Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Measurement Techniques 6/2013

01.09.2013 | General Problems of Metrology and Measurement Technique

An approach for evaluating the results of key comparisons of standards with inconsistent data

verfasst von: A. G. Chunovkina, N. A. Burmistrova, N. D. Zvyagin

Erschienen in: Measurement Techniques | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Methods for evaluating data from key comparisons are examined and the existing methods for evaluating inconsistent data are briefly characterized. A practical approach is proposed for evaluating inconsistent data.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat BIPM 1999, Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates Issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA). BIPM 1999, Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates Issued by National Metrology Institutes (MRA).
2.
Zurück zum Zitat M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data,” Metrologia, 39, 589–595 (2002).ADSCrossRef M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data,” Metrologia, 39, 589–595 (2002).ADSCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM). ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007, International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat K. Weise and W. Woger, “Removing model and data nonconformity in measurement evaluation,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1649–1658 (2000).ADSCrossRef K. Weise and W. Woger, “Removing model and data nonconformity in measurement evaluation,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1649–1658 (2000).ADSCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Willink, “Statistical determination of a comparison reference value using hidden errors,” Metrologia, 39, 343–354 (2002).ADSCrossRef R. Willink, “Statistical determination of a comparison reference value using hidden errors,” Metrologia, 39, 343–354 (2002).ADSCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat L. Nielsen, “Identification and handling of discrepant measurements in key comparisons,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 5, 63–68 (2003); Measur. Techn., 46, No. 5, 513–522 (2003). L. Nielsen, “Identification and handling of discrepant measurements in key comparisons,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 5, 63–68 (2003); Measur. Techn., 46, No. 5, 513–522 (2003).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat D. R. White, “On the analysis of measurement comparisons,” Metrologia, 41, 122–131 (2004).ADSCrossRef D. R. White, “On the analysis of measurement comparisons,” Metrologia, 41, 122–131 (2004).ADSCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Kacker, “Combining information from interlaboratory evaluations using a random effects model,” ibid., 132–136. R. Kacker, “Combining information from interlaboratory evaluations using a random effects model,” ibid., 132–136.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat C. M. Sutton, “Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons,” ibid., 272–277. C. M. Sutton, “Analysis and linking of international measurement comparisons,” ibid., 272–277.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset,” Metrologia, 44, 187–200 (2007).ADSCrossRef M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset,” Metrologia, 44, 187–200 (2007).ADSCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat I. Lira, “Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons,” ibid., 415–421. I. Lira, “Combining inconsistent data from interlaboratory comparisons,” ibid., 415–421.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Elster and B. Toman, “Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging,” Metrologia, 47, 113–119 (2010).ADSCrossRef E. Elster and B. Toman, “Analysis of key comparisons: estimating laboratories’ biases by a fixed effects model using Bayesian model averaging,” Metrologia, 47, 113–119 (2010).ADSCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat B. Toman and A. Possolo, “Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons,” Accredit. Quality Assur., 14, 553–563 (2009).CrossRef B. Toman and A. Possolo, “Laboratory effects models for interlaboratory comparisons,” Accredit. Quality Assur., 14, 553–563 (2009).CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat O. Bodnar et al., “Application of Bayesian model averaging using a fixed effects model with linear drift for the analysis of key comparison CCM.P-K12,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 7–11 (2013); Measur. Techn., 56, No. 6, 584–590 (2013). O. Bodnar et al., “Application of Bayesian model averaging using a fixed effects model with linear drift for the analysis of key comparison CCM.P-K12,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 7–11 (2013); Measur. Techn., 56, No. 6, 584–590 (2013).
Metadaten
Titel
An approach for evaluating the results of key comparisons of standards with inconsistent data
verfasst von
A. G. Chunovkina
N. A. Burmistrova
N. D. Zvyagin
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Measurement Techniques / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0543-1972
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-8906
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-013-0248-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Measurement Techniques 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe