Abstract
Implicit motive research has shown that implicit motives are important predictors of behavior and well-being. However, little is known about the interrelationship between the different implicit motives measures frequently applied. We aimed to shed light on the convergent validity of three implicit motive measures and wanted to test their assumed statistical independence from three explicit motive measures. Therefore, we administered the picture story exercise (PSE), the operant motive test (OMT), and the multi-motive grid in one and the same study. As explicit measures, we used the personality research form, the motive enactment test, and a goal questionnaire. We investigated the statistical overlaps between all these measures (sample: 202 undergraduate students) and found that the implicit motive measures showed either no or only little correlation with each other. Furthermore, they also partly correlated with explicit motive measures. Supplementary analyses showed that the lack of statistical overlap between PSE and OMT can partly be ascribed to their different scoring systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Besides the picture story exercise (PSE), the operant motive test (OMT), and the multi-motive-grid (MMG) described in detail below, a few other promising methods have been developed. For example, domain-specific measures exist such as the partner-related agency and communion test (PACT; Hagemeyer and Neyer 2012), which assesses implicit communal motives, the Achievement Motive Grid (Schmalt 1999), and the affiliation motive grid (Sokolowski 1992), which are precursors of the MMG. Furthermore, the implicit association test (IAT, Greenwald et al. 1998), based on response latency technique, has successfully been used to assess implicit motives (Brunstein and Schmitt 2004; Slabbinck et al. 2011). Another behavior-based test for assessing achievement motivation is the objective achievement motivation test (Schmidt-Atzert 2004). Here, participants have to navigate a winding road by pressing two keys on the keyboard. The test performance serves as measure of achievement motivation.
The study by Scheffer et al. (2007) was originally designed to test a more complex interaction effect.
We applied Winter’s (1994) scoring rule, according to which several motives can be scored for one story and one motive can be scored several times. When applying the OMT scoring rule, which says that the written material for each picture should only be scored for one motive, we got very similar results. The means for these achievement, affiliation and power motive were 1.78 (SD = 1.07), 2.12 (SD = .85), 1.76 (SD = 1.14). These scores correlated significantly with the scores reported in the text (achievement: r = .74, p < .001; affiliation: r = .51 p < .001; power: r = .81, p < .001) and additionally were significantly related to the corresponding PSE scores (achievement: r = .54, p < .001; affiliation: r = .42, p < .01; power: r = .13, ns).
The internal consistency scores for the PSE (Cronbach’s Alpha between .38 and .44) and for the OMT (Cronbach’s Alpha between .10 and .52) are low (see also Schultheiss et al. 2008). However, as Schultheiss et al. (2008) summarized, internal consistency coefficients are not a suitable criterion to evaluate implicit motive measures’ reliability (e.g., because the interplay between a stable motive and stable incentive cue in the pictures give rise to variable motive expression from one response to pictorial stimuli to the other; see also dynamics of action theory; Atkinson and Birch 1970). A more suitable criterion of reliability is the inter-rater reliability, which is sufficiently high for the PSE and OMT.
When correlating the hope components of each motive measure (OMT scores without categories 5, PSE without achievement category 4 and affiliation category 2, MMG hope scores; for OMT and PSE fear categories see Table 1) rather than using the aggregated score (hope plus fear), the correlation pattern is quite similar. The correlations between the OMT and PSE are an exception. The correlation between OMT-Ach and PSE-Ach changed from r = .12, ns (as reported in Table 2) to r = .18, p < .05. The correlation between OMT-Aff and PSE-Aff increased from r = .10, ns to r = .18, p < .05. However, the OMT-Pow and PSE-Pow correlation was no longer significant, r = .04, ns (rather than r = .15, p < .05).
The reader might wonder why we did not additionally code the OMT-generated text material using the PSE scoring system. We tried to do this, but failed due to the fact that the PSE scoring rules and categories are designed for “running texts” (title of Winter’s coding manual, Winter 1994) and do not seem to be applicable to texts in note form. We would be interested in other authors’ experiences with similar attempts.
See footnote 3.
The newly-generated achievement motive score correlated with the OMT achievement with r = .08, ns and with the MMG achievement score r = .03, ns. The correlations between the newly-generated affiliation (power) motive scores were r = −.05, ns (r = .23, ns) for the OMT and r = .25, p < .10 (r = .21, ns) for the MMG scores.
References
Andrews, J. O. W. (1967). The achievement motive and advancement in two types of organization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 163–168.
Atkinson, J. W., & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.
Atkinson, J. W., Heyns, R. W., & Veroff, J. (1954). The effect of experimental arousal of the affiliation motive on thematic apperception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 405–410.
Atkinson, J. W., & Walker, E. L. (1958). The affiliation motive and perceptual sensitivity to faces. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society: A method of assessment and study (pp. 360–366). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Aydinli, A., Bender, M., Chasiotis, A., Cemalcilar, Z., & van de Vijver, F. R. J. (2014). When does self-reported prosocial motivation predict helping? The moderating role of implicit prosocial motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 645–658. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9411-8.
Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Striving for unwanted goals: stress-dependent discrepancies between explicit and implicit achievement motives reduce subjective well-being and increase psychosomatic symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 781–799.
Baumann, N., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2010). Implicit motives: A look from personality systems interaction theory. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 375–403). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.781.
Baumann, N., & Scheffer, D. (2010). Seeing and mastering difficulty: The role of affective change in achievement flow. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1304–1328.
Biernat, M. (1989). Motives and values to achieve: Different constructs with different effects. Journal of Personality, 57, 69–95.
Birney, R. C., Burdick, H., & Teevan, R. C. (1969). Fear of failure. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold Company.
Brunstein, J. C. (2008). Implicit and explicit motives. In J. Heckhausen & H. Heckhausen (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 227–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brunstein, J. C., & Maier, G. W. (2005). Implicit and self-attributed motives to achieve: Two separate but interacting needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 205–222.
Brunstein, J. C., & Schmitt, C. H. (2004). Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the implicit association test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 536–555.
Brunstein, J. C., Schultheiss, O. C., & Grässmann, R. (1998). Personal goals and emotional well-being: The moderating role of motive dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 494–508.
Busch, H., Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., & Campos, D. (2013). The achievement flow motive as an element of the autotelic personality: Predicting educational attainment in three cultures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 239–254. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0112-y.
Chasiotis, A., & Hofer, J. (2003). Die Messung impliziter Motive in Deutschland, Costa Rica und Kamerun [Measurement of implicit motives in Germany, Costa Rica, and Cameroon]. Research report to the German Research Foundation (DFG).
De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
deCharms, R., Morrison, H., Reitman, W., & McClelland, D. C. (1955). Behavioral correlates of directly and indirectly measured achievement motivation. In D. C. McClelland (Ed.), Studies in motivation (pp. 414–423). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
Esters, F. (2006). Eifersucht bei bildlich dargestellter sexueller und emotionaler Untreue [Jealousy in response to pictures arousing sexual and emotional infidelity]. Unpublished thesis, University of Wuppertal.
Fodor, E. M., Wick, D. P., & Hartsen, K. M. (2006). The power motive and affective response to assertiveness. Journal of Researach in Personality, 40, 598–610.
Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 74, 175–222.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349–372.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
Hagemeyer, B., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: The Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT). Psychological Assessment, 24, 114–128.
Heckhausen, H. (1963a). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear components of achievement motivation]. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.
Heckhausen, H. (1963b). Hoffnung und Furcht in der Leistungsmotivation [Hope and fear in achievement motivation]. Meisenheim/Glan: Hain.
Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2008). Motivation and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heyns, R. W., Veroff, J., & Atkinson, J. W. (1958). A scoring manual for the affiliation motive. In J. W. Atkinson (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 205–218). Princeton, NY: Van Nostrand.
Hofer, J. (2010). Research on implicit motives across cultures. In O. C. Schultheiss & J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 433–466). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hofer, J., & Chasiotis, A. (2003). Congruence of life goals and implicit motives as predictors of life satisfaction: Cross-cultural implications of a study of Zambian male adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 251–272.
Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., & Campos, D. (2006). Congruence between social values and implicit motives: Effects on life satisfaction across three cultures. European Journal of Psychology, 20, 305–324.
Hurley, J. R. (1955). The Iowa Picture Interpretation Test: A multiple-choice variation of the TAT. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19(5), 372–376. doi:10.1037/h0040550.
Jackson, D. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
Jemmott, J. B. (1987). Social motives and susceptibility to disease: Stalking individual differences in health risks. Journal of Personality, 55, 267–298.
Job, V., Langens, T. A., & Brandstätter, V. (2009). Effects of achievement goal striving on well-being: The moderating role of the explicit achievement motive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 983–996.
Job, V., Oertig, D., Brandstätter, V., & Allemand, M. (2010). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit motivation and unhealthy eating behavior. Journal of Personality, 78, 1209–1238.
Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2011). Directional discrepancy between implicit and explicit power motives is related to well-being among managers. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 317–327. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9219-8.
Kehr, H. M. (2004). Implicit/explicit motive discrepancies and volitional depletion among managers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 315–327.
Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974–990. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.974.
Kuhl, J. (1999). Der Motiv-Umsetzungs-Test (MUT) [The motive-enactment-test (MUT)]. Unpublished questionnaire, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit. Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality. Interaction between psychological systems]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Kuhl, J., & Scheffer, D. (1999). Der operante multi-motive-test (OMT): Manual [The operant multi-motive-test (OMT): Manual]. Germany: University of Osnabrück.
Kuhl, J., Scheffer, D., & Eichstaedt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Ein neuer Ansatz zur Messung impliziter Motive [The operant motive test (OMT): A new approach to the assessment of implicit motives]. In F. Rheinberg & J. Stiensmeier-Pelster (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 129–149). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Langan-Fox, J., & Canty, J. M. (2010). Implicit and self-attributed affiliation motive congruence and depression: The moderating role of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 600–605.
Langens, T. A. (2003). Potential costs of goal imagery: The moderating role of fear of failure. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23, 27–44.
Langens, T. A., & Dorr, S. (2006). Fear of failure and sensitivity to emotional faces. Unpublished data, University of Wuppertal, Germany.
Langens, T. A., & Schmalt, H.-D. (2002). Emotional consequences of positive daydreaming: The moderating role of fear-of-failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 1725–1735.
Langens, T. A., & Schmalt, H.-D. (2009). Motivational traits: new directions and measuring motives with the Multi-Motive-Grid (MMG). In G. J. Boyle, G. Mattheus, & D. H. Sakofske (Eds.), Personality theory and assessment (pp. 523–544). London: Sage.
Langens, T. A., & Schüler, J. (2005). Written emotional expression and emotional well-being: The moderating role of fear-of-rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 818–830.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McAdams, D. P., & Constantian, C. A. (1983). Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 851–861.
McAdams, D. P., & Vaillant, G. E. (1982). Intimacy motivation and psychosocial adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 586–593.
McClelland, D.C. (1965). N achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(4), 389–392.
McClelland, D. C. (1979). Inhibited power motivation and high blood pressure in men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 182–190.
McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 10–31). Beverly Hills: Sage.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
McClelland, D. C. (1995). Achievement motivation in relation to achievement-related recall, performance, and urine flow, a marker associated with release of vasopressin. Motivation and Emotion, 19, 59–76.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McClelland, D. C., Davidson, R. J., & Saran, C. (1980). Stressed power motivation, sympathetic activation, immune function, and illness. Journal of Human Stress, 6(2), 11–19.
McClelland, D. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Motivational and other sources of work accomplishment in mid-life: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality, 60, 679–707.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96(4), 690–702.
McClelland, D. C., Patel, V., Stier, D., & Brown, D. (1987). The relationship of affiliative arousal to dopamine release. Motivation and Emotion, 9, 1–9.
Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperceptive Test. Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Wiley.
Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperceptive test manual. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Puca, R. M. (2005). The influence of the achievement motive on probability estimates in pre- and post-decisional action phases. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 245–262.
Puca, R. M., Rinkenauer, G., & Breidenstein, C. (2006). Individual differences in approach and avoidance movements: How the avoidance motive influences response force. Journal of Personality, 74(4), 979–1014.
Puca, R. M., & Schmalt, H. D. (1999). Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 15–29.
Quirin, M., Düsing, R., & Kuhl, J. (2013a). Implicit affiliation motive predicts correct intuitive processing. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(1), 24–31.
Quirin, M., Gruber, T., Kuhl, J., & Düsing, R. (2013b). Is love right? Prefrontal resting brain asymmetry is related to the affiliation motive. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 902. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00902.
Scheffer, D. (2005). Implizite Motive [Implicit motives]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Scheffer, D., Eichstaedt, J., Chasiotis, A., & Kuhl, J. (2007). Towards an integrated measure of need affiliation and agreeableness derived from the operant motive test. Psychology Science, 49, 308–324.
Scheffer, D., Kuhl, J., & Eichstaedt, J. (2003). Der Operante Motiv-Test (OMT): Inhaltsklassen, Auswertung, psychometrische Kennwerte und Validierung [The operant motive test (OMT): Contents, scoring, psychometric values, and validation]. In J. Stiensmeier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 151–167). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schmalt, H. D. (1999). Assessing the achievement motive using the Grid Technique. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 109–130.
Schmalt, H.-D. (2006). Waist-to-hip ration and female physical attractiveness: The moderating role of power motivation and the mating context. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 455–465.
Schmalt, H. D., & Langens, T.A. (1996). Projective, semi-projective, and self-report measures of human motivation predict private cognitive events: striving, memories, and daydreaming. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wuppertal.
Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2004). OLMT. Objektiver Leistungsmotivationstest [Objective Achievement Motivation Test]. Moedling: Schuhfried.
Schnelle, J., Brandstätter, V., & Knöpfel, A. (2010). The adoption of approach versus avoidance goals. The role of goal-relevant resources. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 215–229.
Schüler, J. (2007). Arousal of flow-experience in a learning setting and its effects on exam-performance and affect. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21, 217–227.
Schüler, J. (2010). Achievement incentives determine the effects of achievement-motive incongruence on flow experience. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 2–14.
Schüler, J., Job, V., Fröhlich, S., & Brandstätter, V. (2008). A high implicit affiliation motive does not always make you happy. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 231–242.
Schüler, J., Sheldon, K. M., & Fröhlich, S. M. (2010). Implicit need for achievement moderates the relationship between felt competence and subsequent motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 1–12.
Schultheiss, O. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 603–633). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C. (2013). Are implicit motives revealed in mere words? Testing the marker-word hypothesis with computer-based text analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 748. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00748.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2001). Assessment of implicit motives with a research version of the TAT: Picture profiles, gender differences and relations to other personality measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 71–86.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2002). Inhibited power motivation and persuasive communication: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality, 70, 553–582.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Brunstein, J. C. (2010). Implicit motives. NY: Oxford University Press.
Schultheiss, O. C., Dargel, A., & Rohde, W. (2003). Implicit motives and gonadal steroid hormones: Effects of menstrual cycle phase, oral contraceptive use, and relationship status. Hormones and Behavior, 43, 293–301.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to perceived facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31(1), 13–24.
Schultheiss, O. C., Liening, S. H., & Schad, D. (2008). The reliability of a picture story exercise measure of implicit motives: Estimates of internal consistency, retest reliability, and ipsative stability. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1560–1571.
Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford.
Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., & Stanton, S. J. (2004). Effects of affiliation and power motivation arousal on salivary progesterone and testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 46(5), 592–599.
Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Torges, C. M., Pang, J. S., Villacorta, M. A., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Effects of implicit power motivation on men’s and women’s implicit learning and testosterone changes after social victory or defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 174–188.
Schultheiss, O. C., Yankova, D., Dirlikov, B., & Schad, D. J. (2009). Are implicit and explicit motive measures statistically independent? A fair and balanced test using the picture story exercise and a cue-and response-matched questionnaire measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 72–81.
Shipley, T. E., & Veroff, J. (1952). A projective measure of need for affiliation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 349–356.
Slabbinck, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Kenhove, P. (2011). A pictorial attitude IAT as a measure of implicit motives. European Journal of Personality, 25, 76–86.
Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sokolowski, K. (1992). Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Messung des Anschlußmotivs [The development of a measure for the motive to affiliate]. Diagnostica, 38, 1–17.
Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.-D., Langens, T. A., & Puca, R. M. (2000). Assessing achievement, affiliation, and power motives all at once—The multi-motive grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 126–145.
Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.
Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N., & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche Personality Research Form (PRF) [German Personality Research Form (PRF)]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Thrash, T. M., Elliot, A. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2007). Methodological and dispositional predictors of congruence between implicit and explicit need for achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 961–974.
Uleman, J. S. (1972). The need for influence: Development and validation of a measure, in comparison with need for power. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 85, 157–214.
Veroff, J. (1957). Development and validation of a projective measure of power motivation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 1–8.
Wegner, M., Bohnacker, V., Mempel, G., Teubel, T., & Schüler, J. (2014a). Explicit and implicit affiliation motives predict verbal and nonverbal social behavior in sports competition. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 588–595. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.06.001.
Wegner, M., & Schüler, J. (2014). The implicit achievement motive and general life stress affect time spent on competitive matches in racquet sports. In C. Mohiyeddin (Ed.), Contemporary topics and trends in the psychology of sports (pp. 153–176). New York: Nova Publishers.
Wegner, M., Schüler, J., & Budde, H. (2014b). The implicit affiliation motive moderates cortisol responses to acute psychosocial stress in high school students. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 48, 162–168. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.06.013.
Wegner, M., & Teubel, T. (2014). The implicit achievement motive predicts match performances and the explicit motive predicts choices for target distances in team sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45, 1–18.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: The Free Press.
Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text. Unpublished instrument, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Winter, D. G. (1999). Linking personality and “scientific” psychology: The development of empirically derived thematic apperception test measures. In L. Gieser & M. I. Stein (Eds.), Evocative images: The thematic apperception test and the art of projection (pp. 107–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Woike, B., Mcleod, S., & Goggin, M. (2003). Implicit and explicit motives influence accessibility to different autobiographical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 29(8), 1046–1055. doi:10.1177/0146167203254504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V., Wegner, M. et al. Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of three implicit motive measures: PSE, OMT, and MMG. Motiv Emot 39, 839–857 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9502-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9502-1