Skip to main content
Log in

Highlighting the difference between approach and avoidance motivation enhances the predictive validity of performance-avoidance goal reports

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigated whether highlighting the difference between norm-based approach and avoidance motivation impacts performance goal reporting accuracy. Participants were randomly assigned to receive no instructions, or reading materials indicating that norm-based approach and avoidance motivation are the same (Same condition) or different (Different condition). In Study 1 (N = 978), experimental condition was tested as a moderator of the relation between antecedent variables and performance goal reports. In Study 2 (N = 957), experimental condition was tested as a moderator of the predictive utility of performance goal reports. Both studies showed that while relations with performance-approach goals remained unaffected, experimental condition moderated the relation between performance-avoidance goal reports and their antecedent variables (Study 1), and their process and outcome variables (Study 2). The strongest associations (the most accurate goal reports) came from the different condition. Highlighting the difference between approach and avoidance enhanced the predictive validity of performance-avoidance goal reports. Implications for understanding and measuring achievement goals are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some conceptualizations of performance goals also include a demonstration or appearance component, whereby performance-approach goals include trying to demonstrate that one is competent and performance-avoidance goals include trying to demonstrate that one is not incompetent (Elliot 2005; Urdan and Mestas 2006).

  2. We also tested whether there were conditions effects of the experimental materials on all measured motivation outcomes (i.e. pride, anxiety, etc.). No significant differences between conditions emerged for any of the processes and outcomes associated with performance-approach goals: for pride F(2, 954) = 1.07, p = .34, engagement F(2, 954) = 1.86, p = .16, nor help seeking F(2, 954) = 0.20, p = .82. Nor did any significant differences between conditions emerge for any of the processes and outcomes associated with performance-avoidance goals: anxiety F(2, 954) = 0.26, p = .77, help avoidance F(2, 954) = 0.25, p = .78, nor interest F(2, 954) = 0.40, p = .67.

References

  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellar, D. F., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Young, S. K., Fisher, D. M., Adair, C. K., Haynes, S., et al. (2011). Trait goal orientation, self-regulation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity for psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., Da Fonseca, D., & Moller, A. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. Handbook of Competence and Motivation, 16, 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 139–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 865–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). Stability and change in achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hangen, E. J., Elliot, A. J., & Jamieson, J. P. (2018). Lay conceptions of norm-based approach and avoidance motivation: Implications for the performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal relation. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 359–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality research form manual. New York: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. P., Hangen, E. J., Lee, H. Y., & Yeager, D. S. (2017). Capitalizing on appraisal processes to improve affective responses to social stress. Emotion Review, 10, 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick, S. A., Wooley, M. E., Friedel, J. M., Ammon, B. V., Blazevski, J., & Kelly, K. L. (2007). Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: Do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist, 42, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korn, R. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). The 2 × 2 standpoints model of achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, W., Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2012). Perceived competence moderates the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 806–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, A. D., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 486–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Middleton, M. J., Ciani, K. D., Easter, M. A., O’Keefe, P. A., & Zusho, A. (2012). The strength of the relation between performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations: Theoretical, methodological, and instructional implications. Educational Psychologist, 47, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 21(1), 19–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochbaum, M., & Gottardy, J. (2015). A meta-analytic review of the approach-avoidance achievement goals and performance relationships in the sport psychology literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4, 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochbaum, M., Jean-Noel, J., Pinar, C., & Gilson, T. (2017). A meta-analytic review of Elliot’s (1999) Hierarchical Model of Avoidance and approach Motivation in the sport, physical activity, and physical education literature. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 6, 68–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48(1), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y. P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353–387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 320–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, A., Murakami, Y., & Okuno, T. (2002). Achievement goals, attitudes toward help seeking, and help-seeking behavior in the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, N. W., Blaga, M., & Postmes, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of self-reported achievement goals and nonself-report performance across three achievement domains (work, sports, and education). PLoS ONE, 9, e93594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Cortina, K. S. (2005). Motives, goals, and adaptive patterns of performance in Asian American and Anglo American students. Learning and Individual differences, 15(2), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Allison Ryan for providing the adaptive help seeking and help avoidance measures used in study 2.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship (NSF GRFP DGE 1419118) awarded to EJH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily J. Hangen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hangen, E.J., Elliot, A.J. & Jamieson, J.P. Highlighting the difference between approach and avoidance motivation enhances the predictive validity of performance-avoidance goal reports. Motiv Emot 43, 387–399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9744-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9744-9

Keywords

Navigation