: Analyzing, interpreting, and understanding multilingualism and the discursive construction of transnational identities. In A. Duszak, J. House, & Ł. Kumięga (Eds.), Globalization, discourse, media: In a critical perspective (pp. 17–60). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2011). Language, power, and identity. To be published in Language Teaching.

  • Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (Eds.). (2008). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Krzyżanowski, M. (2011). Language in political institutions of multilingual states and European Union. In B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe (pp. 625–641). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Weiss, G. (2004). Visions, ideologies and utopias in the discursive construction of European identities: Organising, representing and legitimising Europe. In M. Pütz, T. A. van Dijk, & J.-A. Neff-van Aertselaer (Eds.), Communicating ideologies: Language, discourse and social practice (pp. 225–252). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2000). Community and communication: The role of language in nation-state building and European integration. Clarendon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2009). The elephant in the room: Language issues in the European Union. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(2), 93–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zgajewski, T., & Hajjar, K. (2005). The Lisbon strategy: Which failure? Whose failure? And why? (Egmont papers No. 6). Brussels: The Royal Institute for International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics and English Language, County College South, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YL, UK

    Michał Krzyżanowski & Ruth Wodak

Authors
  1. Michał Krzyżanowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ruth Wodak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michał Krzyżanowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krzyżanowski, M., Wodak, R. Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy. Lang Policy 10, 115–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9196-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation