Skip to main content
Log in

To seek variety or uniformity: The role of culture in consumers’ choice in a group setting

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One stream of research suggests that individuals in a collectivistic culture tend to follow the others’ choices in a group choice setting (e.g., Markus and Kitayama 1991). Other research, however, suggests that the choices others make have little impact on the individuals’ choices in this cultural context (e.g., Kim and Drolet 2003). The current research attempts to test these competing hypotheses by examining individuals’ choices in group choice contexts (Ariely and Levav 2000). First, comparisons of 517 meal order slips from two local restaurants in Korea with simulated outcomes indicate a profound group-level uniformity seeking in dish selections. Second, our field experiment reveals that members of a collectivist culture tend to follow group members’ choices when group influence is evident. Unlike the previous findings of studies conducted on individuals from Western cultures, selections made in accordance with the cultural norm do not result in the reduction of emotional well-being for the collectivist cultural individuals. Finally, we provide more direct evidence for the hypothesized role of culture by showing that the choices of individuals with collectivistic cultural backgrounds are associated with higher uniformity-seeking tendency compared to those of individualistic cultural backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The VI is lower for larger than smaller size tables for both real and simulated groups (ps <0.01). However, the null interaction effect between the table type (real vs. simulated) and group size indicates that this linear trend should be attributed to the nature of VI that does not adjust for the overlap of choice by chance, rather than increasing conformity with table size.

  2. The overall VI in study 2B was lower than those of study 1A. As noted, the size of the menu selection in study 1B was much smaller than in study 1A (four vs. 34), leading to greater potential for choice overlap.

  3. Initially, 29 groups (95 participants) of international students were recruited. Based on post hoc screening, we eliminated ten groups because they included at least one member from collectivist culture (e.g., students from China, Singapore, and Saudi Arabia). Cultural backgrounds of the individualist participants include North America (n = 40), Europe (n = 10), and others (n = 4).

  4. Additional analysis treating knowledge as continuous variable also yielded the same results. In this analysis, the real VI score was regressed on knowledge index for the collectivist and the individualist groups, separately. The results showed that knowledge score was related to the VI score for collectivist groups (b = 0.27, t = 1.78, p = 0.08), but not for individualist groups (b = 0.03, t = 0.34, p = 0.74).

References

  • Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briley, D. A., & Aaker, J. L. (2006). When does culture matter? Effects of personal knowledge on the correction of culture-based judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 626–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drolet, A. (2002). Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change’s sake. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., & Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivist societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(4), 326–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). Culture, dissonance, and self-affirmation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the minds. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 785–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2007). “Express Yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognitions, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Money, R. B., Gilly, M. C., & Graham, J. L. (1998). Explorations of national culture and word-of-mouth referral behavior in the purchase of industrial services in the United States and Japan. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., & Kahneman, D. (1999). Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takada, H., & Jain, D. (1991). Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in Pacific Rim countries. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulte, C., & Stremersch, S. (2004). Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: A meta-analytic test. Marketing Science, 23(4), 530–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Seoung Wan Cho, Jieun Choi, Chiah Cheon, Jinkyung Goo, Kyoungmi Kim, So Hyun Kim, Eun-Eui Lee, Jiheon Lee, Hyesung Park, and Kikyung Park for their assistance in data collection. The authors also thank the manager of Little Province (study 1A) and the owner of Ire restaurant (study 1B) and Utpal Dholakia (Study 3) in their generous supports in data collection. Correspondence: Song-Oh Yoon and Kwanho Suk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwanho Suk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, S.O., Suk, K., Lee, S.M. et al. To seek variety or uniformity: The role of culture in consumers’ choice in a group setting. Mark Lett 22, 49–64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-010-9102-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-010-9102-5

Keywords

Navigation