nach oben

Journal of Management and Governance

Erschienen in:

01.08.2013

Reflections on knowledge-based approaches to the organization of production

verfasst von: Robert M. Grant

Erschienen in: Journal of Management and Governance | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Knowledge-based approaches to the firm offer valuable insights into some of the central issues of governance and organizational design—especially into long neglected problems of coordination. I start from the assumption that the fundamental problem of economic organization is reconciling efficiency in knowledge development with efficiency in knowledge application. The paper extends the knowledge-based view of the firm and knowledge integration approach to organizational capability that I outlined in earlier papers (Grant in Strategic Management Journal, 1996a; Grant in Journal of Management Studies 7(4)375–387, 1996b) and draws upon subsequent contributions to the literature. From this basis, I derive implications for the relative efficiencies of alternative institutions of economic organization and for the design of firm structures.

Vorheriger Artikel Governing strategy and knowledge: tools and methodologies

Nächster Artikel Remote control: measuring performance for value creation and governance of globally distributed knowledge work

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

The paper also draws upon a paper I presented at the conference on information flows in knowledge intensive firms, Bocconi University, 27 November 2001.

H. Demsetz (1995) makes a similar point. Demsetz distinguishes transaction and specialization theories of the firm, pointing out that transaction costs are the costs of exchange while production costs are the costs of converting inputs into output.

Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002). Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13, 147–161.CrossRef

Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84–93.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 140–157.CrossRef

Camerer, C., & Knez, M. (1996). Coordination, organizational boundaries and fads in business practices. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(1), 89–112.CrossRef

Child, J., & McGrath, R. (1999). Special research forum call for papers: New and evolving organizational forms. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 116.

Choi, C. J., & Hilton, B. (2005). Knowledge resources: Critical systems thinking, viable system model and ‘gifts’. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22, 561–564.CrossRef

Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science;, 7(5), 477–501.CrossRef

Cusumano, M. A. (1997). How microsoft makes large teams work like small teams. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 9–20.

Cusumano, M. A., & Yoffie, D. B. (1998). Competing on internet time: Lessons from netscape and its battle with microsoft. New York: Free Press.

Daft, R., & Lewin, A. (1993). Where are the theories of the ‘new’ organizational forms? Organization Science, 4, i–iv.

Demsetz, H. (1995). The economics of the business firm: Seven critical commentaries (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Donaldson, L. (1995). American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.CrossRef

Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of microfoundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441–455.CrossRef

Foss, N. J. (1996). More critical comments on knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5), 519–523.CrossRef

Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.CrossRef

Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.

Grant, R. M. (1996a). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special issue), 109–122.

Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.CrossRef

Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61–84.CrossRef

Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer Special Issue), 83–103.CrossRef

Jensen, M. C. (1998). Foundations of organizational strategy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1998). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. In M. C. Jensen (Ed.), Foundations of organizational strategy (pp. 103–125). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 384.CrossRef

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7, 502–518.

Lyles, M. A. (1988). Learning among joint-venture sophisticated firms. Management International Review, 28(special issues), 85–98.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management (p. 91). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.

Narduzzo, A., Rocco, E., & Warglien, M. (2000). Talking about routines in the field. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—the problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.CrossRef

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRef

Ouchi, W. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.CrossRef

Pentland, B. T. (1992). Organizing moves in software support hot lines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 527–548.CrossRef

Pisano, G. P. (1994). Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: an empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Winter special issue), 85–100.CrossRef

Porter, M. E., & Siggelkow, N. (2008). Contextual interactions within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2), 34–56.CrossRef

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373–1394.CrossRef

Puranam, P., & Jacobides, M. C. (2006).The dynamics of coordination regimes: Implications for organizational design. London Business School discussion paper (April).

Robertson, D. H. (1930). Control of industry (p. 85). London: Nisbet & Co.

Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter special issue), 63–76.

Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row.

Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.

Simon, H. A. (1982). Sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25–44.

Simonin, B. L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1150–1174.CrossRef

Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and consequences of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library Edition, chapter 1. (Originally published 1776).

Spender, J.-C. (1992). Limits to learning from the west: How Western management advice may prove limited in Eastern Europe. International Executive, 34(5), 389–410.CrossRef

Taylor, F. W. (1916). The principles of scientific management. Bulletin of the Taylor Society. Reprinted in J. M. Shafritz and J. S. Ott (Eds.), Classics of Organization Theory, pp. 66–81. Chicago: Dorsey Press.

Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.

Walsh, J. P., Meyer, A. D., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (2006). A future for organization theory: Living in and living with changing organizations. Organization Science, 17(5), 657–671.CrossRef

Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRef

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism (p. 143). New York: Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296.CrossRef

Winter, S. G. (2000). The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 981–996.CrossRef

Womack, J., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.

Wruck, K. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1994). Science, specific knowledge, and total quality management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18, 247–287.CrossRef

Titel: Reflections on knowledge-based approaches to the organization of production
verfasst von: Robert M. Grant
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Management and Governance / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1385-3457
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-963X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9195-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation

The nature of knowledge and the platform and matrix solutions in the design of knowledge management systems

Applying the ‘comply-or-explain’ principle: discursive legitimacy tactics with regard to codes of corporate governance

Power and trust in board–CEO relationships

Exploring information technology governance and control of web site content: a comparative case study

Remote control: measuring performance for value creation and governance of globally distributed knowledge work