Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated Kerogen Classification in Microscope Images of Dispersed Kerogen Preparation

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop the classification part of a system that analyses transmitted light microscope images of dispersed kerogen preparation. The system automatically extracts kerogen pieces from the image and labels each piece as either inertinite or vitrinite. The image pre-processing analysis consists of background removal, identification of kerogen material, object segmentation, object extraction (individual images of pieces of kerogen) and feature calculation for each object. An expert palynologist was asked to label the objects into categories inertinite and vitrinite, which provided the ground truth for the classification experiment. Ten state-of-the-art classifiers and classifier ensembles were compared: Naïve Bayes, decision tree, nearest neighbour, the logistic classifier, multilayered perceptron (MLP), support vector machines (SVM), AdaBoost, Bagging, LogitBoost and Random Forest. The logistic classifier was singled out as the most accurate classifier, with an accuracy greater than 90. Using a 10 times 10-fold cross-validation provided within the Weka software, we found that the logistic classifier was significantly better than five classifiers (p<0.05) and indistinguishable from the other four classifiers. The initial set of 32 features was subsequently reduced to 6 features without compromising the classification accuracy. A further evaluation of the system alerted us to the possible sensitivity of the classification to the ground truth that might vary from one human expert to another. The analysis also revealed that the logistic classifier made most of the correct classifications with a high certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athersuch J, Banner FT, Higgins AC, Howarth RJ, Swaby PA (1994) The application of expert systems to the identification and use of microfossils in the petroleum industry. Math Geol 26(4):483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 504 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, New York, 738 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann J, Quinn P, Vela M, Brabec B, Brechner S, Cortés M, Hilbrecht H, Schmidt DN, Schiebel R, Thierstein HR (2004) Automated particle analysis: Calcareous microfossils. In: Francus P (ed) Image analysis, sediments and paleoenvironments. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonton P, Boucher A, Thonnat M, Tomczak R, Hidalgo P, Belmonte J, Galan C (2001) Colour image in 2d and 3d microscopy for the automation of pollen rate measurement. Image Anal Stereol 20:527–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher A, Hidalgo P, Thonnat M, Belmonte J, Galan C, Bonton P, Tomczak R (2002) Development of a semi-automatic system for pollen recognition. Aerobiologia 18(3–4):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1996) Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 26(2):123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International, Belmont, 335 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles JJ, Kuncheva L, Wells B, Lim I (2008a) Object segmentation within microscope images of palynofacies. Comput Geosci 34:688–698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles JJ, Kuncheva LI, Wells B, Lim I (2008b) Background segmentation in microscope images. In: Proc 3rd international conference on computer vision theory and applications VISAPP08, Madeira, Portugal, pp 283–294

  • Cristianini N, Taylor S-J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 189 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, 680 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Flesche H, Nielsen AA, Larsen R (2000) Supervised mineral classification with semiautomatic training and validation set generation in scanning electron microscope energy dispersive spectroscopy images of thin sections. Math Geol 32(3):337–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France I, Duller A, Duller G, Lamb H (2000) A new approach to automated pollen analysis. Quat Sci Rev 19(6):537–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund Y, Schapire RE (1997) A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput Syst Sci 55(1):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2000) Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Ann Stat 28(2):337–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand DJ, Yu K (2001) Idiot’s Bayes—not so stupid after all? Int Stat Rev 69:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York, 536 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills S (1988) Outline extraction of microfossils in reflected light images. Camput Geosci 14(4):481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonker R, Groben R, Tarran G, Medlin L, Wilkins M, Garcia L, Zabala L, Boddy L (2000) Automated identification and characterisation of microbial populations using flow cytometry: the aims project. Sci Mar 64:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers. Methods and algorithms. Wiley, New York, 376 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Thonnat M, Berthod M (1994) Automatic classification of planktonic foraminifera by a knowledge-based system. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on artificial intelligence for applications. IEEE Computer Society Press, San Antonio, pp 358–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaby PA (1992) VIDES: An expert system for visually identifying microfossils. IEEE Expert: Intell Syst Their Appl 7(2):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson RV (1990) Automated transmitted light kerogen typing by image analysis. Meded Rijks Geol Dienst 45:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent L, Soille P (1991) Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(6):583–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (1995) Automatic identification of rocks in thin sections using texture analysis. Math Geol 27(7):847–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller AF, Corcoran J, Harris AJ, Ware JA (2005) The semi-automated classification of sedimentary organic matter in palynological preparations. Comput Geosci 31(10):1213–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller AF, Harris AJ, Ware JA, Jarvis PS (2006) Determining the saliency of feature measurements obtained from images of sedimentary organic matter for use in its classification. Comput Geosci 32(9):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller AF, Harris AJ, Ware JA (2007) Two supervised neural networks for classification of sedimentary organic matter images from palynological preparations. Math Geol 39(7):657–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins MF, Boddy L, Morris CW, Jonker RR (1999) Identification of phytoplankton from flow cytometry data by using radial basis function neural networks. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(10):4404—4410

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 525 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. I. Kuncheva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuncheva, L.I., Charles, J.J., Miles, N. et al. Automated Kerogen Classification in Microscope Images of Dispersed Kerogen Preparation. Math Geosci 40, 639–652 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9163-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9163-7

Keywords

Navigation