Abstract
The present research investigated whether assessing adolescent elite athletes’ motivational profiles at the beginning of the season would allow us to predict their subsequent performance over the course of a competitive season. In two studies, athletes completed the French version of the Sport Motivation Scale (Brière et al., Int J Sport Psychol 26:465–489, 1995) at the beginning of the season. Objective levels of performance were recorded for the following season, as well as for the season prior to questionnaire completion. In Study 1, the sample comprised a total of 170 French junior national tennis players (M = 13.42 years). Results revealed the presence of a four-cluster solution, reflecting different levels of autonomous and controlled motivations. Results revealed that controlling for past performance, athletes with the least self-determined motivational profile obtained lower levels of subsequent tennis performance than those in the three other (more self-determined motivational) clusters. In Study 2, there were a total of 250 French junior national fencers aged 15 years. Results revealed a three-cluster solution very similar to that of Study 1. In addition, in line with Study 1, results revealed that the least self-determined motivational profile led to the lowest level of performance. Overall, these findings suggest that cluster analysis is useful in the understanding of the complex relationship between motivation and performance in elite sport.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It should be noted that because of the extremely high level of variance in the scores of the French Federation of Tennis, both the Performance 3 and Performance 4 scores were subjected to a log transformation.
All Fs, Ps, and η² can be obtained through the authors.
We also calculated the rank of each player relative to those within the present study (higher ranks = lower performance). Thus, based on the scores from the French Tennis Federation, each player was ranked from 1 to 170 for the first season, as well as for both the first and second seasons combined. Then the mean rank of each cluster was compared. Results for the first season revealed the following ranks: high AU–high C cluster = 77.4; mod AU–low C group = 70.3; high AU–mod C group = 70.2; mod AU–high C = 98.9. In line with the other results from this study, the least self-determined cluster (mod AU–high C cluster) was found to be ranked lower than the other three that did not differ among them, F(3, 166) = 2.47, P = .06, η² = .04. These results were replicated with performance for the two seasons combined with mean ranks of 75.7, 71.7, 75.7, and 104.3 for the four clusters in that order, F(3, 166) = 2.80, P < .05, η² = .05. What these results reveal is that national tennis players with the least self-determined motivational profile assessed before the beginning of the first season were ranked significantly lower (some 20 ranks lower after one season, and even 30 ranks lower after two seasons!) than other tennis players their own age who had a more self-determined motivational profile. Clearly motivation matters with respect to performance!
References
Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185–201. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S.
Biddle, S., & Brooke, R. (1992). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivational orientation in physical education and sport. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 247–256.
Boiché, J. C. S., Sarrazin, P. G., Grouzet, F. M. E., Pelletier, L. G., & Chanal, J. P. (2008). Students’ motivational profiles and achievement outcomes in physical education: A self-determination perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 688–701. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.688.
Brière, N. M., Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1995). Développement et validation d’une mesure de motivation intrinsèque, extrinsèque et d’amotivation en contexte sportif : L’Échelle de Motivation dans les Sports (EMS). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 465–489. On the development and validation of the French form of the Sport Motivation Scale.
Burton, K., Lydon, J., D’Alessandro, D., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750.
Chantal, Y., Guay, F., Dobreva-Martinova, T., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Motivation and elite performance: An exploratory investigation with Bulgarian athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 27, 173–182.
Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M. S., Biddle, S. J. H., Smith, B., & Wang, J. C. K. (2003). A meta-analysis of perceived locus of causality in exercise, sport, and physical education contexts. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 284–306.
Cresswell, S. L., & Eklund, R. C. (2005a). Motivation and burnout among top amateur rugby players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37, 469–477. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000155398.71387.C2.
Cresswell, S. L., & Eklund, R. C. (2005b). Motivation and burnout in professional rugby players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 370–376.
Cumming, J., & Hall, C. (2004). The influence of goal orientation on self-efficacy in exercise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 747–763. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02568.x.
Cumming, J., Hall, C., Harwood, C., & Gammage, K. (2002). Motivational orientations and imagery use: A goal profiling analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 127–136. doi:10.1080/026404102317200837.
Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 257–274. doi:10.1006/ceps.1995.1017.
Gore, P. A. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 298–321). San Diego: Academic Press.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1994). Role of parental motivational practices in children’s academic intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 104–113. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.104.
Gould, D., Dieffenbach, K., & Moffett, A. (2002). Psychological talent and their development in Olympic champions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 172–204. doi:10.1080/10413200290103482.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890–898. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890.
Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social context, students’ motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 211–233. doi:10.1007/BF02339891.
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2007). Editorial: Advances in self-determination theory research in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 597–599. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.06.003.
Hair, J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147–206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Harwood, C., Cumming, J., & Fletcher, D. (2004). Motivational profiles and psychological skills usage within elite youth sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 318–332. doi:10.1080/10413200490517986.
Hodge, K., & Petlichkoff, L. M. (2000). Goal “profiles” in sport: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 22, 256–272.
Hodge, K., Allen, J. B., & Smellie, L. (2008). Motivation in masters sport: Achievement and social goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 157–176. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.03.002.
Jobson, J. D. (1992). Applied multivariate data analysis, Vol. 2. Categorical and multivariate methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 355–368.
Lemyre, N. P., Treasure, D. C., & Roberts, G. C. (2006). Influence of variability in motivation and affect on elite athlete burnout susceptibility. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 32–48.
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
Li, F., & Harmer, P. (1996). Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Sport Motivation Scale: A structural equation modeling analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 396–405.
Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. A. (2008). The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 323–355.
Mallett, C. J., Kawabata, M., & Newcombe, P. (2007a). Progressing measurement in sport motivation: A response to Pelletier, Vallerand, and Sarrazin. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 622–631. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.001.
Mallett, C. J., Kawabata, M., Newcombe, P., Otero-Rorero, A., & Jackson, S. (2007b). Sport Motivation Scale-6: A revised six-factor sport motivation scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 600–614. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.005.
Martens, M. P., & Webber, S. N. (2002). Psychometric properties of the Sport Motivation Scale: An evaluation with college varsity athletes from the US. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 254–270.
Matsumoto, H., & Takenaka, K. (2004). Motivational profiles and stages of exercise behavior change. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2, 89–96.
McDonough, M. H., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2007). Testing self-determined motivation as a mediator of the relationship between psychological needs and affective and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 645–663.
McNeill, M. C., & Wang, C. K. J. (2005). Psychological profiles of elite school sports players in Singapore. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2003.10.004.
Ntoumanis, N. (2002). Motivational clusters in a sample of British physical education classes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 177–194. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00020-6.
Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A. M., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An idiographic analysis of amotivation in compulsory school physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 197–214.
Pelletier, L. G., & Sarrazin, P. (2007). Measurement issues in self-determination theory and sport. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 143–152). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–53.
Pelletier, L. G., Dion, S., Tuson, K., & Green-Demers, I. (1999). Why do people fail to adopt environmental behaviors? Towards a taxonomy of environmental amotivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2481–2504. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00122.x.
Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306. doi:10.1023/A:1014805132406.
Pelletier, L. G., Vallerand, R. J., & Sarrazin, P. (2007). The revised six factor Sport Motivation Scale (Mallett, Kawabata, Newcombe, Otero-Forero, & Jackson, 2007): Something old, something new, and something borrowed. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 615–621. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.03.006.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734–746. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734.
Reimer, H., Fink, J. S., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (2002). External validity of the Sport Motivation Scale. Avante, 8, 57–66.
Roberts, G. C. (1992). Motivation in sport and exercise: Conceptual constraints and convergence. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 3–29). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Roberts, G. C. (2001). Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Active human nature: Self-determination theory and the promotion and maintenance of sport, exercise, and health. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 1–19). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R. J., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L. G., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271–360). New York: Academic Press.
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (2nd ed., pp. 263–319). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Vallerand, R. J. (2007a). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for sport and physical activity. In M. S. Hagger & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport (pp. 255–279). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
Vallerand, R. J. (2007b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future. In G. Tenenbaum & R. E. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 49–83). New York: Wiley.
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599–620. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x.
Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142–169. doi:10.1080/10413209908402956.
Vallerand, R. J., & Rousseau, F. L. (2001). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise: A review using the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In R. Singer, H. Hausenblas, & C. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 389–416). New York: Wiley.
Vallerand, R. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Intrinsic motivation in sport. In K. B. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews (pp. 389–425). New York: MacMillan.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161.
Vlachopoulos, S. P., Karageorghis, C. I., & Terry, P. C. (2000). Motivation profiles in sport: A self-determination theory perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 387–397.
Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people’s motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 23, 1–22.
Wang, C. K. J., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Spray, C. M., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). Achievement goal profiles in school physical education: Differences in self-determination, sport ability beliefs, and physical activity. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 433–445. doi:10.1348/000709902320634401.
Williams, J. M., & Krane, V. (2001). Psychological characteristics of peak performance. In J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (4th ed., pp. 137–147). Mountain View: Mayfield.
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this manuscript was supported in parts by grants from the Fonds Québécois pour la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC) and the Social Sciences Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) to the second author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillet, N., Vallerand, R.J. & Rosnet, E. Motivational clusters and performance in a real-life setting. Motiv Emot 33, 49–62 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9115-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9115-z