Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7/2017

27.04.2016 | Original Article

Dynamics and the economics of carbon sequestration: common oversights and their implications

verfasst von: Tas Thamo, David J. Pannell, Marit E. Kragt, Michael J. Robertson, Maksym Polyakov

Erschienen in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Accurate assessment of the cost of carbon sequestration is important for the development of mitigation policies globally. Given that sequestration in soils or vegetation is a lengthy process, such assessment requires financial discounting and making realistic assumptions about changes over time in the rate of sequestration, the price of carbon, and the opportunity cost incurred by adopting sequestration practices. Our objective is to demonstrate how these assumptions affect estimates of the cost of sequestration-based mitigation strategies. Using an Australian case study of soil carbon sequestration, our estimates of the carbon price required for financial viability are highly sensitive to dynamic assumptions, varying by a factor of four with different assumptions. Yet the influence of these time-related assumptions is poorly acknowledged in the literature, with many studies either failing to disclose their assumptions, or employing questionable assumptions and methods. Recommended global strategies are for researchers to report their assumptions related to dynamics much more transparently and to improve their research methods and the realism of their assumptions when analysing the economics of carbon sequestration. We recommend that policymakers become better aware of the issues created by dynamics, so that they are able to validly interpret assessments of the cost of sequestration and to ensure that they design policies in a way that facilitates fair comparison of the costs of mitigation strategies that operate over different timescales.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Mooney S et al (2001) Economic analysis of agricultural soil carbon sequestration: an integrated assessment approach. J Agr Resour Econ 26:344–367 Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Mooney S et al (2001) Economic analysis of agricultural soil carbon sequestration: an integrated assessment approach. J Agr Resour Econ 26:344–367
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Gollier C et al (2012) How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? Resour Futur Discus Pap 12:53 Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Gollier C et al (2012) How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? Resour Futur Discus Pap 12:53
Zurück zum Zitat Department of the Environment (2015a). Emissions Reduction Fund. www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund Cited 21 May 2015 Department of the Environment (2015a). Emissions Reduction Fund. www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund Cited 21 May 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Department of the Environment (2015b). Sequestering carbon in soils in grazing systems. Australian Government. http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction-fund/cfi/methodologies/determinations/sequestering-carbon-in-soils Cited 29 May 2015 Department of the Environment (2015b). Sequestering carbon in soils in grazing systems. Australian Government. http://​www.​environment.​gov.​au/​climate-change/​emissions-reduction-fund/​cfi/​methodologies/​determinations/​sequestering-carbon-in-soils Cited 29 May 2015
Zurück zum Zitat Flugge F, Abadi A (2006) Farming carbon: an economic analysis of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and dryland salinity reduction in Western Australia. Agroforest Syst 68:181–192. doi:10.1007/s10457-006-9008-7 CrossRef Flugge F, Abadi A (2006) Farming carbon: an economic analysis of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and dryland salinity reduction in Western Australia. Agroforest Syst 68:181–192. doi:10.​1007/​s10457-006-9008-7 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Grace PR, Antle J, Ogle S et al (2010) Soil carbon sequestration rates and associated economic costs for farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Soil Res 48:720–729CrossRef Grace PR, Antle J, Ogle S et al (2010) Soil carbon sequestration rates and associated economic costs for farming systems of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Soil Res 48:720–729CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ et al (2009) Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agr Ecosyst Environ 129:238–252. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.09.006 CrossRef Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ et al (2009) Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agr Ecosyst Environ 129:238–252. doi:10.​1016/​j.​agee.​2008.​09.​006 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hertzler GL (2006) Compounding and discounting under risk: net present values and real options values. In: Pannell DJ, Schilizzi SGM (eds) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK Hertzler GL (2006) Compounding and discounting under risk: net present values and real options values. In: Pannell DJ, Schilizzi SGM (eds) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Kingwell R (2009) The carbon challenge for mixed enterprise farms. Paper presented at the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society’s Annual Conference, Nelson, 27–28 August 2009 Kingwell R (2009) The carbon challenge for mixed enterprise farms. Paper presented at the New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society’s Annual Conference, Nelson, 27–28 August 2009
Zurück zum Zitat Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (1987) MIDAS, a bioeconomic model of a dryland farm system. Pudoc, Wageningen Kingwell RS, Pannell DJ (1987) MIDAS, a bioeconomic model of a dryland farm system. Pudoc, Wageningen
Zurück zum Zitat Lam SK, Chen D, Mosier AR et al (2013) The potential for carbon sequestration in Australian agricultural soils is technically and economically limited. Sci Rep 3:2179. doi:10.1038/srep02179 CrossRef Lam SK, Chen D, Mosier AR et al (2013) The potential for carbon sequestration in Australian agricultural soils is technically and economically limited. Sci Rep 3:2179. doi:10.​1038/​srep02179 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewandrowski J, Peters M, Jones C et al. (2004) Economics of sequestering carbon in the US agricultural sector. USDA Economic Research Service, Tech. Bulletin No. 1909 Lewandrowski J, Peters M, Jones C et al. (2004) Economics of sequestering carbon in the US agricultural sector. USDA Economic Research Service, Tech. Bulletin No. 1909
Zurück zum Zitat Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T et al (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. Springer, NetherlandsCrossRef Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T et al (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. Springer, NetherlandsCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G et al (2006) Using bioeconomic models to assess research priorities: a case study on afforestation as a carbon sequestration tool. Can J For Res 36:886–900. doi:10.1139/x05-297 CrossRef McKenney DW, Yemshanov D, Fox G et al (2006) Using bioeconomic models to assess research priorities: a case study on afforestation as a carbon sequestration tool. Can J For Res 36:886–900. doi:10.​1139/​x05-297 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Moulton RJ, Richards KR (1990) Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report WO-58 Moulton RJ, Richards KR (1990) Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Report WO-58
Zurück zum Zitat Ndjondo M, Gourlet-Fleury S, Manlay RJ et al (2014) Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa. Carbon Balance Manag 9:1–13CrossRef Ndjondo M, Gourlet-Fleury S, Manlay RJ et al (2014) Opportunity costs of carbon sequestration in a forest concession in central Africa. Carbon Balance Manag 9:1–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen ASE, Plantinga AJ, Alig RJ (2014) New cost estimates for carbon sequestration through afforestation in the United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-888. USDA Forest Service, Portland, ORCrossRef Nielsen ASE, Plantinga AJ, Alig RJ (2014) New cost estimates for carbon sequestration through afforestation in the United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-888. USDA Forest Service, Portland, ORCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pannell DJ, Schilizzi S (eds) (2006) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK Pannell DJ, Schilizzi S (eds) (2006) Economics and the future: time and discounting in private and public decision making. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen EH, Schilizzi S, Bennett D (2003) Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in south-western Australian farming systems. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47:211–231CrossRef Petersen EH, Schilizzi S, Bennett D (2003) Greenhouse gas and groundwater recharge abatement benefits of tree crops in south-western Australian farming systems. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 47:211–231CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Robison LJ, Barry PJ (1996) Present value models and investment analysis. Academic Page, Northport AL Robison LJ, Barry PJ (1996) Present value models and investment analysis. Academic Page, Northport AL
Zurück zum Zitat Rootzén JM, Berndes G, Ravindranath NH et al (2010) Carbon sequestration versus bioenergy: a case study from South India exploring the relative land-use efficiency of two options for climate change mitigation. Biomass Bioenerg 34:116–123. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.008 CrossRef Rootzén JM, Berndes G, Ravindranath NH et al (2010) Carbon sequestration versus bioenergy: a case study from South India exploring the relative land-use efficiency of two options for climate change mitigation. Biomass Bioenerg 34:116–123. doi:10.​1016/​j.​biombioe.​2009.​10.​008 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seidl R, Rammer W, Jäger D et al (2007) Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. For Ecol Manag 248:64–79CrossRef Seidl R, Rammer W, Jäger D et al (2007) Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. For Ecol Manag 248:64–79CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, UKCrossRef Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, UKCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Alavalapati JR (2008) Socioeconomic potential of carbon sequestration through agroforestry in the West African Sahel. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:745–761. doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9140-3 CrossRef Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Alavalapati JR (2008) Socioeconomic potential of carbon sequestration through agroforestry in the West African Sahel. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:745–761. doi:10.​1007/​s11027-007-9140-3 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Teklewold H (2012) The impact of shadow prices and farmers’ impatience on the allocation of a multipurpose renewable resource in Ethiopia. Environ Dev Econ 17:479–505CrossRef Teklewold H (2012) The impact of shadow prices and farmers’ impatience on the allocation of a multipurpose renewable resource in Ethiopia. Environ Dev Econ 17:479–505CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Torres AB, Marchant R, Lovett JC et al (2010) Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation. Ecol Econ 69:469–477. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.007 CrossRef Torres AB, Marchant R, Lovett JC et al (2010) Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation. Ecol Econ 69:469–477. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ecolecon.​2009.​09.​007 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Van’t Veld K, Plantinga A (2005) Carbon sequestration or abatement? The effect of rising carbon prices on the optimal portfolio of greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies. J Environ Econ Manag 50:59–81. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2004.09.002 CrossRef Van’t Veld K, Plantinga A (2005) Carbon sequestration or abatement? The effect of rising carbon prices on the optimal portfolio of greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies. J Environ Econ Manag 50:59–81. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jeem.​2004.​09.​002 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wilman EA (2011) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. J Agr Resour Econ 36:121 Wilman EA (2011) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. J Agr Resour Econ 36:121
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamics and the economics of carbon sequestration: common oversights and their implications
verfasst von
Tas Thamo
David J. Pannell
Marit E. Kragt
Michael J. Robertson
Maksym Polyakov
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9716-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe