Skip to main content
Log in

A Unified Approach for Modeling and Designing Attribute Sampling Plans for Monitoring Dependent Production Processes

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a probabilistic model to represent some general dependent production processes and present a unified approach for designing attribute sampling plans for monitoring the ongoing production process. This model includes the classical iid model, independent model, Markov-dependent model and previous-sum dependent model, to mention a few. Some important properties of this model are established. We derive the recurrence relations for the probability distribution of the sum of n consecutive characteristics observed from the process. Using these recurrence relations, we present efficient algorithms for designing optimal single and double sampling plans for attributes, for monitoring the ongoing production process. Our algorithmic approach, which uses effectively the recurrence relations, yields a direct and an exact method, unlike many approximate methods adopted in the literature. Several interesting examples concerning specific models are discussed and a few tables for some special cases are also presented. It is demonstrated that the optimal double sampling plans lead to about 42% reduction in average sample number over the single sampling plans for process monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. C. Alwyn and H. V. Roberts, “Time series modeling for statistical process control,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics vol. 22 pp. 87–95, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. C. Alwyn and H. V. Roberts, “The problem of misplaced control limits,” Applied Statistics vol. 44 pp. 269–278, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. N. Bhat and R. Lal, “Number of successes in Markov trials,” Advances in Applied Probability vol. 20 pp. 677–680, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. N. Bhat, R. Lal, and M. Karunaratne, “A sequential inspection plan for Markov dependent production processes,” IIE Transactions vol. 22 pp. 56–64, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Castagliola, “Exponential probability of defectives in sampling,” In Proceedings of the 50th ASQC Annual Quality Congress, 1996.

  • A. J. Duncan, Quality Control and Industrial Statistics, Richard D. Irwin: Homewood, TL, 5th edition, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Guenther, “A procedure for finding double sampling plans for attributes,” Journal of Quality Technology vol. 2 pp. 219–225, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 3rd edition, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. L. Nelson, “Estimating acceptance sampling plans for dependent production processes,” IIE Transactions vol. 25 pp. 11–18, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • V. S. Sampath Kumar and M. B. Rajarshi, “Continuous sampling plans for Markov-dependent production processes,” Naval Research Logistics vol. 34 pp. 629–644, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Sarkadi and I. Vincze, Mathematical Methods of Statistical Quality Control, Academic Press: New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. G. Schilling, Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control, Marcel Dekker: New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Stimson and C. M. Mastrangelo, “Monitoring serially-dependent processes with attribute data,” Journal of Quality Technology vol. 28 pp. 279–288, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Taylor, “A program for selecting efficient binomial double sampling plans,” Journal of Quality Technology vol. 18 pp. 67–73, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Vellaisamy, “On the number of successes in dependent trials,” Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods vol. 25 pp. 1745–1756, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Vellaisamy and A. P. Punnen, “On the nature of the binomial distribution,” Journal of Applied Probability vol. 38 pp. 31–44, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Vellaisamy and S. Sankar, “Sequential and systematic sampling plans for Markov dependent production process,” Naval Research Logistics vol. 48 pp. 451–467, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Vellaisamy and S. Sankar, “Modeling and designing Attribute sampling plans for a general dependent production process,” Technical Report, No. 82, Department of Mathematics, IIT Bombay, India, 2004.

  • P. Vellaisamy, S. Sankar, and M. Taniguchi, “Estimation and design of sampling plans for monitoring dependent production process,” Methodology and Computing Applied Probability vol. 5 pp. 85–108, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Vellaisamy.

Additional information

AMS 2000 Subject Classifications: Primary 62P30; Secondary 62E15, 65C60

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vellaisamy, P., Sankar, S. A Unified Approach for Modeling and Designing Attribute Sampling Plans for Monitoring Dependent Production Processes. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 7, 307–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-005-4519-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-005-4519-7

Keywords

Navigation